
Fresco from the Serbian Mileseva Monastery, St. Sava, first Serbian Archbishop and the Father of Serbian nation.
Freedom-Loving Serbs Do Not Seek Admission to Autocratic Clubs
Recently, Mary asked for assistance on one of the lists I’m a member of. Her grandson’s high school teacher has asked the students to write an essay in response to the question “What has Serbia contributed to the world that would give reason for them to be permitted to become a member of the European Union?”
After a number of interesting letters and suggestions listing great Serbs and Serbian sacrifices through the history, John Bosnitch responded with the following letter. It is, to date, the most thorough and the most educated snapshot of the world history and the role of Serbia in it that I have had the pleasure to read, so I’m passing it on:
Dear Mary (Last Name),
Might I ask you to please pass this letter on to your grandson with my best regards? You said he was a good student, so I hope he likes reading -- this is long, but the correct way to respond to (not answer) the question he has been posed requires extensive historical background.
I have been reading with interest all the responses that have flowed in to help your grandson tell his teacher why Serbia should be permitted to join the European Union. It has been a pleasure to read the many interesting stories and historical facts submitted by our list members. But I have yet to read the response that I expected most of all:
Serbia and the Serbian people have no reason, now or ever, to justify themselves or their conduct to anyone other than God. Not only that, but furthermore, it is the essence of the freedom-loving Serb not to seek admission to any club in which he would be anything less than the most sought-after invited guest.
This is the answer that the teacher needs to hear because it is the answer most consistent with our character, our history and our destiny.
Anti-Serbianism Goes Far Back in History
The fact that our nation is being dragged through the mud by the media today is nothing new. We were a primary target of Hitler’s propaganda machine ahead of and during World War II, and before that of the racist Austro-Hungarian press and that of German Kaiser Wilhelm as they prepared their public to applaud the butchery that their forces practiced against civilian Serb men, women and children in World War I. They killed us in the millions.
As for America’s belated involvement in both of those wars, they joined those wars as our allies, supporting our struggle and not the other way around. The “Allies” was our club -- they were the “Johnny-come-lately.” When the Allies paraded in Paris, we marched in the place of honor. Internal Central Power documents show that World War I was decided when Serbian forces broke through the Salonika front and threatened to drive straight to Vienna. German General Ludendorf passed the Kaiser the news that all was lost and Germany surrendered. So, although the allies helped divert the Germans, we beat them. In World War II, the delay that Hitler needed to defeat Yugoslavia before attacking Russia is considered the main reason for his defeat -- he was subsequently beaten in Russia by “General Winter” in a campaign that was supposed to have finished before it became so cold that his tanks’ tracks would freeze solid.
Leaving the World Wars aside, the anti-Serbianism goes much further back. Bismark considered Serbia to be the main threat to Germany as well. It was he who orchestrated the German policy of interference in the Balkans. It was Germans who supported and continue to support the most extreme Albanians against the Serbs, just as they support the Turks against the Russians. We are known as the stone that can’t be swallowed in the Balkans and indeed, in Europe as a whole. When Hitler conquered Europe, the resistance started in Yugoslavia, among Serb monarchist guerrillas. (The Partizans joined the resistance only later, when Stalin reversed his orders for them to assist the German invaders of Yugoslavia -- after Hitler surprised him by invading Russia).
Proud and Free Nation
So you might be wondering, what did we do to deserve all this hatred?
It certainly originates in response to our national character. We once had a great empire and thanks to our Church and national epic poems/songs we have remembered that fact. A nation is like a baby -- once it has stood on its feet, it seldom wants to get back on its knees. And our empire was one known for its principles and for the rights it gave its people. We were lucky to be guided by our national patron and religious leader, Saint Sava, who instilled the principles of Christianity in the bosom of the state. This kind of a background is hard to wipe away. We certainly started out no more noble than any other nation, but our leaders in those old days led us to the high road and the Church maintained our identity through an amazing effort of national survival during 500 years of occupation under the Ottoman Turks.
Suffering makes good, strong people. The trait of perseverance, once learned through hardship is hard to lose. The Turks hardened us, they made us more stubborn than we were and more determined than almost any other nation in Europe. So, when we emerged by force of our own arms from enslavement after Black George’s [Karadjordje] uprising in 1804, we rose as a nation, proud and free. Families like mine, who were well-to-do, automatically donated as much as they could to the uprising. My family donated carriage-loads full of sugar to Karadjordje’s troops and asked for not a cent back after the uprising succeeded. The nation came first. Money wasn’t even a close second -- for any of us.
Unforgivable: Following a Pig Farmer Instead of a German Prince
So Serbs re-emerged on the European scene, but surprisingly there was little welcome for us. Think about it. There were a mere handful of countries in Europe, most of them grand empires. At the start of the 1800s there were Great Britain, Spain, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Russia in Europe with few small states at all. Then, suddenly, Serbia arrives and insists on recognized, equal statehood. And it does so under a leader who was not a so-called “blue-blood” (Black George Petrovic, called “black” because of his uncontrollable temper, was a pig farmer before taking up the sword for his nation). The old noble families from the Nemanjic imperial era, mine included, without any second thought ceded any hereditary claims and instead supported the creation of a new modern popular monarchy, leaving Serbia’s extinguished medieval empire to history. And so a pig farmer became our leader. It was unheard of in the whole of Europe. And more important still, when we finally did get international recognition, we refused to accept a German-blooded prince as the head of our statelet.
Being in high school, especially in America, you might be wondering what I am talking about when I speak of German-blooded princes. Here’s the story they don’t teach in most schools:
After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, Western Europe descended into a period of barbarism seldom even imagined. Law meant nothing and bandits harassed travelers and raided towns and villages across the lands. Vikings attacked the shores, raping, raiding and murdering. The papacy was traded among families like a trinket. In response to all this, warlords eventually sprang up in centers of population, building castles into which villagers could flee when the masses of bandits raided their lands. These warlords slowly extended some minimal protections to areas around their castles in return for lifelong servitude of the people who lived as serfs on the land -- unable to travel or leave their feudal master’s domain on pain of death.
Amid all this servitude, the [Roman] Catholic church attempted to reassert some kind of order, although it continued to conduct its religious masses only in Latin so that no normal man had any idea what was being said (serfs were illiterate, there was no schooling, and Latin -- well that was something only the feudal lord and his family might have learned from an imported tutor). Even reading the Bible was impossible, for it too was only available in Latin. So there was a mass of uneducated people, enslaved as serfs, led by brutal warlords who maintained such nice customs as the “right of the first night” in which every groom could be ordered to send his beautiful new wife up to the “lord’s” bedroom before he, as her husband, could spend his first night with her. Even if such institutionalized and generally brutal rape sounds a “bit” un-Christian, there was nothing to worry about -- the “lord” could summon the [Roman] Catholic priest to the castle the very next morning, pay him some money and give him some wine, and have the priest absolve him of his sins... routinely. The Protestants hadn’t surfaced yet.
German Warlord Inherits Roman Empire
This horrid society all took some form of permanent order after several hundred years of brutal animalism. Then the Pope in Rome realized that he could make a deal with one of the rising great warlords named Karol. Karol was a warlord of the largest nation in Europe, the Germanic tribes. Karol had gone far beyond conquering and subjecting only the lands around his castle. He was such a powerful warrior that he conquered neighboring warlords as well. Eventually he had what looked like a real kingdom. But he wanted his creation to last. What is taken by the sword can be lost by the sword just as quickly. He needed legitimacy. He wanted to create something like the Roman Empire, which still existed far to the East in Constantinople, but was only a distant dim memory in Western Europe.
Remember, at the end of its existence, the Western Roman empire was not the empire of Julius Caesar or Nero. It had learned of the usefulness of wrapping itself in the cloak of divine legitimacy -- it had adopted Christianity to become simultaneously a military empire and a religious system. When the empire fell, the church tried to retain its power. The Pope wore an imperial crown just like an emperor (something they no longer do for public relations reasons, although they still keep the crown) and ran a control system modeled on dioceses that mimicked the former Roman imperial administration. They also ran the world’s most advanced spying network -- everyone who wished to avoid eternal damnation had to report once a week to the church to make a confession of all their sins to the priest. The priest usually worked hand-in-hand with the feudal master, so the two of them knew of every crime, every lie, every case of incest or rape, right from the perpetrator’s own mouth... and effectively had a complete grip on the community through blackmail. That system is something the CIA or former KGB could only envy.
Well, the bloodied warlord and the spying Pope made a deal. Warlord Karol would travel down to Rome with his barbarian lieutenants (they all stayed for just a few days) and the Pope would crown him, not as a king, but as the emperor! Yes, the emperor of Rome, simultaneously extending Karol’s kingdom across Europe and extending the [Roman] Catholic church to the north out of its physical enclave around Rome. And so a deal “made in heaven” was reached. And from then on, [Roman] Catholic priests rode out into battle beside German Christianized barbarians bringing death and destruction to any who would not convert to the new world order. How do you think that the Polish Slavs ended up being 99% Catholic and not Orthodox like the rest of the Slavs? Simple, the Teutonic (Germanic) Knights drove east into the Slav lands carrying a cross in one hand and a sword in the other. These German “Christians” killed with no hesitation anyone who did not convert -- after all, killing an infidel was not a sin. So the Poles became Catholics, and from this “noble” origin they eventually got Pope John Paul II.
German Barbarian Turned Roman Emperor Conquers Europe
In any event, from the glorious start of Karol, the German barbarian turned “Holy Roman Emperor,” there was a new order in Europe. As the emperor, he become the blood source of almost all European monarchies. The system was both genetically based (to gain legitimacy, all monarchs were expected have some kind of blood link to the emperor or to marry a woman related to him) and religiously based (the crown of each king had to be blessed by the Pope). Even we Serbs came close to joining this system at one stage -- the first crown ever delivered to a Serbian king in the Nemanjic era came from the Pope in Rome, before our nation turned its eyes irrevocably east to Orthodoxy and sent back the poisoned crown.
In the modern era, by the time Serbia regained its freedom from the Ottomans, the European monarchies were all German. Of course the Germans ruled the many German principalities, the German Hapsburgs ruled Austria, the German Hanovers ruled England (they changed their name to Windsor in WWI for better public relations), the French Bourbons were the descendants of Karol, who was called Carolus Magnus by the Pope (in Latin) and thus Charlemagne or Charles the Great in French and English, the Spanish Bourbons were and still are of the same family, the Italians would be ruled by Lombardi Germans, and then Piedmont-based Germans, the Greeks would soon get a German king, as did the Bulgarians and Romanians and so on. Even the Romanovs of Russia were so intermarried with German princesses that starting from the founder of the dynasty, Mikhail, every single reigning descendant (except Aleksander III) married a German princess... including the final Tsar Nikolas II, whose wife Alexandra of Hesse was denounced as the “German” by rebelling Russians, just as the French people turned on the wife of Louis XVI likewise decrying the “German” (she was an Austrian Hapsburg) for exactly the same reason: People don’t like being ruled by foreigners.

Black George - Karadjordje, Serbian pig farmer who led the rebellion against the Ottomans freeing Serbia from the Turkish yoke.
Serbia Endures Without a Degenerate German Princeling at its Helm
You might have heard of Serbia being described in recent years as a “pariah state” (an outcast, coming from the term for the “dirty” untouchable caste in south India). If you have, take no heed. We have been a pariah nation since long before the demonization that we have suffered in the past two decades. We were considered pariah from the very moment at which we chose a native king to rule our land instead of inviting some degenerate unemployed German princeling to become our titular head. It might not seem like much of an issue today, but it was about as unimaginable an idea in Europe to have a native, non-German king as it would have been to have a Black president in the USA in the 1950s.
Yet we endured. We had our native Church, our native monarchy, our native language (Croats were speaking Hungarian under Austro-Hungarian rule for centuries; Slovenes spoke German, Bosnians were still occupied by Turkey...), and our own unique phonetic alphabet. All of this helped make us the strongest nation at the center of the Balkans, blocking German expansion to the southeast and to their anti-Russian ally Turkey. The mix of hatred and secret envy of Serbian freedoms (remember we were never serfs, but the Croats and all other Europeans were) generated anti-Serb cartoons in European papers over the past two centuries that make the lies they have been telling about these days seem tame by comparison. Only the Jews and maybe the Gypsies (Roma) ever suffered anything like the discrimination we have faced.
For example, now you can see the roots of Yugoslvia’s involvement in the non-aligned movement even during Tito’s era. We have a tendency toward independence and freedom that comes to us naturally.
European Union Grown Out of the Rivalry of German Tribes
Which brings me to my advice as to what you should write in your report to your teacher....
[...] The question was:
What has Serbia contributed to the world that would give reason for them to be permitted to become a member of the European Union?
So let’s dissect this nonsense question. Since when was a “contribution to the world” a condition for EU membership? (Was Germany’s world contribution the Holocaust? And was Spain’s the Inquisition -- or was it its wanton rape and pillage of the New World?) Since when should we Serbs, at the heart of Europe, need permission from anyone to be European? (Remember all that opportunistic Western propaganda about Sarajevo being the very heart of Europe -- well, let’s flip it back at them.) And then let’s ask what authority the EU had in international law to appropriate for its currency the name “euro” without automatically allowing all Europeans right up the Ural mountains the right to call it their own. They certainly have no trade mark on the word Europe -- it belongs to all of us. So, the EU is obviously not synonymous with Europe. Which means that we need to define what, in fact, it is...
If you search a little bit, it won’t take you long to find that the EU grew out of an economic alliance between the ruling capitalists of Germany and France to end their hundreds of years of civil war. Why do I use the term “civil war” to describe World War I and World War II and the many France-Germany wars before that? Because all of them were based on the rivalry between two groups of Germans; those who stayed in Germany and the Franks (a German tribe) who left Germany to drive West and subjugate the Gauls (who lived in the old Roman province of Gaul that has since been renamed “France” in honor of its German conquerors). The Germans on both sides of Alsace-Lorraine then fought over that territory for centuries after King Lothair, one of three German descendants of Karol, died without a successor and his cousins to the east in Germany and to the west in France could not agree on who should get his kingdom... (Lothair’s kingdom = Lothair’s regnum (Latin) = Lorraine).
German Saddle Doesn’t Fit on Serbian Back
Many millions of deaths later, these two groups of Germanic peoples decided to stop massacring each other and build a common market based on cooperation first in steel development and production, later in other areas and finally in the form of the EU. The French ruling elites revealed their true roots by submitting largely to German leadership and we now have a new Europe ruled primarily by Germans who have enticed other nations to join through economic incentives -- bribery if you like. For many, the financial offer is more important than anything else -- after all, these are nations that have all been ruled by foreign, German kings for most of their history, so the saddle still fits nicely on their backs.
But Serbia is different. We have never submitted to the German-dominated systems -- neither Hitler’s, nor the Kaiser’s, nor Bismark’s, nor the Austrian German variants before that. We have grown to love freedom more than money, or at least that has been our character until now.
Joining the German-Led Europe Involves Surrender of Sovereignty
And so we face a historic challenge. Shall we finally join the German-led Europe after all these battles for our freedom?
If it were merely a free-trade deal like NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement) the loss of sovereignty would be limited and Serbia would remain an independent state. But that is not what the EU represents. Instead the EU represents an effort of the ruling classes of each member state to form a common union in which the economic reward is merely a bribe in search of the surrender of sovereignty -- which is their trophy. With national independence snuffed out, the EU ruling elites will eventually operate the place as a single country, ruled mainly from Berlin and the European central bank in Frankfurt. It will have its own army and all the member states will have to send troops to participate in its “adventures.” In Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Sudan, and maybe even in Russia, young Serb men would be in arms, extending Western-style “freedom,” the essence of [Roman] Catholicism and “human rights” to our brother Slavs at the end of a rifle barrel.
The costs sound bad, so what about the benefits? Well, being at the far end of the new German empire, instead of seeing things flow our way, we would certainly see all of our best and brightest youth heading to the center of European power in flows so great that they would dwarf the past flows of Yugoslav gastarbeiters (guest workers) into Germany, the brain drain that we have seen during or since these latest Balkan wars, and certainly the period of forced indoctrination of Serb youths in Ottoman Turkey as kidnapped janissaries.
Most of the main economic activity in the EU is based in the center of the EU -- in Germany and France. They make the AirBus planes and Mercedes cars -- we might be “permitted” to make some tires for each of them. Our free-for-all agricultural industry will be totally mechanized and the early-morning markets in the piazzas (public squares) will be replaced by sterile supermarkets full of frozen foods -- have you ever tasted a tomato anywhere in the EU (or even America) that tastes as good as a fresh tomato from an open market in Serbia? No, I did not think so.
As a sign of things to come, as soon as the pro-EU opposition seized power in their October 2000 coup in Serbia there were hundreds of truckloads (hundreds of thousands of tons) of genetically modified soy beans (unwanted anywhere else) being dumped into northern Vojvodina as the first doors opened to “superior” Western and EU goods. Since then, German investors have bought up most of the privatized Serbian industries, and even the media. Today, Germans own the main newspapers that Serbs read in Belgrade. Entry to the EU will make the surrender of Serbia’s independence and the collapse of national self-sufficiency even more complete.
And all trade, not just agriculture, will be regulated by the most massive and inhuman bureaucracy ever seen... a bureaucracy based not in Serbia but in faraway Brussels. For more reasons to stay out of the EU, check the web site of the United Kingdom Independence Party (it is very interesting to hear people talking this way from INSIDE the European Union).
Serbia Should Stay Out of the EU
So in fact, your teacher’s question should not have been the misleading one that you received. Countries entering the EU are not judged on their world contributions, but instead on their level of servitude and willingness to be ruled from abroad in return for some small change. One day, the EU might become a better thing, after this model collapses, and it might be replaced by a real free-trade zone without the loss of national freedoms. That might be something to consider. But for now, Serbia’s best bet is to stay out, raise financing independently (perhaps from the booming economies over here in Asia, where I have lived for years) and build a vibrant economy that serves the interests of the Serbian people before all else. With that goal achieved, we could wait for the inevitable gold-embossed invitation from the EU or its likely successor organization and negotiate whatever we like from a position of strength rather than from our knees as beggars.

Awarded poster by Petar Koren, Serbian Kosovo - Gracanica
Don’t let the wrong question confuse you... no matter how many Teslas or Pupins or raspberries, soccer championships, or guerrillas wars of resistance, or anything else we can claim, the only thing that counts is our willingness to submit, be ruled and smile at the thought of it. Serbia is the richest country in the Balkans. It sits on the crossroads of land and water transport to the east and the south. We can name our price for anything we are asked to do for Europe. But if Serbia is thrown open to the EU now, before we can compete properly, it would only be because our current rulers hope to skim a nice percentage for themselves, personally.
Let’s stay in step with people like the British UKIP (Independence Party), Switzerland, and Iceland... people who know the difference between a con and a good deal.
Correct Your Teacher’s (Misleading) Question
Back to the classroom scenario... Might I suggest that you rewrite the question and answer your own new question? Simply tell the teacher that the premise of his question was false -- world contributions are not criteria for EU admission. Then, to prove that point, refer him to this page, which lists the Copenhagen Criteria which are the REAL conditions for EU membership.
It might be of some interest that even I, a staunch anti-communist, doubt that the EU membership condition of having a “market economy” can be reconciled with the EU’s stated commitment to “democracy.” The European Union cannot really be democratic when its own charter outlaws Communist “planned economies” even if the people of an EU state freely elect a Communist government. So there is certainly more here than meets the eye... and less freedom in the EU than you might imagine.
I suggest that you might write a much more interesting and informative paper, entitled “The pros and cons for Serbia seeking EU membership, now or in the future.”
I was also a top student in high school and my best teachers appreciated it when I “corrected” their questions. But even if we aren’t dealing with your “best” teacher, I would still correct his question...
Why? Because it would be the Serbian thing to do!
Sincerely,
John Bosnitch
Tokyo