
Prime Minister Kostunica with UN Security Council Ambassadors in Belgrade.
Speaking of the Devil...
Around the same time when 15 Ambassadors of the UN Security Council were informed by the members of Serbian government about the real situation in southern Serbian province, which happens to be very different from the one presented by the rosy reports Ruecker’s office keeps submitting to the UN from his Pristina parlor, Ranko Zdravkovic, a Serb from Gorazdevac in Kosovo-Metohija province, was savagely beaten by two Albanians at the gas station near the town of Pec.
“I stopped by the gas station and while I was waiting in queue two Albanians came up to me and started beating me for no reason. I fell next to my car after several punches, while they continued to hit me, cursing and threatening to slit my throat,” Zdravkovic, who managed to escape after a woman he was driving started calling for help, was quoted.
Zdravkovic sustained numerous injuries to his head and chest and was taken to the emergency hospital unit for urgent medical assistance.
Supervised Autonomy Instead of Supervised Independence
Meanwhile, several hundred kilometers up north, in Belgrade, Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica presented to the ambassadors of the UN Security Council member states Serbia’s official stands on settlement of the future status of Kosovo and Metohija, which envisage supervised autonomy instead of supervised independence, according to Tanjug news agency.
Kostunica had informed the Mission members that Martti Ahtisaari’s plan not only violates the basic principles of the international legal order and the UN Charter, but also includes a shut-down solution with no possibilities of future reevaluations.
Serbia, on the other hand, proposed supervised autonomy instead of supervised independence, which would open possibilities for establishing a process that can be further adapted to the changing circumstances. Once granted, independence may never again be revoked despite the fact that granting independence violates the law, while changes are possible only when the autonomy principle is implemented and international law is respected.
Kosovo Apartheid
Serbia’s Prime Minister pointed out that reports submitted by UNMIK chiefs twice a year to the Security Council did not conform to real situation in Kosovo and Metohija, emphasizing that two thirds of the Serbian and non-Albanian population had been expelled from Serbian province, 200,000 Serbs cannot return to their homes, churches and monasteries are being destroyed even though many of them are under UNESCO protection, Serbian houses are demolished and looted, Serbs in Kosovo province are exposed to daily attacks, ethnically motivated violence and abductions are the most common news coming from the southern province since the summer of 1999.
Kostunica stressed that Serbs live in isolated enclaves which are virtual ghettos, without the most basic freedoms like freedom of movement, they are victims of ethnically motivated violence on a daily basis, and the perpetrators of the attacks are never found or punished.
Prime Minister pointed to the fact that 40,000 Serbs lived in Pristina before NATO aggression, while now there are only 87 Serbs living in that city and asked why Serbs, who are unable to return to remote areas, are also unable to return to the big cities, such as Pistina. Kosunica said there was no multi-ethnicity in Kosovo and Metohija and that today the only multi-ethnic town in the province was Northern Mitrovica, where majority of Serbs reside.
He said Serbia expected the Security Council to ensure the return of 200,000 expelled Serbs and to start real negotiations on the future status of the Province. Kostunica also asked the UN SC Mission to consistently review the implementation of standards from Resolution 1244.
Britain’s Pierce Offers Personal Interpretation of the International Law
Deputy Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations Karen Pierce gave her interpretation of the UNSC Resolution 1244 at the meeting, claiming that it “does not guarantee territorial integrity of Serbia but enables the United Nations to establish a political process which will lead to setting up of provisional institutions of self-government in Kosovo and creation of preconditions for the process of talks on the status.”

Serbian refugees want to go home: More than 10,000 Serbs purged from Kosovo-Metohija province have gathered at Jarinje crossing hoping to plead with the UN Ambassadors to be allowed to return to their homes.
Prime Minister replied that he disagrees with such interpretation, but added that even if it were correct, the Securty Council would still be obligated to act in accordance with the UN Charter. Kostunica explained to Mrs. Pierce that Security Council may not violate its own basic act — the UN Charter — which guarantees sovereignty and territorial integrity of all of the member states, nor may its own Resolution 1244 be contrary to the institution’s Charter.
Pierce then cited the statement of NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer that the proposal for essential autonomy may not be implemented because it would require a large number of foreign troops to supervise such autonomy.
Rejecting that argument, Kostunica stressed that the number of deployed troops, as a matter of convenience to the Western states that deployed them, is not a core issue that could be decisive in determining if part of a state should be severed, reiterating that the condition for NATO to end its aggression against Serbia in 1999 was withdrawal of all Serbian police and army forces, after which KFOR, i.e. NATO states, had assumed responsibility for maintenance of peace and order in the territory of Kosovo-Metohija province.
Albanians a Minority in Serbia, With Albania as Their Ethnic State
The newly appointed U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Zalmay Khalilzad asked what would Serbia do in case the SC backs the essence of Ahtisaari’s proposal, assessing that the SC is also faced with a serious issue and difficult options.
Premier Kostunica refused to get involved in such a hypothetical discussion, reiterating Serbia’s stand that the SC may not violated the UN Charter, because it would question itself.
French Ambassador in the UN said that the Security Council is in a difficult position, because it is being faced with “two contradictory international legal principles,” the principle of respect of territorial integrity and sovereignty of independent states on the one hand, and the right to self-determination, on the other.
Kostunica replied that the right to self-determination may not apply to an ethnic minority, and the Albanians are definitely an ethnic minority in Serbia, which they also were in previous Yugoslavia, because Albania is their ethnic state.
If such a principle were to be forced on Serbia regarding one of its ethnic minorities, then other ethnic minorities, not only in Europe but from all over the world, would claim their right to their own state, starting from the Hungarians in Romania, Hungarians in Slovakia, Serbs in Croatia, Catalonians in Spain, the Premier said.
Kostunica pointed out that the right to self-determination had been applied to former colonies and people who were under colonial governments, while the Albanians in the territory of southern Serbian province had never been in such position, since Kosovo-Metohija is an integral part of Serbian, not of Albanian state.
Third Option That Was Never Considered
South Africa’s UN Ambassador Dumisani Kumalo asked Kostunica about “the third way”, or what Serbia proposed as an alternative to the possibilities presented by the international community so far — either the status quo or the internationally supervised independence.
After hearing the arguments of Serbian government representatives, Kumalo said he “no longer views the issue as a straight choice between independence or not.”
“Until now an opinion prevailed that there were just two solutions,” Kumalo said, represented as “Serbian insistence on sovereignty versus a plan by Martti Ahtisaari” giving virtual independence to Serbia’s province.
After learning about Serbia’s proposition of the supervised autonomy, South Africa’s UN Ambassador said: “Now, after what you told us and explained, we see things differently.”
More Than 10,000 Albanians Live in Belgrade
The UN ambassadors also asked about the way Belgrade envisaged life with Albanians given the history of animosity and conflict between the two nations.
Kostunica responded by giving the examples of the Albanian minority in the south of Serbia proper, living in Presevo, Bujanovac and Medvedja, showing that Serbs and Albanians can live together. Another proof of Serbia’s ability to accommodate other cultures and ethnic and religious groups including Albanians is the fact that over 10,000 ethnic Albanians live in Belgrade, showing that there is trust in the wider layers of society.
A New Outlook
Prime Minister’s adviser, Vladeta Jankovic told Tanjug that many members of the Mission had acquired a new perspective on Serbia’s view of a possible resolution of the Kosovo crisis.
He evaluated that the general impression from the meeting, which lasted an hour and a half, was that many of the ambassadors “got a completely new outlook on the entire set of problems, particularly Serbia’s vision of a possible solution, which would guarantee both preservation of the UN Charter and the ‘holy principle’ of multi ethnic coexistence.”
Detailed Evidence of Ethnic Cleansing, Persecution and Human Rights Violations — Complete Absence of Efforts to Implement Resolution 1244
Coordinators of the negotiating team Slobodan Samardzic and Leon Kojen, as well as President of the Coordination Center Sanda Raskovic-Ivic also met with the ambassadors.

Serbian women from Kosovo-Metohija province holding pictures of their loved ones missing in Kosovo, gathered in front of Serbia’s government building in Belgrade during the visit of UNSC Ambassadors.
During the meeting with the UN Ambassadors, Slobodan Samardzic expounded on negotiations on the future status of Kosovo-Metohija that took place in Vienna, under Ahtisaari’s guidance.
Samardzic recalled that only one of those meetings was organised on top level — on June 24, 2006, whereas 15 meetings referred to technical issues, noting that from September 2006 to February 2007 there was not a single meeting. He added that after Ahtisaari presented his proposal, meetings referred only to six chapters of that plan while seven chapters were never discussed. Samardzic also said it was indicative that more than 500 amendments that Belgrade proposed were flatly rejected, while the Albanian ones were approved and included into the Finn’s proposal.
Speaking about the meeting with the UNSC Ambassadors, Slobodan Samardzic said that Serbian government presented evidence of assaults on Serbs in the province, ethnically motivated violence, abductions, even desecration of graves, which should enable the mission to learn the truth for the first time on Serbia’s southern province.
The evidence presented to the UNSC mission consists of thousand-page files, CDs and documents detailing all ethnically motivated crimes against Serbs in the Province during past eight years, the non existence of investigations in the crimes, as well as precise data on the number of Serbs who have been expelled and who are living in collective centers. “They are aware of some things, but they do not know what was really happening because the reports of UN officials to the SC were mostly cosmetically touched up to conceal the truth. This is the first opportunity for them to learn about the real situation and their visit is therefore very important,” Samardzic told Serbian TV.
He expressed his conviction that Kosovo-Metohija province will not be independent, adding that there is a growing understanding that there can be no speedy solution and that the issue of Serbia’s southern province requires new negotiations, which means that resolving the status issue will take some time.
According to Samardzic, the mission will not visit the administrative boundary between Serbia proper and its Kosovo province, where more than 10,000 Serbian Kosovo-Metohija refugees have gathered over night and during the day, although the ambassadors were asked to do so.
7,000 Ethnically Motivated Attacks Since 1999
Coordination Council for Kosovo and Metohija President Sanda Raskovic-Ivic brought to the attention of the SC Mission facts that in Kosovo-Metohija province, according to UNHCR data, five percent of the expelled have returned, while according to data of the Serbian institutions the real number was less than two percent.
Since 1999 there have been 7,000 attacks on Serbs, of which 4,500 with firearms and 931 Serbs have been killed. UNMIK is conducting an investigation into only 90 cases, Raskovic-Ivic conveyed to the Ambassadors.