Seizure of Serbian Province Impermissible

The world without the law — U.S.-led NATO world.
Putin: Seizure of Serbian Province Impermissible
“While Serbia defends its territorial integrity, Russia stresses that the peace in Europe should rest on norms of international law,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said at a ceremony of receiving credentials from ambassadors of several states on Friday.
“Today, the people of Serbia are defending the sovereignty and territorial integrity of their country. Our stance is well known — the peace in Europe cannot be built without consideration for basic norms of international law, including the principles of the Helsinki Final Act,” Putin said.
According to Helsinki Final Act Most Western States are Thugs and Criminals
The Helsinki Final Act, signed by 35 states, including United States, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Vatican, and what was Soviet Union and Yugoslavia back in 1975 stresses in the clear-cut terms that participating states:
- [...] will respect each other's sovereign equality and individuality as well as all the rights inherent in and encompassed by its sovereignty, including in particular the right of every State to juridical equality, to territorial integrity and to freedom and political independence [...] They consider that their frontiers can be changed, in accordance with international law, by peaceful means and by agreement.
- [...] will refrain [...] from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations and with the present Declaration. No consideration may be invoked to serve to warrant resort to the threat or use of force in contravention of this principle [...]
- [...] they will refrain from any manifestation of force for the purpose of inducing another participating State to renounce the full exercise of its sovereign rights.

“The participating States will refrain [...] from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State [...] No consideration may be invoked to serve to warrant resort to the threat or use of force in contravention of this principle,” Helsinki Final Act.
Photo: Version of leaflets NATO bombers were dropping on Yugoslavia during the U.S.-led 1999 aggression. Click to view large
- The participating States regard as inviolable all one another's frontiers [...] and therefore they will refrain now and in the future from assaulting these frontiers. Accordingly, they will also refrain from any demand for, or act of, seizure and usurpation of part or all of the territory of any participating State.
- [They] will respect the territorial integrity of each of the participating States [...and] refrain from any action inconsistent with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations against the territorial integrity, political independence or the unity of any participating State, and in particular from any such action constituting a threat or use of force.
- The participating States will likewise refrain from making each other's territory the object of military occupation or other direct or indirect measures of force in contravention of international law, or the object of acquisition by means of such measures or the threat of them. No such occupation or acquisition will be recognized as legal.
- [They] will settle disputes among them by peaceful means in such a manner as not to endanger international peace and security, and justice. They will endeavour in good faith and a spirit of co-operation to reach a rapid and equitable solution on the basis of international law.
- For this purpose they will use such means as negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement or other peaceful means [...] In the event of failure to reach a solution by any of the above peaceful means, the parties to a dispute will continue to seek a mutually agreed way to settle the dispute peacefully.
- Participating States, parties to a dispute among them, as well as other participating States, will refrain from any action which might aggravate the situation to such a degree as to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security and thereby make a peaceful settlement of the dispute more difficult.
- The participating States will refrain from any intervention, direct or indirect, individual or collective, in the internal or external affairs falling within the domestic jurisdiction of another participating State, regardless of their mutual relations.
- They will accordingly refrain from any form of armed intervention or threat of such intervention against another participating State.
- They will likewise in all circumstances refrain from any other act of military, or of political, economic or other coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by another participating State of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.
- Accordingly, they will, inter alia, refrain from direct or indirect assistance to terrorist activities, or to subversive or other activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another participating State.

...And They Know It
Now, one of the first thoughts that comes to mind after reading this is to print out the integral text of Helsinki Final Act and send it to each member of the U.S. State Department, U.S. Senate, Congress and White House, to each of the bureaucrats in London’s No. 10 Downing Street and all of the British MPs, to The Palais de l' Elysée, German Bundestag and elsewhere, just so the signatories get informed about the heaps of laws they violated during the butchering of former Yugoslavia, with ruthless NATO aggression, during the series of color-coded revolutions they swiped the Eastern Europe with by enthroning Western servants and sycophants, and in their ongoing war against Serbia and Russia.
But, on second thought, it becomes obvious the thugs are already well acquainted with the document they signed, except that they prefer to treat is as To Do list.
Take a look at diagram that shows Nazi swastika is built in NATO symbol, from the German web site about swastika symbolism.
Comments
"Don't wait for me"
It is a good job none of the Yugoslav soldiers did as NATO was too scared that they would be shot down.
Also interesting is NATO's presumption that Milosevic had given orders to commit genocide.
I guess a VJ soldier reading it would have thought it more amusing and wouldn't have taken it seriously.
Posted by: Philip Davies | July 28, 2007 03:22 AM
Quite right, Philip. The insulting and utterly ridiculous claim of "orders to commit genocide" aside, I know for a fact that VJ had some good laughs over the leaflets urging them to just drop everything (and everyone) and leave. No one did.
Also, if I'm not mistaken, this is a photo of an Apache chopper Clinton was threatening with, but decided not to send in at all after VJ bombers destroyed half a dozen of them on Tirana (Albania) military airport. Western press never reported the catastrophic loss of expensive attack-birds, except for few that were reported here as destroyed in mysterious crashes in Albania (one hit the mountain, the other an electric post or something like that).
So, the proper message should've been: Don't wait for me, 'cause I'm not coming!
Posted by: Svetlana | July 28, 2007 10:58 AM
…Western press never reported the catastrophic loss of expensive attack-birds…
While western press or main stream media failed to mention a huge loss of Apache helicopters, Serbian media as well as other none-main stream media did report the loses.
NATO's Secret Losses, How Serbs Launched Stealth Raids Destroying Scores of NATO Aircraft on the Ground
Posted by: Alfred E. Newman | July 29, 2007 09:24 AM
Excellent, Alfred, I thought those have not been translated (there's few more I read from different Serbian sources, including the VJ HQs reports after each mission).
There was also one where it was revealed that NATO "consulted" a Croat general who served before with the Yugoslav Army (JNA) "if we send 24 Apache after the VJ stationed in Kosovo, how many can we expect back" and he told them "None".
Posted by: Svetlana | July 29, 2007 12:23 PM
Here is one more interesting article pertaining to Serbs taking advantage of anything at their disposal to fight NATO.
How Serb Dummies Fooled NATO Dummies
Posted by: Alfred E. Newman | July 29, 2007 03:39 PM