U.S. State Department Blitzkrieg Against Serbia
Clintonites and Blairites Fight for Kosovo Albanian Terrorists in the UN Security Council
As Clintons’ cherished allies Kosovo Albanian terrorists revert to their true nature of criminal, violent, abusive thugs after few excruciating years of sweating under the masks of benevolence and victimhood, plotting to attack U.S. Army bases, both in Kosovo-Metohija and in States, Clintonian State Department — still in power under the Bush administration — doubles its efforts to grant the terrorists’ wish and amputate Kosovo province from Serbia.
Taking over the UN Security Council presidency during the month of May, fanatical Washington bureaucrats have launched a blitzkrieg for securing planned dismemberment of Serbian state during their reign. Along with equally fanatical Blairites, Clintonites have written a proposal for the new UN SC resolution and thrown it into the lap of France, to be formally submitted by an EU member state.
Russia, which is together with China, South Africa and Slovakia, among other UN SC member states, opposed to tearing Serbia apart in order to form a second Albanian Muslim state on Serbian territory, has submitted its own draft resolution, strongly backed by Belgrade.
Russia Seeks Upholding International Law, Washington-London Press for International Thuggery
Russian document, which the Serbian news agency Tanjug had an insight into, contains serious reserve towards Ahtisaari’s proposal for Kosovo-Metohija province and implies a resumption of negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina that would lead to mutually acceptable solutions.
The “French proposal”, which is dubbed Elements and which Tanjug also had an insight into, practically opens the door to the implementation of Ahtisaari’s plan for which it has been impossible to obtain majority support from Security Council member countries.
The elements of a future resolution on Kosovo, proposed by Russia, contain recommendations for the Security Council to express dissatisfaction over poor progress regarding the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1244 signed in 1999.
Russia also demands that the UN Security Council ensures a resumption of the Belgrade-Pristina negotiations and, at the same time, that it takes into consideration Serbian proposal for the resolution of the Kosovo issue. Belgrade, as the Security Council fact finding mission learned during its last-month visit to Serbia, proposes basic, supervised independence for its southern province.
Russia also suggests that the new UN resolution on Serbian Kosovo province demands a complete fulfillment of Resolution 1244 and creation of a multiethnic society in the province, with a full protection for all holy sights of religious or historical importance.
At the same time, Russian proposal also requests a step-by-step realization of the future agreement on Kosovo-Metohija province status settlement.
The “French” draft resolution requires that the clauses of the new resolution replace the previous Security Council resolutions dedicated to Serbian Kosovo province, as well as that the mandate of UNMIK and KFOR be limited to 120 days, a deadline which is also to represent a transitional period between the current rule in Kosovo-Metohija and the establishment of future international and local mechanisms of authority, as envisaged by Ahtisaari’s plan as well.
Washington-London scribes hiding behind France also demand that the Security Council recognized the non-existent “progress which had been made in the realization of standards,” requiring that both sides restrained themselves from using violence as means for resolving problems.
Restraint from the use of violence is the sole issue the Russian and Clinton-Blair representatives agree upon.
Strache Warns President Fischer Serbia Has Rights Too
Leader of the parliamentary Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) Heinz Christian Strache on Tuesday warned Austrian President Heinz Fischer who, together with Croatian President Stjepan Mesic, gave support to the Ahtisaari’s plan on Monday, that he needs to take into consideration Serbian interests when making such assessments.
Asserting that an autonomy within Serbia should be viewed as a valid option in regards to Kosovo-Metohija’s future status, Strache pointed out in a statement that Ahtisaari’s proposal seeks to grant independence to the ancient Serbian territory.
The leader of Austria’s parliamentary party underscored it would be welcomed if the European Union and United Nations did not focus their attention on dismembering Serbia, but rather discussed the issue of the expelled after the World War I and the right to self-determination of the Italian province of South Tyrol.
Slovakia: Serbia’s Interests Have to Be Respected
In an interview to Austrian daily Kurier, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said that his country, unlike Austrian leadership, approaches the Kosovo-Metohija issue with Serbia’s interests in mind.
“When I put myself in the position of Serbs, it feels very bad. Slovakia will seek compromise within the European Union. We want to prevent a 10:0 score against Serbia,” stressed Premier of Slovakia, which is also a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council.
Fico underscored that the stability of the region has to be preserved, adding unilateral recognition of the independence of southern Serbian province would cause “a catastrophe.”
Cartoon by Nikola Otas (Serbia)
Comments
As Serbia's parliament elected a pro-Russian speaker, the European Union officials are issuing stern warnings to the Serbs (according to mass media outlets), but they are still reluctant to question their own mistakes in the ex-Yugoslavia, and this is unlikely to change any time soon, unfortunately. Does anyone remember that German/Austrian premature recognition of Slovenia and Croatia sparked wars in the former Yugoslavia? This mistake (assuming it was a mistake) led to a brutal civil war between Yugoslavia’s Catholic Croats, Bosnian Muslims, Albanian Muslims and orthodox Christian Serbs. As a consequence, almost entire Serb population was expelled from Croatia, from Muslim-Croat parts of Bosnia (most drastic example is the capital Sarajevo, where the Serb population declined from approx 40% before the 1992-1995 war to 1% now), and from Kosovo.
Now, when the Croats are still obstructing the return of more than 100,000 expelled Serbs to their homes in Croatia, the EU is preparing ground to admit Croatia to full membership of the EU. Additionally, the EU is currently advocating dismembering of Serbia by supporting the secession of Muslim-Albanians from Serbia. (Currently in Kosovo’s capital, Pristina, only 14 (fourteen) Serbs are surviving, according to reports, out of 40,000 before the EU/NATO-led military took control of
Pristina.
After everything the EU decision makers “have done for” (or to) the Serbs, they still believe that they have some credibility amongst the Serbs. To someone who truly understands the Serbs, it comes as no surprise that more and more Serbs are going off the idea of joining the EU.
Posted by: Tide | May 10, 2007 02:16 PM
Warnings and threats from the West regarding Mr. Nikolic's election as the president of the parliament are so deeply insulting and humiliating it is difficult to find the proper words to describe it. Do Serbs get to tell Germans, French, Brits and the rest who can and who can not preside over their parliaments?! This is beyond insulting, I can hardly believe it.
Tomislav Nikolic is not only representing the strongest party that won most votes in the elections, but the parliament procedure for his election couldn't have been more democratic, open and clean. It only goes to show EU does indeed view Serbia as its colony. Obviously, Serbia today is not a free country, it is being ruled by the foreigners and foreign-financed interest groups.
The "punishment" in the form of not raising the EU flag on the Serbian Parliament building is hilarious, though. Personally, I'm quite grateful that stinky piece of cloth will not be hung anywhere in my hometown - they can shove it (perhaps up Slovenian butts if no other place can be found on such a short notice).
Posted by: Svetlana | May 10, 2007 09:41 PM
I agree that “the punishment” by self-perpetuating rulers of “the soviet-Europe” (not sure where the-former East Germany belongs) is pathetic, although it shows how stupid the new Soviet-EU rulers are.
However, the Serbians need to be reminded that in the eyes of the Soviet-EU, Serbia is still firmly located in the old-old Eastern Europe (Tito, Stalin…) – politically, religiously, economically…Theoretically, there is nothing wrong with such attitude, and Serbian population understands this, judging by election of Mr Nikolic in the position of parliamentary speaker. However, although Serbia is not a member of the soviet-EU, Soviet-EU politicians (read Solana) still have audacity to instruct Serbian leaders how to compose any future Serbian government. Anyone in the Soviet-EU understands what is meant by democracy?
Sadly, the threats worked yet again in Serbia!
PS. Maybe all these Soviet-EU threats are made for altruistic reasons? Well, I'am too old to be so naive...
Posted by: Tide | May 11, 2007 05:16 PM
The WORST part, in my opinion, is the fact that the threats worked and that some Serbs (gathered around Soros-funded worm-farms) made even more noise, bought all the crap and have gotten scared shitless of what the EU is gonna say.
Bloody morons! As if anyone ON EARTH listens to Solana and Rehn - Serbia is the only province in the world where Solana's and Rehn's words are actually reported, as if the EU is not falling apart as we speak, as if they have the right to sanction Serbia for electing "unsuitable" parliament speaker.
With such spineless, mindless worms wiggling throughout Serbia, we don't need an enemy, we're ready to self-destruct. Disgusting.
Posted by: Svetlana | May 11, 2007 05:51 PM
One Step Forward: Electing Nikolic, Two Steps back: Composite Minority (Pro-Reform) Government. The political dance Waltz' on.
I think a new election would've been better... but what can you do except look on, at least from where I am. It would be nice if we had a leader with enough spine to rub the EU/US noses in the variety of terror plots (Fort Dix, 7/7, 9/11) and Terrorist Cells (UCC in Epirus) that they have created (Crap) so that they can never get the smell out of their pompous self-absorbed noses or wash the blood from their hands.
But we can atleast hope that with some luck and maybe Karma turning in Serbia's favor we may get out of this with some Dignity. Here's hoping when the US/EU loses that the KLA gives those Congressmen and Parlamentarians that they bought some pink slips.
As a good Christian though I'd rather they just crapped their pants then get whats coming to them because we can't really wish evil on others.
Posted by: Spectacles | May 11, 2007 10:08 PM
Exactly, Spectacles! Although, I'm afraid they'll get what's coming to them no matter how hard we wish for them to avoid the experience. There's a clear distinction between making a mistake and jumping into a sh.. hole with eyes wide open.
Somehow, I don't think the EU/US is merely making one mistake after another regarding the Balkans' Muslims for almost two decades now. Serbs keep yelling: Watch out, nothing but pain awaits you at the end of that road (we've been there)! but not many seem to be listening... so, whatever. Let them.
Posted by: Svetlana | May 11, 2007 11:24 PM
I don't suppose it will ever come to an apology from the West, their far too pompous to admit that they made a mistake... I just wish there were more solidarity amongst the people of Serbia, where is their Inat? Its as if they are already losing their Spirit...
Perhaps its time the Clergy made their Presence felt, to walk amongst the people. I would love to hear that the Priests of Serbia began to walk amongst the people I think it would lift their spirits (or fill them with gloom and doom, may want to opt out of the black robes and try to put on some cheerful faces). Speak to the people, give them Hope. Maybe Sing, let the Choir voices carry a hopeful Melody but outside In the Sun, with the wind to carry the message.
Not a very Traditional Orthodox approach (In recent times atleast) perhaps but it wouldn't hurt to try a new Initiative, didn't Jesus talk on hills, lake/sea shores, under trees and in open fields? If we of the Orthodox faith are the closest to the Original Church of Jesus, should we not employ His methods to teach and spread Hope?
Posted by: Spectacles | May 12, 2007 12:06 AM