« June 2007 | Main | August 2007 »

July 31, 2007

UN Ethics Office Expected to Act

Growing hotter

Ahtisaari Bribery Allegations: UN Ethics Office Now Officially Informed

Letter sent by American Council for Kosovo Director James Jatras on July 31, 2007, to Mr. Robert F. Benson, Esq., Director of Ethics Office at United Nations Headquarters, First Avenue at 46th Street, New York, NY 10017

Attached references:
(1) J.G. Jatras/Ban Ki-moon letter, July 24, 2007;
(2) Global Information System/Defense & Foreign Affairs Special AnalysisEvidence That UN Special Envoy for Kosovo Martti Ahtisaari Received Albanian Mafia Bribes for Kosovo Independence,” July 10, 2007

Dear Mr. Benson:

I am writing to you with regard to my letter to the Secretary General of July 24, 2007, with the referenced GIS/D&FA Special Analysis, concerning a matter directly within the area of responsibility of the Ethics Office. The contents of the referenced letter and the attached analysis are self-explanatory.

Given the Secretary General’s emphasis on anti-corruption and ethical standards at the United Nations, and your own extensive experience in this field, I am confident you and your office are giving this matter the serious attention it deserves. Especially in light of the severity of the allegations against Mr. Ahtisaari, it is clear that even information from an anonymous whistleblower would trigger a transparent and in-depth inquiry, and these allegations certainly are based on more than that. If you wish, I can put you in direct contact with the head of the GIS/D&FA organization which issued the special analysis.

I respectfully request that you confirm, as a matter of public record, the actions that are being taken by the Ethics Office to look into this affair. I look forward to your earliest reply and can be reached directly at my office at 202.626.6248 or by e-mail at jjatras@ssd.com; I will plan to check with your office by telephone in the very near future.

James George Jatras
Director, American Council for Kosovo


Blood Money

How Can You Help

In addition to signing the petition requesting full and transparent UN investigation into the allegations of former UN Special Envoy for Kosovo Martti Ahtisaari being bribed by Albanian Mafia to rig the Kosovo province negotiations and propose severing of the southern Serbian province to the UN Security Council, you can also help by writing to the UN Ethics Office Director, Mr. Robert Benson, at ethicsoffice@un.org.

July 30, 2007

Petition Demanding UN Investigation Into Ahtisaari Bribery

Ahtisaari payments

Petition Demanding UN Investigation Into Ahtisaari Bribery

Created by: MV Pejakovich & Concerned Citizens for UN & US Integrity

Sign the Petition to Demand an Investigation of former UN Special Envoy for Kosovo, Marti Ahtisaari, that he was paid by the Albanian mafia to produce his recommendations for the future status of Kosovo

To: UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, US Pres George W. Bush, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice

Summary:

We the undersigned demand of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the Bush Administration, a full, speedy and transparent, investigation regarding the allegations made against former UN Special Envoy for Kosovo, Marti Ahtisaari, that he was paid by the Albanian mafia to produce his recommendations for the future status of Kosovo as an independent entity, with the results of this investigation to made public. Further, we demand to know whether or not the specific German BND report mentioned below does exist and, if so, who else is implicated in this corruption scandal and what the evidence it against them. Finally, we want to know what action has been and will be taken by the UN, should any and all of these allegation prove true.

Full Petition:

1. Whereas, on The Finnish News Agency, STT, published on June 26 and June 27, 2007, two articles stating that the UN Special Envoy for Kosovo was “bought” by the Albanian mafia in order to support independence for Kosovo. The STT articles reported that the information was initially published by the Banja Luka (Republica Srpska, Bosnia & Herzegovina) Daily Fokus on June 21, 2007, entitled “The Albanian Mafia Bought Ahtisaari”;

2. Whereas, on July 10, 2007, Defense and Foreign Affairs Special Analysis, Volume XXV, No. 56, a product of the well-respected Global Information Service, issued a report confirmed the following facts regarding the Ahtisaari Bribery allegations:

  • UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon requested that the German Federal Intelligence Service, BND, inform him in detail on what was happening in Kosovo, and he received a detailed report on Special Envoy Ahtisaari’s activities in Kosovo;
  • The UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was informed that Albanian separatists in Kosovo had paid for Ahtisaari’s plan which proposed ultimate independence for the Serbian province;
  • The BND secret service team, headed by Brigadier Luke Neiman, who was directly appointed by the German Government to designate part of the German Secret Service apparatus to the UN Mission in Kosovo (UNOSEK: United Nations Office the Special Envoy for Kosovo), discovered the connection between the Albanian mafia and Marti Ahtisaari. Brig. Neiman had recordings of discussions between Ahtisaari and Albanians; how they transferred money; the banks accounts plus codes in Switzerland and Cyprus;
  • One of the BDN recordings revealed the transportation of two-million euros from the Swiss Bank based in the city of Visalia, account number 239700-93457-00097, owned by Exhet Boria, which was masked by an offshore account with a code XS52-KOLER to Ahtisaari’s bank account in the Bank of Cyprus, account number 3459346699004533, code VOLANND;
  • It was also reported was the visit of two men to UNOSEK, in the presence of Ahtisaari on February 12, 2007, at 06:23 hrs (local time) in one black Mercedes four-wheel drive SUV, with license plate PR-443-22CD, which was confirmed to belong to the Albanian Government in Prishtina. The two visitors carried two silver briefcases which were handed to Ahtisaari. A source inside the UNOSEK facilities confirmed that the briefcases contained cash and were delivered to the UN Special Envoy for Kosovo. Twelve days later, at 17:44 hrs (local), the same car, with the license plates removed, visited UNOSEK but this time it was Exhet Boria himself and two bodyguards that entered the building, carrying again two silver briefcases. Exhet Boria is a Kosovo Albanian figure involved in organized crime and heroin trade in Europe and he is the “right hand” of Behgjet Pacolli, the Albanian billionaire mafia boss, living in Switzerland. The BND agents realized that the four briefcases had diplomatic luggage labels, and noted that they finally arrived in Finland without being checked -- because of the diplomatic tagging -- and were delivered at Ahtisaari’s house. The briefcase cash totaled 40-million euros;
  • The German agents also confirmed that Ahtisaari had many telephone conversations with Behgjet Pacolli. Furthermore, on February 28, 2007, at 23:47 hrs (local), the BND agents noted the arrival of a NATO KFOR (Kosovo Force) four-wheel drive vehicle carrying two women who were followed by Boria’s bodyguard. The women stayed in Ahtisaari’s quarters until 05:17 hrs next day, and left with the same car;
  • The office of the UN Special Envoy for Kosovo responded to STT that “this is a silly story that comes from the press of Serbia (Bosnia & Herzegovina). We have nothing to add”, said Remi Dourlot, Ahtisaari’s spokesman based in Vienna. According to STT, the accusations where not commented on by the UN or by Ahtisaari himself;
  • The President of the National Assembly of Serbia, Oliver Dulic, has made a formal inquiry into the allegations in order to confirm Ahtisaari’s involvement with Albanian organized crime;
  • The GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs station in south-eastern Europe has conducted research in the Balkans and from secure sources it was revealed that the BND report does indeed exist, and that the information contained is not “Serbian fiction” but a reality;
  • The same research also revealed additional secure and confirmed information that the former KLA leader, Hashim Thaci (also known as “the snake” of KLA), had made a plan of “100 days” for Kosovo’s independence. The first session of the Kosovo Parliament would, under the plan, then decide and announce Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence (UDI);
  • Meanwhile, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs sources confirmed that the BND report also contained extensive additional information on the involvement in corrupt activities of other international community personalities involved in Kosovo;

3. Whereas, James Jatras, Director of the American Council for Kosovo, in a letter dated, July 24, 2007, has already asked that Secretary General of the UN, Ban Ki Moon, publicly confirm or deny the existence of the BND report on Ahtisaari, as described in the GIS/D&FA Special Analysis above, and also demanded the status of the investigation on Ahtisaari. Copies of this letter were also forwarded to members of Congress and the Media;

4. Whereas, “The Ahtisaari Plan for Kosovo” encourages UN member states to violate the charter of the United Nations, violate the precepts of the “Helsinki Final Act” (signed by 35 member states in 1975, including the United States, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Vatican, and what was Soviet Union and Yugoslavia), and violate UN SC Resolution 1244 which specifically preserves Serbia’s territorial integrity.

5. Whereas, the Bush Administration’s position on the issue of Kosovo has been in support of “The Ahtisaari Plan”, and there is evidence pointing to the Ahtisaari Plan’s recommendations having been the result of corruption;

We, the undersigned, demand of UN Secretary Ban Ban Ki-moon and the Bush Administration, a full and transparent investigation of the Ahtisaari corruption allegations in public view. If Mr. Ahtisaari is innocent, he deserves to have his names cleared of such allegations. If not, we want to know the evidence against him. We want to know if the above-mentioned BND report does exist, and if so, what additional information on the involvement in corrupt activities of “other international community personalities involved in Kosovo” this report contains. And if the allegations prove to be substantiated, what action does the UN intend to take to deal with this corruption?

As taxpayers, who tax dollars finance the UN’s entire existence, we are entitled to no less than full disclosure of any potential corruption of the UN -- especially when it affects the foreign policies of nations, leading to potential wars and unnecessarily putting the lives of our military men and women at risk!

Sign the Petition Now!

Well Paid to Promote the Lies

Propaganda

The Force for Good in This World

It’s fairly easy to understand why governments and political elite hiding behind the democracy banner need heavy propaganda to further their goals of dominating the world — basically, the only way to justify occupation and insure long-term pillaging of other countries’ resources and wealth is to make people believe that you are not a mere thug and thief acting out of lust for power and basest greed, but a freedom loving liberator and the “force for good,” prompted to act out of humanitarian concerns and from a moral high-ground we, the commoners, can hardly properly grasp.

Hysterical Masses — a Key to New Wars

So first, the Clintons, the Blairs, the Bushes et al need to create a crisis centered around The Enemy of the Day and/or Hitler/Stalin of the Year, since it’s much easier to direct the righteous indignation and rage at another person, a figurehead representing the collective, than at a collective itself without a face one can grow to intensely hate.

Then they require loads of black propaganda smearing the Chosen Enemy in so much pooh you can hardly hear his name or look at his face without having a puke-impulse triggered, until the public starts screaming for intervention, for them to “do something!!!,” “stop the genocide,” end the threat, get rid of the dictator, “free his people” from oppression, FREE THE WORLD OF THIS MONSTER!

That level of hysteria unlocks the magic doors and they’re in, doing whatever the hell they please, for as long as they please, ‘cause now they have a “democratic license” of sorts to invade, occupy, kill, destroy, burn and loot to their hearts’ content because, remember, it was you who told them to do it, you begged them to overrun the place and swipe that piece of cake too.

Crucial Role of the Media

On the other hand, it is far less understandable why so many reporters and journalists on whose shoulders the main avalanche of propaganda rests, accept to willingly carry it through, oftentimes knowing fully well that they are lying to themselves and the world, and why would they become so creative on their own to even sink to inventing the gory details and giving substantial contribution in lies to the official Big Lie Number One.

The Benefits of Not Understanding, by Neil Clark

Neil Clark offers couple of clues:

In response to my plea to certain journalists of the liberal left to “wake up” and reconsider their position on the war against Yugoslavia in 1999, Guardian commenter Arabella Mayer writes:

Neil, so-called liberal-left journos will never wake up because, as Upton Sinclair noted: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.”

I always try to be optimistic, but I fear both Arabella and Upton Sinclair are right. I remember being at a party in London on the weekend before the Iraq war. Also at the party was Boris Johnson. I asked him if he honestly believed the guff about the ‘Iraqi threat’ and Saddam’s ‘WMD’. He looked me in the eye, hesitated for a few seconds and replied “You’ve got to admit Saddam’s not a particularly nice chap”.

Roughly translated: Of course I don’t believe all the guff, but I’ve got to somehow justify this war to myself so I can support it and keep my job as editor of a publication owned by the arch neo-con Conrad Black.

Now that his previous, pro-war boss is well out of the picture, Boris has come out and attacked President Bush and his handling of Iraq. But at the time, he felt obliged to support the illegal invasion. Because for Boris, his career came before opposing a war, which he knew in his heart of hearts was wrong. He’s not alone: in any country at any given time, there is a set of ‘approved opinions’ you need to hold—and espouse—to enhance your career. In Britain today it means supporting the ‘special relationship’ with the U.S., the operation of a ‘free market’ economy, where even renationalising the railways is ruled out, despite public support — and extolling the ‘merits’ of globalisation.

Of course dissent is allowed, but only within certain parameters. It is considered acceptable to express disapproval of the way the Iraq war has been executed (but not of the basic idea behind it). And it is not acceptable to criticise the 1999 war against Yugoslavia, which still, officially, is classified as a ‘humanitarian intervention’ and a ‘great success’.

It’s acknowledging this which explains why, despite the non-existent genocide, and non-existent mass graves, so few journalists and politicians have actually come out and said they got Kosovo horribly wrong. School and university fees, and no doubt the odd new kitchen extension, have been paid because journalists in Britain and the US did not print the truth back in 1999. Had they ‘understood’ what was really going on, and exposed it in print, they and their families would not be as well-off as they are today.

July 29, 2007

Hot Serbian Summer

Warmest day in Serbia
Scorching heatwave that has hit south-eastern Europe in Serbia peaked on July 23, with thermometers close to bursting at 46 degrees Celsius (114.8 Fahrenheit).

Europe’s Deadly Summer

Between the torrential rains flooding the North-West and blistering heat scorching the South-East, Europe has rarely seen a deadlier summer than June-July 2007. Hundreds of people lost their lives due to heatstroke, cardiovascular problems and other illnesses aggravated by the heat, with Hungary reporting the highest number of deaths—up to 500—in the latest heatwave.

Thanks to alertness and efficiency of the medical staff working day and night without a break, as if the state was under national emergency, Serbia did not have a single case of death caused by the heat, but the raging fires that have ripped through the entire region, including Greece and Italy, have destroyed large areas of forests and a significant quantity of annual crops in Serbia too.

Belgrade fountain
Belgrade fountains turned invaluable for all its residents.

Ilyushin to Rescue

Russian water-bomber Ilyushin Il-76TD was sent upon the explicit instruction by the President Vladimir Putin to join Serbian firefighters, army, police and population and help combat the fires cropping up like wild mushrooms after rain.

Three days later all of some 50-plus fires were extinguished and under control. Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica thanked the 11 Russian pilots and crew members and invited them to spend holidays with their families in Serbia.

Meanwhile, the police has determined that some fires raging across Stara planina (Old Mountain) were caused by human carelessness and negligence (a shepherd from the village of Izvor who discarded lit cigarette butt into dry grass, three beekeepers suspected of causing the fire near the village of Temska by blowing smoke into their beehives and a woman who lit a heap of dry grass and hay in her backyard with the blaze rapidly spreading onto the nearby pine forest). The criminal complaints against suspects are expected to be filed and the perpetrators arrested.

Watermelon Fest
Watermelon Fest in the Osipaonica village, near the city of Smederevo, Serbia.

Watermelon Fest and Youth Olympics in Serbia

With the fires being extinguished and temperatures returning to normal, the Serbs are back to finding fun ways to cool off. After shooting “Serbian Scars” was just finished and with Watermelon Fest in full swing, they also hosted this year’s European Youth Olympics Festival (EYOF), reveling in the highest grades received for the Belgrade Olympic village and organization of the games, with the President of the International Olympic Committee Jacques Rogge stating this was “one of the best organized events in a 16-year old tradition of this sports manifestation.”

Save for the few odd German tourists here and there, the hot Serbian summer seems to be proceeding in the right direction after all, with today’s triumph of the youngest generation of Serbian basketball players who won gold at the U16 championship in Greece (with Dejan Musli named the MVP of the tournament), joining their waterpolo compatriots who won gold in the European Youth Olympics Festival two days ago in Belgrade.

July 28, 2007

Corrupt Finn Must be Held Responsible

Hooked

The Useless Whore

“One rule pimps go by is that no whore, no matter how ugly, should ever be let loose unless she is so useless that business suffers.

“The business of settling the status of Kosovo has forever died at the UN and the person responsible for rendering the status talks so useless and dead has been Martti Ahtisaari,” wrote M. Bozinovich in the recent “Pimp Acumen for Martti,” at the time when the noise coming from the Finn’s office suggested ol’ Martti would like to stay in the game, even though no one wants him.

No one except, perhaps, his Kosovo Albanian customers who have invested a substantial portion of their heroin earnings in Martti’s services.

Finn Has Finished With Us

Soon after, the Finn finally realized he’s Finnished:

“Having witnessed the humiliating defeat of his proposal for an Albanian-dominated ‘Kosova’ as a ward of the EU, former president of Finland and ICG board member Martti Ahtisaari told the Finnish Radio he would no longer be involved with Empire’s land-grab from Serbia. He could contribute in an ‘advisory role,’ he told the media hopefully, but noted no one’s asked him to do so,” reported Nebojsa Malic, adding the corrupt UN employee now “just has to hope the Albanians won’t ask for their money back, the same way they’ve been ‘asking’ for land...”

...But We’re Not Done With Him. Yet.

But while Martti may like to think he’s Finnished with us and that the worst thing that could possibly happen to him now would be to face an official representative of his collective customer—Kosovo Albanians—in some dark alley late at night, I’m afraid that we’re not quite done with him. Not until he comes out of his rathole and faces the responsibility for his crime, i.e. taking bribes as a UN Special Envoy for Serbian Kosovo-Metohija province in order to rig negotiations and propose severing of the part of Serbian territory to the UN Security Council.

When Was the UN Ethics Office Engaged Over Ahtisaari Case?

On July 24 American Council for Kosovo Director James Jatras wrote a letter to the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon [PDF format], requesting some badly needed clarifications and investigation. The letter reads:

Dear Mr. Secretary General:

I am writing to you with respect to a matter of great urgency in light of your stated commitment to anti-corruption and the numerous questions that have been raised concerning past standards of ethics and accountability at the UN.

Attached is a Defense & Foreign Affairs Special Analysis dated July 10, 2007, entitled “Evidence That UN Special Envoy for Kosovo Martti Ahtisaari Received Albanian Mafia Bribes for Kosovo Independence.” Issued by the Global Information System (GIS) of the Washington-based International Strategic Studies Association (ISSA), the analysis states GIS’s confirmation, from its independent research and sources, of the existence of a report to you by the German intelligence service BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst) regarding payments made to Mr. Ahtisaari by Albanian organized crime figures.

You are to be commended for your insistence that “we must hold all UN employees to the highest standards of integrity and ethical behaviour” (address to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, January 16, 2007), and your pledge of a “zero tolerance” standard against corruption in the UN. On that basis, it is clear that these charges against Mr. Ahtisaari must not be dismissed without due inquiry. I respectfully request that you respond for the record to the following questions:

  1. Will you confirm or deny the existence of the BND report described in the GIS/D&FA Special Analysis?
  2. Will you disclose when this matter was referred to the recently established UN Ethics Office, which reports directly to you, and what has been that office’s action to date?

Thank you for your prompt attention to this critical matter.

James George Jatras
Director, American Council for Kosovo

GIS Report

The attached GIS report UN Secretary General also received courtesy of Mr. Jatras, Evidence That UN Special Envoy for Kosovo Marti Ahtisaari Received Albanian Mafia Bribes for Kosovo Independence is available as another .pdf file here.

July 27, 2007

Seizure of Serbian Province Impermissible

NATO world
The world without the law — U.S.-led NATO world.

Putin: Seizure of Serbian Province Impermissible

“While Serbia defends its territorial integrity, Russia stresses that the peace in Europe should rest on norms of international law,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said at a ceremony of receiving credentials from ambassadors of several states on Friday.

“Today, the people of Serbia are defending the sovereignty and territorial integrity of their country. Our stance is well known — the peace in Europe cannot be built without consideration for basic norms of international law, including the principles of the Helsinki Final Act,” Putin said.

According to Helsinki Final Act Most Western States are Thugs and Criminals

The Helsinki Final Act, signed by 35 states, including United States, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Vatican, and what was Soviet Union and Yugoslavia back in 1975 stresses in the clear-cut terms that participating states:

  • [...] will respect each other's sovereign equality and individuality as well as all the rights inherent in and encompassed by its sovereignty, including in particular the right of every State to juridical equality, to territorial integrity and to freedom and political independence [...] They consider that their frontiers can be changed, in accordance with international law, by peaceful means and by agreement.
  • [...] will refrain [...] from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations and with the present Declaration. No consideration may be invoked to serve to warrant resort to the threat or use of force in contravention of this principle [...]
  • [...] they will refrain from any manifestation of force for the purpose of inducing another participating State to renounce the full exercise of its sovereign rights.

PSYWAR against Serbia
“The participating States will refrain [...] from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State [...] No consideration may be invoked to serve to warrant resort to the threat or use of force in contravention of this principle,” Helsinki Final Act.

Photo: Version of leaflets NATO bombers were dropping on Yugoslavia during the U.S.-led 1999 aggression. Click to view large

  • The participating States regard as inviolable all one another's frontiers [...] and therefore they will refrain now and in the future from assaulting these frontiers. Accordingly, they will also refrain from any demand for, or act of, seizure and usurpation of part or all of the territory of any participating State.
  • [They] will respect the territorial integrity of each of the participating States [...and] refrain from any action inconsistent with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations against the territorial integrity, political independence or the unity of any participating State, and in particular from any such action constituting a threat or use of force.
  • The participating States will likewise refrain from making each other's territory the object of military occupation or other direct or indirect measures of force in contravention of international law, or the object of acquisition by means of such measures or the threat of them. No such occupation or acquisition will be recognized as legal.
  • [They] will settle disputes among them by peaceful means in such a manner as not to endanger international peace and security, and justice. They will endeavour in good faith and a spirit of co-operation to reach a rapid and equitable solution on the basis of international law.
  • For this purpose they will use such means as negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement or other peaceful means [...] In the event of failure to reach a solution by any of the above peaceful means, the parties to a dispute will continue to seek a mutually agreed way to settle the dispute peacefully.
  • Participating States, parties to a dispute among them, as well as other participating States, will refrain from any action which might aggravate the situation to such a degree as to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security and thereby make a peaceful settlement of the dispute more difficult.
  • The participating States will refrain from any intervention, direct or indirect, individual or collective, in the internal or external affairs falling within the domestic jurisdiction of another participating State, regardless of their mutual relations.
  • They will accordingly refrain from any form of armed intervention or threat of such intervention against another participating State.
  • They will likewise in all circumstances refrain from any other act of military, or of political, economic or other coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by another participating State of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.
  • Accordingly, they will, inter alia, refrain from direct or indirect assistance to terrorist activities, or to subversive or other activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another participating State.
Nazi NATO

...And They Know It

Now, one of the first thoughts that comes to mind after reading this is to print out the integral text of Helsinki Final Act and send it to each member of the U.S. State Department, U.S. Senate, Congress and White House, to each of the bureaucrats in London’s No. 10 Downing Street and all of the British MPs, to The Palais de l' Elysée, German Bundestag and elsewhere, just so the signatories get informed about the heaps of laws they violated during the butchering of former Yugoslavia, with ruthless NATO aggression, during the series of color-coded revolutions they swiped the Eastern Europe with by enthroning Western servants and sycophants, and in their ongoing war against Serbia and Russia.

But, on second thought, it becomes obvious the thugs are already well acquainted with the document they signed, except that they prefer to treat is as To Do list.

Take a look at diagram that shows Nazi swastika is built in NATO symbol, from the German web site about swastika symbolism.

July 26, 2007

Carl Savich on Forgotten Kosovo

Crucifixion of Djordje Martinovic
“Crucifixion of Djordje Martinovic,” by the Serbian painter Miodrag Mica Popovic. May 1, 1985.

Djordje (George) Martinovic was a Kosovo Serb tortured and raped with the broken bottle by Albanian Muslims.

Carl Savich on Forgotten Kosovo: Murders, Rapes, and Ethnic Cleansing — Creating an Ethnically Pure “Kosova”, 1981-1989

By Carl Savich

Creating an Ethnically Pure “Kosova”

To understand the Kosovo separatist conflict of 1998-1999, the background must be analyzed and examined. Did the Kosovo conflict emerge sui generis? What was the context and background of the conflict? To understand that, the decade before must be analyzed, the 1980s. Kosovo in the 1980s is where the conflict arose.

From 1981 to 1989, 20,000 Kosovo Serbs are estimated to have fled from Kosovo. There was a massive campaign to drive out the Kosovo Serb population through ethnic murders, rapes, attacks, beatings, desecrations of churches, cemeteries. From 1982 to 1984, 10 rapes were committed, while 11 attempted rapes were committed against Serbian women by Albanian men. In this period, 286 crimes were committed against Kosovo Serbs, while 1,249 misdemeanors were committed against Kosovo Serbs.

A Kosovo Albanian Muslim leader, Fadil Hoxha, incited Kosovo Albanians to rape Kosovo Serb women. Kosovo Albanian Muslims engaged in a systematic and planned policy or campaign to expel Kosovo Serb Christians from Kosovo. This ethnically and religious motivated campaign of genocide against Kosovo Serbs has been largely suppressed and censored in the US and the West. Through the infowar technique of “emphasis”, these human rights abuses have been de-emphasized and buried and spin doctored away.

A systematic and planned campaign of ethnic and religious terror whose goal was genocide has been erased and deleted from the historical record. How was this done? What really happened in Kosovo during the 1980s that set the stage for the Kosovo conflict of 1998-1999?

“We Want a Unified Albania”: The 1981 Riots

On April 3-4, 1981, ethnic Albanians demonstrations in Kosovo turned into an armed rebellion to create a Greater Albania. The demonstrations were motivated by separatism and secession. The rioters wanted union with Albania and expressed support for Albanian Communist dictator Enver Hoxha. The slogans the Albanians displayed during the riots were: “We are Albanians and not Yugoslavs”, “We are the children of Skanderbeg and the army of Enver Hoxha”, “We Want a Unified Albania”, and “Kosovo-Republic”. This is what the Yugoslav media reported. In the US and Western media accounts, the Albanian majority was supposedly seeking greater rights and freedoms. The ultra-nationalist placards were dismissed and spin-doctored or “air brushed” out of the picture.

There was never any secret what the objective was. Beginning with the demonstrations in 1968, Kosovo Albanians wanted the right to secede from Yugoslavia. They wanted to create an ethnically pure “Kosovo”, an ethnic Albanian statelet.

Ethnically Motivated Murders

The series of ethnically motivated murders began with the murder of Danilo Milincic from the Kosovo village of Samodreza, near Vucitrn, on June 2, 1981. In 1941, when Adolf Hitler annexed Kosovo to Albania and created a Greater Albania, illegal settlers or “immigrants” came from Albania and forced the Milincic family out of Samodreza. In 1960, the father of Danilo, Slavoljub Milincic, was killed on his own property in Samodreza. He was killed by a gun shot. The murderer has never been apprehended. In 1982, his son, Danilo Milincic, was violently killed by an “immigrant” or settler from Albania, Ferat Mujo. Mujo killed Milincic in front of his own house. This was an ethnically motivated murder to drive out Christian Kosovo Serbs.

The second ethnically motivated murder was of Kosovo Serb Miodrag Saric on July 3, 1982 in the village of Mece near Djakovica, 40 miles southwest of Pristina. Saric was a 43-year-old Kosovo Serb, who was shot and killed by an Albanian neighbor, Ded Krasnici. The official Yugoslav press agency Tanjug reported on the murder. It was the second ethnically motivated murder of a Serb by an Albanian in Kosovo in 1982. The dispute reportedly began with a dispute over damage done to a field belonging to the Saric family. The Saric family had been threatened and coerced to leave Kosovo by Albanians. Saric was murdered because he would not leave his home in Kosovo. This was an ethnically motivated crime to drive out Kosovo Serbs and to create an ethnically pure “Kosova”.

On April 16, 1982, 21 Serbian priests and monks addressed an appeal to the Yugoslav government that focused on the human rights violations against Kosovo Serbs in Kosovo:

“It may be said without exaggeration that systematic genocide is gradually being perpetrated against the Serbian people in Kosovo! Because, if this were not the case, what do the theses about an 'ethnically clean Kosovo' mean which, regardless of everything, is being implemented without interruption? Or what do the words, often repeated in villages and hamlets, monasteries and churches and even in towns mean: 'What are you waiting for? Move away, this is ours!'"

A Broken Bottle Up His Anus

One of the most inflammatory and disturbing incidents against Kosovo Serbs occurred in 1985. Djorde Martinovic became a symbol of the human rights abuses committed against Kosovo Serbs. He became a “martyr” for Kosovo Serb Christians. In a painting by Miodrag Popovic, 1 Maj. 1985, Martinovic was shown being crucified like Jesus Christ by Albanian Muslim separatists. His case became symbolic of a perceived sense of Serbian Christian “martyrdom” in Kosovo. Wouldn’t you be outraged and angry if someone shoved a bottle up the ass of an American? In other words, this horrific attack came to symbolize Serbian grievances and a sense of victimization in Kosovo. For this reason, the story needed to be quashed. It had to be made to appear like it was all made up. Fearing a backlash, the Yugoslav Communist government and the US and the Western media colluded in manipulating and censoring and falsifying the incident. What followed was a massive cover-up by the Communist Yugoslav government.

On May 4, 1985, the Martinovic case appeared in the Yugoslav Communist political publication "Politika". The headline read: "A civilian employee of the JNA in Gnjilane, Djordje Martinović, attacked and injured on a stake on May 1 on his own land Jaruga, two kilometers from Gnjilane. This crime was committed by Albanian terrorists".

What happened in the Martinovic case? It all depends on who tells it. This is one version or “narrative” of the “storytelling”. Djordje Martinovic was ambushed by several Albanians who attacked him while he was working in the field on his own private property. He was placed on a stake or spike. He was then sodomized with a bottle, impaled with a bottle. The Albanian attackers forced the bottle in his anus. Martinovic managed to run to a nearby road where he was able to flag someone down. He was taken to the hospital in Pristina where he received emergency surgery. His injuries were serious.

This is where the plot thickens. He was then visited by Novak Ivanovic, an official from the civil branch of the Yugoslav Army, the JNA. Ivanovic then told him that he had not been sodomized by ethnic Albanian Muslims in an ethnically and religiously motivated hate crime. This is only what appeared to be the case on the surface. He told Martinovic that he was a homosexual and that he had inflicted the injury on himself. It was a self-inflicted injury. After a year passed, Novak Ivanovic gave an interview in the publication "Intervju" admitting that the whole homosexual explanation was concocted and fabricated on the orders of a General of the Yugoslav Army or JNA. The homosexual angle was a hoax. This is the part of the story that never seemed to reach the US and Western media. The US media stuck with the discredited homosexual angle because it could be true even though shown to be false.

Martinovic obtained the signatures of five doctors in Pristina that attested to the fact that such an injury could not be self-inflicted. He was operated on by British surgeon Peter Holly twice in London who also confirmed that a self-inflicted injury was not possible. A Slovenian doctor in Yugoslavia, in an effort to buttress the Communist regime, however, had argued that a self-inflicted injury was possible. This injury became politically charged. The Communist regime did not want to acknowledge that a Kosovo Serb, a Serbian Christian, was sodomized in an ethnically and religiously motivated hate crime. To do so would only strengthen Serbian “nationalists” within Yugoslavia. The Yugoslav Communist regime then falsified the evidence and the facts, indeed, made up its own “reality”. This was all done in the name of preserving Yugoslavia and in covering up any Serbian grievances.

Yugoslav interior minister Stane Dolanc, who was from Slovenia, made the “official” conclusions on Television Ljubljana in 1987: “The Djordje Martinovic case is over. My police have shown that the injury was self-inflicted and there is no legal recourse. Djordje is the first Serbian Samurai who has committed on himself hara-kiri." And that ended it. Martinovic had engaged in a homosexual act of self-gratification that went awry. He then blamed Albanian separatists for his own accident. Simultaneously, he wanted to exploit and manipulate his accident for propaganda purposes to demonize the Albanian Muslims and to paint Serbs as victims. This was how the Martinovic case was spin doctored by the Communist regime in Yugoslavia and the US and Western media.

In 1990, a court in Belgrade found the Yugoslav government liable and that Martinovic be awarded 100,000 Marks in damages. He never received that award. The court did, however, exonerate Martinovic. But no one noticed. Or cared.

Djordje Martinovic died on September 6, 2000 in Citluk near Krusevac. His wife was Jagodinka. He had three sons, Srecko, Dragan and Gradimir, and one daughter, Olga.

Rape as an Instrument of Terror

Albanian separatists in Kosovo used rape, sexual assault, against men and women in Kosovo. From 1982 to 1984 alone, 10 rapes against Kosovo Serb women committed by Albanian Muslim men were reported by the police in Kosovo. There were 11 attempted rapes against Kosovo Serb women by Albanian Muslims.

In 1983, Kosovo Serb farmer Stojan Peric was photographed carrying his 9 year-old daughter in his arms from a cornfield in Zitinje near Vitina, Kosovo where she was reportedly raped and sexually assaulted by Kosovo Muslim separatists. Do pictures speak a thousand words? Is seeing believing? The camera does not lie? Or does it? An image can mean many different things to different people. It is the viewer that imparts meaning to a photograph or an image. In other words, meaning can be suspended and deferred. I see what I want to see, or what the media or “experts” or US State Department hack tell me to see.

Was there a planned, systematic, and organized policy of rape as an instrument of terror in Kosovo? David Binder reported in The New York Times on November 1, 1987 that Fadil Hoxha, the political leader of Kosovo Albanians, had advocated that Kosovo Serb women be raped by Albanian Muslims. He was inciting rape against Christian women by Albanian Muslim men to create an ethnically pure Muslim “Kosova”. Can it get any more outrageous than that? How was this incitement of rape and genocide spun in the West? The spin doctors in the West concluded that Hoxha had “joked” at an official dinner in Prizren that Kosovo Serb women should be systematically raped. Can you “joke” about rape and genocide?

Who was Fadil Hoxha? He was one of the most prominent “Kosovar” Muslim political leaders in Kosovo during the Communist period. He had served as the president of the Assembly of the Kosovo Autonomous Province for two terms, first from July 11, 1945 to February 29, 1953, then a second term from June 24, 1967 to May 7, 1969. In 1967 he was appointed to the Yugoslav Communist Party Presidium. In 1974 he became a member of the Federal Presidency of Yugoslavia. During 1978-79 he held the rotating position of president of the Federal Presidency. He was regarded as a “father-figure” for the Albanian Muslim separatists and secessionists. How do you explain the incitement to rape and genocide by a top Albanian Muslim leader in Kosovo?

Desecration of Christian Graves and Cemeteries

One of the most horrific human rights abuses against Kosovo Serb Christians was never even covered by the US or Western media. This was a crime committed by Albanian Muslim separatists against Kosovo Serbs.

On September 27, 1988, five Albanian Muslim “Kosovars” dug up the bodies of two Kosovo Serb infants, Radojko and Dragica Petrovic. They were twins who had died at birth. The Albanian Muslims then scattered the remains of the bodies all over the grave in the Orthodox Christian cemetery in Grace near Vucitrn. This attack occurred on an Orthodox Christian holy day, the Day of the Glorification of the Holy Cross. This was a horrific ethnically and religiously motivated hate crime committed by Albanian Muslims against Serbian Christians. This crime was well-documented and substantiated by the police. Needless to say, it was virtually censored in the US and Western media. How do you spin or manipulate such horrendous human rights abuses? When you cannot manipulate or spin the facts, you ignore or dismiss the incident entirely, in toto. That was what the US and Western media did in this instance.

Albanians systematically destroyed and desecrated Orthodox Christian cemeteries from 1981 to 1989. Gravestones and monuments of Orthodox Serbs in the Srbica cemetery were attacked in the summer of 1985. On July 18, 1984, Serbian gravestones in Slakovce, near Samodreza, were destroyed, desecrated, and vandalized. On October 8, 1985, in Begov Lukavac, the Serbian Orthodox cemetery was burned. There was photographic evidence of these ethnically and religiously motivated human rights violations and hate crimes. Nevertheless, in the US and the West, these human rights violations were censored, dismissed, and spun away as “claims” and “assertions”. None of the human rights groups in the US or the West paid any attention. The “international community” turned a blind eye.

Conclusion

From 1981 to 1989, an estimated 20,000 Kosovo Serbs were driven out from Kosovo. Many were settled in refugee camps in Belgrade. Kaludjerica, near Belgrade, was a town settled by Serbian refugees from Kosovo in the 1980s. Kosovo Serbs were murdered, raped, beaten, attacked, and terrorized to leave their homes and property in Kosovo. Serbian churches, gravestones, cemeteries, and religious and cultural and historical monuments were vandalized, desecrated, and destroyed. Serbian priests and nuns were attacked, beaten, and abused. Why was this systematic, planned, and organized campaign of genocide against the Serbian Orthodox Christian population of Kosovo suppressed and censored in the US and the West?




The article above is a shortened version of a longer one on Kosovo in the 1980s that will appear on Serbianna web site. In the longer version, Carl Savich details how the US/Western media manipulated the events of the 1980s in Serbian Kosovo province.

Carl Savich, Historian and Balkan Expert

Carl Savich is a Michigan-based historian, with a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. He has an M.A. in History and a J.D. in Law. He is a member of the Alpha Zeta Upsilon chapter of the international history honor society, Phi Alpha Theta. He has received an LCP BW American Jurisprudence Award and a Handy and Harmon Academic Scholarship.

Carl Savich’s work has been cited on the US Holocaust Memorial Museum website in Washington, DC and the Holocaust and Genocide Studies website of the University of Minnesota. His articles have appeared on numerable web sites, including AntiWar.com, Balkanlysis.com, Kosovo.net, MakNews.com, RealityMacedonia.com, SND.com, SUC.com, Pogledi.com, and Rastko.com.

Mr. Savich has been a contributor to The Detroit News, The Detroit Free Press, Foreign Policy, Ancient Serbia (Stara Srbija), The Voice of Ravanica, Liberty (Sloboda), The American Srbobran, The Macomb Daily, The Sterling Heights Mirror, and The Oakland Post. His areas of interest and expertise are history, journalism, political science, and law.

Nora Beloff on Forgotten Kosovo

Kosovo Serb mother
Carrying a riffle when going to farm their land was the only way for Serbs to venture outside in Kosovo-Metohija during the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s... Serbian mother with her children in Kosovo province, 1980s.

Nora Beloff on Forgotten Kosovo, the Not-So-Distant Past

Following is an excerpt (pp210-214) from Nora Beloff’s book “Tito’s Flawed Legacy: Yugoslavia & the West Since 1939,” published by the Westview Press in Boulder CO, 1985, about the Kosovo province’s not-so-distant past, during the rule and after the death of Yugoslavia’s communist leader Marshall Tito, an ethnic Croat.

Tito died May 4, 1980. Beloff first visited Kosovo in 1979.

Tito’s Flawed Legacy, Chapter 6: Neither Brotherhood nor Unity

After 1968, Kosovo obtained the lion’s share of the federal development funds which became its principal source of investment. [...]

The Pristina college, which had previously been a branch of the University of Belgrade, acquired its own independent status after the 1968 disturbances and, before books were available, it proceeded to build itself a grandiose gold-domed library. At its peak in 1980, it enrolled 45,000 students, so becoming one of the largest in Europe. [...] After 1968 the Albanian language replaced Serb as the first in teaching, and a large number of professors and textbooks were brought in from Tirana [capital of neighboring Albania], storing up trouble for the future. (A. Pipa and S. Repishli, Studies on Kosovo, East European Monographs, New York 1984.)

Within a Decade 100,000 Serbs Ethnically Cleansed from Kosovo

The suddenly demoted Serb minority was seriously threatened by Tito’s transfer to [Albanian, Mahmud] Bakali of the police and the administration. Though a rigorous censorship was enforced to keep the facts from the rest of Yugoslavia, within a decade over 100,000 Serbs were induced or harassed into leaving and the police stood idly by while Serb homes were destroyed and cemeteries desecrated. Visiting Kosovo, Tito warned against nationalists and irredentists: “All these foes have the same aim: to try and provoke dissatisfaction among the Albanians in Kosovo and to sow discord among the multiracial population.”

Large Scale Violence Erupts After Tito’s Death

And indeed, soon after he died, violence erupted again and on a much larger scale. What started as a university demonstration against canteen food developed quickly into a politically inspired insurrection. Army units recruited from all parts of the Federation were rushed in, and after a show of force and several weeks of curfew, order was at least superficially restored. Belgrade reported nine fatal casualties and Tirana reported 1,000. As outside observers were excluded and as neither capital respects “bourgeois” objectivity, the true number remains unknown.

The situation was still explosive when I visited Pristina for the second time in the summer of 1983. Bakali had been ousted from his job but remained free to roam around the city and was warmly applauded wherever he appeared. [...]

Kosovo Albanians Boast About Efforts to Create “Pure Albania”

The censorship was lifted after the 1981 riots and reports began being published about Albanian efforts to eliminate the Serbs in order to create “a pure Albania.” In one almost “pure” Albanian village, the head of the last remaining Serb family had been murdered and his widow and children threatened. A delegation of Serbs called on the President of Serbia, Gen. Ljubisic (formerly Tito’s Defense Minister, later the Serb member of the collective presidency) to seek protection and compensation for the bereaved family. They were told he could not intervene as this was an internal Kosovo affair.

Part of Pec Monastery, the seat of the Serb Patriarch, was burnt down by Albanian terrorists. A local priest told me of the Church’s gratitude to the Communist authorities for financing the reconstruction, but at the same time nuns were informing my Serb driver that village boys threw stones at them and poisoned their cattle. The arsonists were never caught. [...]

Annexation of Territories to Create Greater Albania

But on Kosovo’s demand for its own republic Tito was adamant, and after hearing of continued troubles despite the economic largesses, he paid a visit to Pristina in 1979, to denounce nationalist irredentists. [...]

The Kosovo irredentists are claiming not only republic status for their province but also the annexation of many neighbouring localities where the Albanians are now in a majority and which include Tetovo, Macedonia’s second biggest city.




So much for Kosovo Albanians being “oppressed for decades” by the Vile Serbs who, according to the Western mainstream media, have created “an apartheid” in their southern province, aimed at destroying ethnic Albanians in every way conceivable.

Nora Beloff, Formidable Expert on Eastern Europe and Former Yugoslavia

Nora Beloff (1919–1997), the first woman appointed the Chief Political Correspondent way back in 1964, was a British reporter and author with formidable knowledge about Eastern Europe in general and former Yugoslavia in particular. She joined Reuters in 1945, after working for the French Section of the British Political Intelligence Department. In 1947, she became the Paris Correspondent of The Observer. During the 1950s she served as the newspaper’s political correspondent in Moscow and Washington. She left Observer in 1976 to become and independent reporter, writing mainly on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe.

Nora Beloff’s books include: The General Says No (1963), an account of Britain’s first abortive attempt to join the Common Market; Transit of Britain (1973), a discussion of Britain’s changing role in the postwar world; Freedom Under Foot (1976), her protest against the enforcement of trade union membership for journalists proposed by Michael Foot; No Travel Like Russian Travel [published in the U.S. under the title Inside the Soviet Empire: Myth and Reality] (1979), describing her journey by car across the Soviet Union which ended by her being arrested; Tito’s Flawed Legacy (1985), laying out the post-WWII realities in Tito’s Yugoslavia, built largely at the expense of Serbs, upon the maxim “weaker Serbia, stronger Yugoslavia,” and her last, unfinished book about the forceful break-up of former Yugoslavia, titled Yugoslavia, an Avoidable War (1997).

A three hour documentary based on Nora Beloff’s last book is well worth the time for anyone who wishes to get an objective insight into what really went on in and around former Yugoslavia during the 1990s (Yugoslavia, an Avoidable War documentary, Part 1, Part 2).

July 25, 2007

America’s PSYWAR Against Serbia in Full Swing

Mainstream media

Unrelenting PSYWAR

After we have been subjected to almost two full decades of Western mainstream media lies, distortions, half-truths, wishful thinking, brainwashing and subliminal mind-bending messages within the brutal PSYWAR aimed at destroying the Serbian nation, chipping Serbian resolve and embedding the resistance-is-futile meme in the minds of their public world-around, the same old suspects have now found a new venue to keep at it some more.

Kosovo Independence Is Imminent!

For the past 14 months Western press was tirelessly “informing” us Kosovo independence is imminent — right around the corner, that it is “a matter of weeks rather than months” and “days rather than weeks,” gloating over the secret deals supposedly being made with Russia “behind the closed doors” as-we-speak, quoting scores of “diplomats who wished to remain anonymous” who kept confirming that treacherous Moscow doesn’t give a rat’s ass over Serbia, it’s just a matter of few more days of cajoling, more “creative persuasion” (wink-wink), few more carrots for the “corrupt Kremlin regime,” another promise-we-won’t-keep for our Belgrade underlings and it will all be done just as we said, “Kosovo, the last piece of the Yugoslav puzzle,” will be hijacked for good.

More Humble Pie, Anyone?

One would think those big chunks of a humble pie served to Western bureaucrats over Kosovo on a weekly basis, ending with the pie in the face Friday, when they were forced to step onto a world stage in tears over their defeat, to finally admit they are utterly helpless and unable to deliver on constantly reiterated promises to sever Kosovo province from Serbia (the famously choked up We Regret speech) — one would think that all that would be sufficient for the Western press to learn the lesson and start sticking to the facts, stay in the presence, stop projecting, stop distorting, stop trying to wish it into being, get real for once... but no, that’s not going to happen any time soon — as long as media in the West remains just a loudspeaker for the government policies and an instrument of the ruling elite’s hold on power.

VOA, the Pillar of American Propaganda Since WWII

Right now they are busy manipulating the facts surrounding the Contact Group assigned with the task of organizing new negotiations between the Serbs and Kosovo Albanian terrorists. Voice of America offers the prime example of the latest twist and currently most popular spin:

“The United States and European Union took the Kosovo issue away from the United Nations Security Council and handed it over to the six-nation Contact Group last week. Russia has threatened to veto any resolution that is not acceptable to both Belgrade and Pristina. Contact Group members - the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Russia - do not have veto power,” says VOA, the Pillar of American Propaganda since the WWII.

Borrowing from Goebbels’ Bag of Tricks

In few short sentences, the author of this brilliant sampling of Goebbels’ tricks, assures the world the U.S. and the EU are precisely where they belong — on top of things, and still firmly in the driving seat, controlling the trajectory of stars, the expansion of sunspots, the diffusion of intergalactic dust and, of course, the “Kosovo issue.”

So, you see, it’s not that they gave in or, God forbid!, caved in when they consented that the new negotiations are the only way forward, no, no, no! They, in fact, took the Kosovo issue away from those who thought they could mess up their plans, i.e. Russia. And in “taking it away,” the Rulers of the Known Universe were as clever as ever so they made sure to “hand it over” (?!) to Their Own Group where Russia is desperately isolated, being that in this, U.S./EU-owned Group, Russia is stripped of its veto power.

In other words, according to VOA, the “Kosovo issue” is once again as good as settled because, obviously, Russia’s one measly vote is nothing in comparison to five (5) U.S./EU votes, and that’s that, right? Wrong.

Contact and My Yoga Group Can’t Grant Independence to Anything

That such suggestions could only be pulled out of the propagandist of the day’s ass and have no connection to the reality has been confirmed by a number of the officials, in case one really has no clue as to how things actually work with UN resolutions, international law and the rest of it.

Only yesterday Russian President Putin joined the scores of officials to underline the basic fact, that UN Resolution 1244 which reaffirms Serbia’s sovereignty over Kosovo province, like it or not, is still the main document “Kosovo issue” stands upon and falls back to. Foreign Minister Lavrov further explained that any UN resolution, including this one, can be annulled only by the new UN resolution approved by the UN Security Council, and not by any other body, even if international by its composition, like the Contact Group or my Yoga Group.

This in addition to the glaringly obvious, that Contact Group works solely under the auspices of United Nations, not under the auspices of United States or EU. In this case, the so-called Contact Group for Serbian province is the less bulky, smaller version of the United Nations’ “informal talk shop” as James Jatras aptly called it the other day, but certainly not the group which could overrule the UN Security Council, annul legally binding UN SC resolutions, or adopt the new ones. To suggest such a possibility is plain idiotic.

Contact Group Works on Basis of Consensus

In order to further clarify things (for the political imbeciles dominating Western mainstream media), Tanjug reports that “Russia rejected Tuesday claims that the transfer of the Kosovo process from the UN Security Council to the Contact Group, in which the right to veto does not exist, would make it lose the lever of influence in resolving this issue, and noted that all decisions in the Contact Group are taken by consensus.”

This means that the views of its member-states must be taken into account, Russian Foreign Ministry said.

Referring to the Contact Group meeting scheduled for Wednesday in Vienna, ministry spokesman Mikhail Kaminin said that the Kosovo status issue remains the responsibility of the UN Security Council only, and that UN SC cannot be replaced by any other international structure.

The UN SC Resolution 1244, the sole legitimate basis for the negotiating process, also remain in effect and it cannot be abrogated or amended by anyone but the UN Security Council, he said in a release.

The Contact Group role is to help in direct negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina without imposing their final outcome, he said.

The drafting of mutually acceptable agreements is up to the parties themselves, Kaminin stressed.

July 24, 2007

Serbia’s Resolution on Kosovo Adopted

Serbian Parliament in session
Serbian Parliament adopts the Government’s Kosovo resolution with overwhelming majority. July 24, 2007.

Serbian Parliament Adopts Government’s Kosovo Resolution

Serbian National Assembly overwhelmingly voted for the adoption of the Resolution on the need for a just solution of the issue of the Autonomous Province of Kosovo-Metohija based on international law late Tuesday evening at the special session of the Serbian Parliament.

The Resolution laying a groundwork for the national and state policy on the issue of Kosovo-Metohija province was voted in by the 217 MPs representing all major Serbian political parties—Radicals (SRS), Democratic Party (DS), Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS), Socialist Party (SPS), G17 Plus, and including members of the Roma and minority parties.

Twelve parliament members voted against the resolution, led by Ryza Halimi, an Albanian representative of the Presevo Albanian minority, and Cedomir Jovanovic and Nenad Canak, both George Soros’ representatives infiltrated in the Serbian Parliament. Three MPs representing Hungarian minority in Serbia abstained from the vote.

Serbian Kosovo-Metohija Resolution: Kosovo Inseparable Part of Serbia

1. Kosovo and Metohija is an inseparable part of the state of Serbia on the basis of existing and all-binding constitutional and international legal documents. The sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Serbia are guaranteed not only by the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, but also by the United Nations Charter, the Helsinki Final Act and proper resolutions of the UN Security Council, especially Resolution 1244. Any solution for the future status of Kosovo-Metohija must be based on these basic principles, complying at the same time with the appropriate decisions of the UN Security Council. Any attempt to reach a decision that violates these basic principles would be declared null and void and dangerous for the survival of the state of Serbia, and as such, would represent a motive for the state organs of the Republic of Serbia to take appropriate actions in line with international law.

Proposing Autonomy to the Southern Province

2. The Republic of Serbia is ready to start a new phase of negotiations for finding the most favourable solution for Kosovo-Metohija, taking into account all fundamental state interests, the legitimate interests of the Albanian national minority in the province, general interests of securing regional stability and prospects for peaceful and prosperous future for all its citizens. Laying out its proposal for substantial autonomy of Kosovo-Metohija, the Republic of Serbia is ready to reach a compromise solution to this issue.

Requesting Open-Ended True Negotiations (As Opposed to Those Ahtisaari Rigged)

3. To that end, it is necessary that interested international parties, together with representatives of the Republic of Serbia, secure true negotiations between representatives of the Republic of Serbia and interim institutions of self-government in Kosovo-Metohija. As opposed to unsuccessful talks led by Martti Ahtisaari, new negotiations must be open as regards their outcome and duration, while at the same time respecting the basic principles and norms of international law.

New Talks Within the Bounds of Res.1244

4. Serbian parliament thinks that the new United Nations Security Council resolution on Kosovo-Metohija should be brought only after the conclusion of talks at which a compromise solution for the province’s status resolution is adopted. New talks may be led only within the effective UN Security Council Resolution 1244 and on the basis of the United Nation’s clear mandate.

Serbia’s Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity Non-Negotiable

5. Serbian parliament demands that all United Nations member states respect Serbia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in line with international law, UN Charter and UN Security Council Resolution 1244. Serbian parliament also demands that UN Secretary General takes all measures at his disposal, on the basis of UN binding documents, and prevent the breach of the UN Charter and UN Security Council Resolution 1244. The Serbian government is under obligation to act towards the accomplishment of these demands posed by Serbian parliament.

Unilateral Recognitions Will be Followed by the Strong Response

6. Serbian parliament thinks that unilateral recognition of Kosovo’s self-proclaimed independence would have unpredictable consequences on regional stability. The Serbian government and all state organs are under obligation to react vigorously and duly to any hint or act on the part of any international entity whose final aim would be unilateral acts of breaching Serbia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. This particularly refers to threats and acts of unilateral acknowledgment of Kosovo-Metohija’s independence.

New Negotiating Team and Regularly Informed Parliament

7. The Serbian government is under obligation to form a new state negotiating team for talks on Kosovo-Metohija’s future status.

8. The Serbian government is under obligation to regularly inform Serbian parliament on international and domestic situation regarding Kosovo-Metohija.

Serbia, Russia Determined to Persevere

Crosses on Serbian church

Serbian Parliament to Adopt National Resolution for Preservation of Kosovo Province

A special session of the Serbian Parliament was opened at 4 pm on Tuesday, where the deputies debate on Serbian draft resolution on Kosovo-Metohija and the report issued by the state negotiating team regarding the negotiations on Kosovo province.

The session is attended by Serbian President Boris Tadic and Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica, as well as by most of the members of the Serbian government.

The Serbian government adopted on Monday the draft resolution and the report of the negotiating team, and submitted the documents to the parliament for consideration. The draft resolution points to the fact that Kosovo and Metohija is an “inseparable part of the state of Serbia, all on the basis of the valid and obliging constitutional and international legal documents.”

The document also points to Serbia’s willingness to begin a new stage of negotiations so that the most favourable solution be found for Kosovo-Metohija, bearing in mind the country’s basic state interest and the legitimate interests of the ethnic Albanian minority in the province.

The report on the negotiations that were held in Vinenna till March this year and the draft resolution will be presented to the MPs by Minister for Kosovo and Metohija Slobodan Samardzic.

Kostunica: UN SC Resolution 1244 the Exclusive Guide for New Negotiations

Addressing Serbian National Assembly Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica said that new negotiations on the future organization of Kosovo-Metohija province can exclusively be led under the mandate of the Security Council, as well as that the only possible basis for the talks was UN SC Resolution 1244.

“There are three crucial elements of this Resolution — first, that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Serbia are explicitly confirmed, second that the solution lies in basic autonomy for the province, and third, which is of particular importance, that the Resolution does not mention Kosovo-Metohija’s independence anywhere,” Kostunica reminded Serbian parliament.

He said that the recent withdrawal of the American-EU resolution from the Security Council represented a significant victory for Serbia, which concluded the first stage in defending Kosovo-Metohija.

Serbia expects the Contact Group to be active, but also that the entire negotiation process be under the UN Security Council mandate, Kostunica said, adding that in that process, the issue should be defined in detail.

“Our Generation Cannot and Shall Not Give Kosovo Away”

“And this means that there is no such thing as Kosovo-Metohija issue, since what we are speaking of is an integral and inseparable part of Serbia’s territory. What we have here is something else — an open issue of the ethnic Albanian minority in the province, and it is essential that, by way of constructive dialogue, a right solution be found to this issue,” the Prime Minister said.

According to him, it is time for true negotiations, and if there is good will, it is really possible to reach such a solution that will meet the basic interests of both the ethnic Albanian minority and the state of Serbia.

“Today, Serbia confirms in its National Assembly that Kosovo and Metohija is embedded into the deepest foundations of the Serbian state and that Kosovo is a synonym of our national being, culture, religion, of our history and our future,” the Serbian Premier said.

“Our generation cannot and shall not give Kosovo, and if we do not give it, we can be certain that Kosovo-Metohija will remain in Serbia forever,” Kostunica concluded, calling upon the deputies to back the proposed resolution which provides guidelines for Serbia’s future policy in the process of resolving the future organization of the southern Serbian province.

Putin: Resolution 1244 the Only Framework for Negotiations

Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday that the work on defining Kosovo-Metohija’s status had been transferred onto the Contact Group, but that UN Security Council Resolution 1244 continued to be valid.

The work has been transferred onto the Contact Group, but Resolution 1244 is valid, Putin said in consultations with his ministers.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov added that the Resolution continued to be valid as a whole and that a decision by the UN Security Council was required for its annulment.

Lavrov also said that the Kosovo issue would be resolved in the Contact Group, and not on the basis of the plan issued by Martti Ahtisaari, but rather with the respect of the positions of Belgrade and Pristina, Itar-Tass reported.

“We consider that the foundation of negotiations cannot be based on the Ahtisaari plan as it did not get U.N. Security Council support,” Interfax news agency quoted Lavrov.

Russian Foreign Ministry: No Time Limitations, Talks Based on Res.1244

Acting in keeping with Resolution 1244, the Contact Group should continue the efforts aimed at providing conditions for a dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina and for bringing the positions in the negotiation process on Kosovo-Metohija’s future closer to each other, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin told Tanjug on Tuesday.

Assuming that the Contact Group should continue efforts in providing conditions for a dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina and bringing the positions in the Kosovo negotiation process closer to each other, we are convinced that the Contact Group should act in keeping the UN Security Council Resolution 1244 which has preserved its legal authority, Kamynin said.

Commenting on the withdrawal of the American-EU draft resolution from voting at the UN Security Council, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Saturday that no time limits should be imposed on the new rounds of negotiations and that all required bases, UN Security Council Resolution 1244 for one, had been provided for the talks.

Miscalculating Serbia and Russia

Vladimir Putin

Consistently Underestimating Russia and Misjudging Serbia

Miscalculating Kosovo, by Simon Tisdall, The Guardian

The west has consistently underestimated Russian resolve on Serbia’s rights in Kosovo, and it looks like Vladimir Putin could raise the stakes again.

Exactly how far Russia will go in defence of Serbia's rights in Kosovo is a question of pressing importance, now UN security council negotiations to grant consensual, conditional independence to the breakaway province have ground to an ignominious halt.

Western countries including Britain and France - prime movers in the 1999 Nato intervention - have consistently underestimated Russian resolve on this issue. By tabling a UN resolution, they tried to call Moscow's bluff. But President Vladimir Putin icily stared them down. On Friday, they blinked first.

On the Verge of Third World War

Previous miscalculations over Kosovo nearly caused a physical collision in June 1999, when Russian paratroopers made an overland dash to occupy Pristina airport, thereby pre-empting Nato's peacekeepers. General Wesley Clark, Nato supreme commander, ordered 500 British and French troops to bar their way.

A clash was narrowly avoided, in part because the British General Sir Mike Jackson, Kosovo force commander, reportedly told Gen Clark: "I'm not going to start the third world war for you."

The Russians were not wholly in the wrong. They had played a decisive role in cajoling the then Yugoslav president, Slobodan Milosevic, to withdraw his troops. In return they expected to police their own sector, most likely the ethnic Serb minority-dominated areas of northern Kosovo. When that was denied them, they felt cheated - and reacted accordingly.

A Russian commander, General Leonid Ivashov, later told the BBC that thousands of crack troops, including several battalions of paratroopers, were on two-hour standby at Russian airbases, poised to fly in if the confrontation with Nato escalated.

Moscow's Range of Options

Looking at the latest chapter of the Kosovo saga, it seems obvious that Mr Putin, emboldened by Russia's economic and political resurgence, was always unlikely to take a softer line than his weak, discredited predecessor, Boris Yeltsin. If anything, he could raise the stakes yet further.

If really pushed, Moscow has a range of options. It could strengthen traditional political and military cooperation with Serbia's new government and support for Kosovo's Serb minority. It may finalise its withdrawal from the 1990 conventional forces in Europe treaty, potentially raising tensions across eastern Europe and the Balkans.

The Kosovo stand-off is already being conflated with the row over proposed US missile defence installations in Poland and the Czech Republic. Retaliatory Russian missile deployments and retargeting along its western flank and in the Kaliningrad enclave are another possible part of a more broadly disquieting flux.

Misjudging Serbia: Kosovo Much More Important Than EU

Sharpening disagreement may also encourage Serb nationalist and irredentist forces, barely beaten back at the last general election, and deepen Belgrade's EU ambivalence. In theory, Serbia hopes to sign a stabilisation and association agreement with Brussels in October - a first step to full membership.

But Vojislav Kostunica, Serbia's prime minister, warned that the EU was not everything. "The offer is like this: if you want Europe, you can forget Kosovo. If you want Kosovo, you can forget Europe. Things cannot be like that. It's indecent," he said last week.

"The grabbing of 15% of Serbia's territory and the formation of another Albanian state in the Balkans would represent legal violence and would have serious consequences," a joint Russia-Serbian statement said. The 1999 UN resolution recognising Kosovo as part of Serbia should be upheld.

Nor would Belgrade countenance attempts to cut a deal via the six-country Kosovo Contact Group, said Serbia's president, Boris Tadic. Only the security council could decide status issues. In an echo of Iraq, Russia's foreign ministry said: "Attempts to bypass the UN will contradict all international agreements on Kosovo, destabilise the Balkans and encourage separatists the world over."

U.S. & Co. Have Grown Both Deaf and Dumb

Serbia says it simply wants talks without preconditions or assumptions. Yet far from seeking to calm matters in the wake of their UN debacle, it is as though the US and its partners have grown deaf as well as dumb. Echoing President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, insists: "We are committed to an independent Kosovo and we will get there one way or another".

Suggestions that Washington may ultimately override objections and unilaterally recognise Kosovan statehood have encouraged the province's ethnic Albanian majority leaders to toy with a declaration of independence in November - and fuelled grassroots tensions on both sides.

Recklessness Leading to Future Grave Miscalculations

Amid rising concern that the Bush administration, with west European connivance, is acting irresponsibly, even recklessly, Ms Rice will follow a meeting with Kosovan leaders today with talks with Serbia's foreign minister in Washington later this week. The Contact Group, which includes Russia, is also due to meet in Berlin tomorrow (weds).

But all this is so much whistling in the dark. The fundamental disagreement on Kosovo's future, dating back to the summer of 1999, remains entrenched. And history suggests there may be more grave miscalculations to come.

July 23, 2007

Kosovo Reality Check: It’s Over, Mr. Fried

Beaten

Kosovo: Back to Square One

By Srdja Trifkovic, Chronicles Magazine

The United States government and its West European partners have given up on calling a U.N. Security Council vote on their joint resolution supporting Kosovo’s independence. They will initiate direct talks between Belgrade and Pristina instead, as Serbia and Russia have demanded all along. U.S. Ambassador at the UN Zalmay Khalilzad said there would be four months of negotiations between the parties under the auspices of the Contact Group. “We hope that during the course of those negotiations, the parties will come to an agreement,” Khalilzad said; but no one is saying what would happen if no agreement is reached after those 120 days.

In other words, we are back at Square One on Kosovo—exactly where we had been at the end of 2005, before Marti Ahtisaari started his ill-fated mission to gerrymander an independent “Kosova.”

Amusing and Instructive Exercise

It would be amusing and instructive to compile a collection of quotes made since that time by assorted politicians, pundits, bureucrats, academics and legislators to the effect that Kosovo’s independence is inevitable and imminent. Amusing, because so many luminaries—Tom Lantos, Joseph Lieberman, Nicholas Burns, Daniel Serwer and Richard Holbrooke, among others—were so obviously wrong; and instructive because their single-minded push for Kosovo’s independence is turning into yet another foreign policy disaster for the United States.

Fried’s ‘Totalen Krieg’ Speech to Serbs

But old habits die hard. Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Daniel Fried went to Belgrade last month to tell the Serbs that the game was up:

Kosovo will be independent. That is not simply an opinion; it is also a statement of where we think the result will be. Serbia’s leaders need to get beyond denial. They need to stop telling the Serbian people that it will not happen. They need to tell the Serbian people the truth which is that Milosevic lost Kosovo when he went to war with NATO and committed atrocities against the Kosovars. I will tell the truth if the Serbian leaders cannot, and that truth is that Serbia will not rule in Kosovo any more than Hungary will rule in the Vojvodina. It’s gone. It’s over.

Fried’s shrill tone, bordering on hysteria, reflected weakness, rather than strength; it brought to mind Goebbels’s famous Totalen Krieg speech in the aftermath of Stalingrad. In a similar vein, at the end of June President George W. Bush was in Tirana, telling his enthusiastic hosts that America has made up her mind on this issue (“our support is solid, firm”); and only last week Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice said, “We are committed to an independent Kosovo and we will get there one way or another.”

It’s Over, Mr. Fried

The time has come to shake Bush, Fried, Rice et al from their pseudo-reality and explain to them what they dare not tell themselves: “we” will not get there this year, or next, or any other, any more than “we” did in 2006. In other words, it is time to tell them that Kosovo will NOT be independent. That is not simply an opinion; it is also a statement of diplomatic and political reality. America’s leaders need to get beyond denial. They need to stop telling themselves and the world that it will happen. They need to tell the American people the truth which is that Bush lost his Kosovo gambit when he turned it into a test of Russian resolve, after all the atrocities his predecessor committed against the Serbs. Chronicles will tell the truth if the U.S. Administration leaders cannot, and that truth is that their proteges will not rule in Kosovo any more than America will rule in Vietnam. It’s gone, Mr. Fried, it’s over.

It is by now evident that independence will not be steamrolled through the Security Council, and no feasible scenario to bypass the UN is on the horizon. The time has come for some real negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina—with no time limits and no preordained outcomes.

Russia Rising

What the advocates of Kosovo’s independence fail to grasp is that for the first time in two decades a great power is able, willing, and even determined to support and meaningfully defend a Serbian position in the mosaic of post-Yugoslav disputes. That power is Russia, and Putin’s motivation is not Orthodox or Slavic solidarity. It has little to do with Kosovo per se, or Serbia as such, and a lot to do with Russia’s return to the world stage as a self-confident great power that has had enough of American faits accomplis and dictates typical of the Yeltsin era.

U.S. Consistent in Screwing the Serbs Up

Throughout those two decades the United States’ position has been admirably consistent. As Doug Bandow points out, successive administrations’ policy amounted to the question “What the Serbs want?” and, upon hearing the reply, a firm and unrelenting decision that they cannot have it and never will have it.

Franjo Tudjman’s ethnic cleansing of hunderds of thousands of Serbs from the Krajina was thus aided and abetted by the U.S. on the grounds that Croatia had the right to protect her sovereignty and territorial integrity against Serbian separatism. Islamic fundamentalist Alija Izetbegovic was supported on the absurd pretext that he wanted to build a multi-ethnic, multi-confessional, liberal-democratic Bosnia-Herzegovina. Albanian terrorists, war criminals and church-burning, dope-smuggling pimps were supported in Kosovo on the grounds that they had the right to self-determination.

[...]

Putin’s Options Increasing

Far from being deterred by Mr. Bush’s apparent commitment to Kosovo’s independence, Russian President Vladimir Putin sees it as a God-sent chance to embarrass Mr. Bush and show the world that Russia can no longer be treated with the mix of disdainful arrogance and the way it was treated under Yeltsin. With the Administration’s options diminishing, Putin’s are increasing.

On the diplomatic front, Russia can and will veto any resolution presented to the Security Council that is based on Ahtisaari’s moribund plan and that assumes independence as the final outcome. Resolution 1244 cannot be legally bypassed, and it is unequivocal about Serbia’s sovereignty. If the European Union (under American pressure) tries to bypass the UN, however, Putin can retaliate by playing his energy card. According to a respected Russian analyst,

The Russians would cut supplies if provoked. Kosovo really is that big an issue to them. If they gave in on this, all of Putin’s efforts to re-establish Russia as a great power would be undermined. Putin wants to remind Germany in particular—but also other former Soviet satellites—that thwarting Russia carries a price. If the European Union were to unilaterally act against Russian wishes, Putin would have to choose between appearing as if he is all talk and no action, and acting. Putin would choose the latter.

According to the same source, Putin also has a military option. Contrary to popular belief, the Russians retain increasingly effective military units. The Russian military retains an excellent core, particularly in its airborne regiments. The Russians could fly a regiment of troops to Belgrade, use Serbian trucks to move to the administrative line dividing Kosovo from the rest of Serbia, and threaten to move into Kosovo to take their place in KFOR.

Testing Russia Over Kosovo Might Prove Disastrous

The Europeans would protest, but they would not react. Western Europe is heavily dependent on Russian natural gas, and it cannot afford to follow Washington into an open-ended confrontation over a peripheral issue. Signals from Moscow indicate that challenging Kosovo’s independence militarily would prompt Russia to call NATO defense capabilities into question, which could leave the Europeans even more fractured. “Do not assume that the Russians would not dare try such a move,” the Russian source insists: “The Russians are itching for an opportunity to confront the West—and win. In the case of Kosovo, should they choose to make an issue of it, they have the diplomatic, economic and military options to force the West to back down. Condoleezza Rice has said that Kosovo will never be returned to Serbian rule. Putin would love to demonstrate that it doesn’t matter what the U.S. secretary of state wants.”

In short, Kosovo is an asymmetric issue. Mr. Bush cares about it only as it relates to U.S. “credibility.” Accepting the assurances of inherited Clintonite bureaucrats of Mr. Burns’s ilk that the Serbs would cave in and that the Russians would budge may well prove to have been the second greatest blunder of his presidency.

If push comes to shove, Mr. Bush will face Moscow all alone. There is a great deal of dissent in Europe, from Madrid to Athens to Bucharest and Bratislava, but not even those Europeans who are nominally pro-independence—notably Germans—would not sacrifice a single day’s supply of natural gas over Albanian claims. By contrast, for Serbia this is an existential issue and for Russia it is a litmus test of her ability to be once again a great power, and to be seen and respected as one, after the dreadful Yeltsin interlude.

A New U.S. Paradigm Urgently Needed

It is not prudent for the United States to insist that Kosovo should and will become independent—as President George W. Bush did in Tirana last June, followed by Dr. Rice and her aides on an almost daily basis—even as it is obvious that Russia will veto any attempt to achieve that goal through the United Nations’ Security Council, and even as the European Union is increasingly reluctant to participate in any scheme to bypass the UN. Statements by American officials that Kosovo’s independence is “inevitable” are a classic case of irresponsible policy-makers painting themselves into a corner on a peripheral issue, and then claiming that the issue had morphed into a test of American resolve.

A responsible leadership in Washington would never allow Kosovo to become such a test for three reasons.

  1. Quite apart from historic, cultural, moral and legal aspects, the issue of who controls the southern Serbian province is perfectly irrelevant to American interests. It is a small, land-locked piece of real estate, of dubious “objective” value, away from all major Balkan transit corridors, and not nearly as rich in natural resources as both Serbs and Albanians like to imagine. If Kosovo were to disappear tomorrow, no ordinary American would be able to tell the difference.
  2. The change of Kosovo’s status against the will of Belgrade, in addition to being a clear violation of the Law of Nations, would set a precedent potentially detrimental to U.S. interests. To enable an ethnic minority to secede from an internationally recognized state on the grounds of that minority’s numerical preponderance in a given locale would open Pandora’s box of claims all over the world, not least among Russian speakers in the Crimea, parts of Estonia and Latvia, northern Kazakhstan, and eastern Ukraine. It could also affect the future of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and perhaps even California, when Mexicans achieve simple majority in those states. (On current form the question is indeed “when,” not “if.”) State Department officials Nicholas Burns and Daniel Fried still insist that no precedent would be set by creating an independent Kosovo, but they cannot control reality and their assurances are nonsensical.
  3. The likely cost of persevering will exceed any conceivable benefits of such policy to the United States. The Muslim world will not be appeased by Kosovo today any more than it was appeased by Bosnia a decade ago. America will not earn any brownie points among the world’s “Jihadists of all color and hue” (Rep. Tom Lantos) for creating a new Muslim state in the heart of Europe. Albanian “gratitude” would prove as valuable to America today as it has been, over the years, to Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and Communist China. On the other hand, the failure to create an independent, internationally recognized Kosovo would be yet another sign that Mr. Bush has no clothes and that America has no sureness of touch. Furthermore, favoring the imposition of a “solution” from the outside against the will of one of the parties could set a dangerous long-term precedent for Israel.

Insisting on Kosovo Independence Irrational and Self-Defeating

The U.S. policy is not sensible. It panders to the aspirations of a small and primitive, yet shrewdly opportunistic nation with territorial pretensions against all of her neighbors. Mr. Bush’s histrionics in Tirana were greeted almost as enthusiastically as Benito Mussolini, Nikita Khrushchev, and Chou En-Lai had been greeted by the Albanians over the decades. As Nicholas Stavrou noted in The National Herald, Mr. Bush fits into the Albanians’ talent for choosing patrons who fulfill three criteria: they must be big enough, far enough, and willing to offend the interests of Albania’s neighbors.

It is plainly irrational to insist on Kosovo’s independence, with all the risks such policy entails, while the United States faces so many other “unfinished businesses” around the globe. The list is well known, and depressing. Iraq is a disaster, and there is no light at the end of the tunnel. Afghanistan is a lesser calamity only when compared to Iraq. Any solution to the challenge presented by Iran will depend on Washington’s ability to have Russia on its side as a partner, which is impossible if Moscow’s concerns over Kosovo are treated as illegitimate. Russia is also an essential partner in helping control Kim Jong Il and devising a sustainable long-term energy policy for the Western world.

Geopolitical and pragmatic arguments notwithstanding, the most important reason the United States should not support Kosovo’s independence is, and always has been, cultural and civilizational; but trying to explain that to the chief executive who is fanatically supportive of a blanket amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens in the United States is as futile as trying to reform Islam.

Entire article...

Cartoon by Petar Pismestrovic (Austria)

Bush—Ceku Hostage Crisis

Albanian separatists

James Jatras: Washington Has No Support for Unilateral Moves

Speaking for the Ottawa based Serbian radio program “Monday’s Encounter” Director of the American Council for Kosovo James Jatras explains why is the withdrawal of Washington-sponsored new resolution draft from the UN Security Council good news for the Serbs.

“If they were determined to try to impose the solution outside the Security Council,” Jatras said, “they would have gone forward with the vote knowing that the Russians would have vetoed it. They would use that as a pretext to say: ‘Now you see we don’t have any other choice but to try some other way.’”

“The fact that they did not even do that but rather they pulled back is to me an indication that they don’t have enough strength and the Washington government cannot count on the support of the European countries for a solution outside the Security Council. It means they are taking a step back. They may even go back to blabbing for a while in the Contact Group to figure out what their next step is,” said Jatras.

Kosovo Province Issue Cannot be Settled Outside the UN SC

“Certainly it cannot be settled in the Contact Group. Solana said the other day they would figure out something outside of the Security Council and go to the Contact Group. How can the Contact Group settle anything? There is no standing of a Contact Group under any concept of the international law,” Jatras explained.

“The Contact Group has no weight to supplant the statement from the Security Council in the Resolution 1244. It is simply an informal talk shop. They would have to go back to the Security Council or find some pretext for the unilateral declaration on independence and see whether Washington can force that through against the Russian opposition and cause a complete confusion among the Europeans.”

War Criminal Ceku in Washington: Who’s Holding Whom?

“Frankly, the big question here is: Is Bush Ceku’s hostage, or is Ceku Bush’s hostage? It is not entirely clear if Bush is now in the position where if Ceku goes ahead with the declaration on independence, will he feel bound to recognize it? To the contrary, is Ceku in the position where he cannot move forward without Bush giving him a green light? It is becoming very clear with the more general collapse of the authority of the Bush administration, not only internationally but also even domestically, that they are going to have trouble delivering promises they had made to Albanians all these years. The latest developments in the Security Council show that neither Moscow nor Belgrade are letting any kind of trickery get pass them. I am glad to see that Belgrade appears to be very united on a very clear and principled position, which will be clearer in any further negotiation that takes place now,” concluded Jatras.

Cartoon by Milenko Kosanovic (Serbia)

July 22, 2007

Brand New Trophies 2

Serbia U19 Basketball World Champions

Basketball: Serbia Beats U.S. for U19 World Title

Official FIBA web site reports that although the United States “came back from 19 points down [it] could not stop Serbia winning the FIBA U19 World Championship final 74-69.”

Serbia’s Mladen Jeremic was his team’s leading scorer, praised for never leaving the court as he played the full 40 minutes and “inspired the hosts’ win with 24 points, including two in the final five seconds to put his side out of reach.”

At the same time, Milan Macvan, 17-year-old Serb awarded 2007 FIBA U19 World Championship MVP [Most Valuable Player] title, has pulled a true coup against the U.S. with 13 pointers out of 14, and 19 points in total. Stefan Stojacic scored 14.

Ivan Lendjer sets the record

“They have an outstanding team. They’re strong, they’re very big and they play very good defense,” said USA and DePaul head coach Jerry Wainwright. “We obviously lost the game at the free throw line.”

Swimming: Who’d Have Guessed Serbia is “Landlocked”

Another gold medal to Serbia today comes from the swimming’s European Junior Championships in Antwerp, Belgium, where Ivan Lendjer won the first place in the 100 meters butterfly, setting the championship record of 53.21 seconds, 0.69 sec ahead of Yauheni Lazuka, of Belarus.

‘Major Success’ Explained

Gratitude
Photo from Belgrade April rally for preservation of Kosovo-Metohija province within Serbia.

Minister Samardzic Elaborates on the Major Achievement: Kosovo Change of Course

“The withdrawal of the new draft resolution which was designed to push Ahtisaari plan through the back door and which would have resulted in the independence of Kosovo province, as well as the UN Security Council decision to assign the Contact Group with the task of organizing new negotiations represent a major success of Serbian politics and diplomacy, thanks to the overwhelming and decisive support by the Russian state policy,” said Serbian Kosovo-Metohija Minister Slobodan Samardzic.

Samardzic reminded that the diplomatic battle within the Security Council against the imposition of such document lasted month and a half, before the decision was reached to withdraw the latest, sixth version of the resolution draft, “with its sponsors resolving to stop pursuing that same course.”

“Taking this type of draft off the agenda has finally eliminated Ahtisaari’s proposal, and the entire endeavor has been foiled,” stressed Kosovo-Metohija Minister at the press conference in Serbian Government.

Contact Group Can’t “Take Over” the Role of UN Security Council

“Our position remains the same: negotiations without crippling conditions. Those Ahtisaari led were unsuccessful and the Contact Group will keep that in mind. The danger of enforcing a predetermined solution and of obstructing the real negotiations, or of making them impossible and trivial, has thus been removed,” said Samardzic.

According to Minister Samardzic, “Serbia is right now facing the positive challenge: preparations for the fair and real negotiations, which will be the precondition to reaching a compromise solution.” He said that the Contact Group won’t have a difficult task, because it is now “clear which sort of things must not be done, what can’t and what should be done.” Samardzic explained that the Contact Group’s task is not to decide the status of the Serbian province, but to arrange the settings and the framework for new negotiations, to contact the parties and make them sit at the negotiating table.

Minister Samardzic clarified that there is no “transfer of power” from Security Council to the Contact Group, as some news agencies seem to believe. He added that there indeed is no Russian (or anybody else’s) veto within the Contact Group, but that is simply because there is no final decision-making within the Contact Group either.

“Whatever the Contact Group agrees upon, and with Belgrade’s and Pristina’s consent, the negotiations will begin, they will be observed by t