« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 31, 2007

John Bolton: Misguided U.S. Policy on Kosovo Continues

Ambassador John Bolton

Bolton: I Hope that the U.S. Won’t Recognize a Unilateral Declaration of Kosovo Independence

Interviewer Branko Mikasinovich, Voice of America, Washington, Oct. 30, 2007

Shortly before publication of the book of former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, titled “Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations and Abroad,” our colleague Branko Mikasinovich talked with Bolton about his experience at the United Nations and the State Department, about US relations with Serbia and about the issue of the future status of Kosovo.

State Department: “If They Knew How we Formulate our Foreign Policy, Americans would be Very Dissatisfied”

Bolton: I wanted to write a book on the foreign policy of President Bush, in other words about the things we did well or we did badly, especially about decisions in which I have personally participated, and about how the policy is actually formulated within the State Department and the United Nations. I quote, for example, a statement of one senior State Department official who told me once that if they knew how we formulate our foreign policy, Americans would be very dissatisfied. I wanted to point that out so people could have a better understanding of the whole process. I hope that I have managed to do that.

VOA: Is there a denial of reality in US policy regarding extreme Islam?

Bolton: Historically, it is very difficult to identify a new threat, as the case was with Nazism in Europe, and it took us a long time to spot the international danger of Communism. I am not sure whether radical Islam would reach such a level of threat, but the threat is real as we have all witnessed during the terrorist attacks on the US in 2001, attacks in Madrid and London, then in Asia, Indonesia, Iraq, Lebanon and the Palestinian-occupied territories. We need to pay more attention to that threat and we shouldn’t take any steps which would further increase it, especially not in Europe.

VOA: Recently, the Washington Post published an article about your strong disagreement with the State Department regarding some disputed international issues. Is there a disagreement regarding Kosovo too?

Over Fifteen Years of State Department’s Anti-Serbian Policy

Bolton: I think that the State Department has had an anti-Serbian policy for more than 15 years. When Yugoslavia was falling apart and Milosevic conducted his policy, there was some logic to our opposition to such a policy. Unfortunately, this biased policy has continued, even though there’s no logical explanation for it. While Serbia is trying to establish an effective and functional democracy regarding human rights and other issues, the anti-Serbian policy has continued, especially with regard to Kosovo, where a decision in favor of its independence could only create other concerns, and such a decision could impact on the democracy in progress in Serbia, and the possibility that the Security Council would step beyond its authority, which would be very unfortunate. This is one of the numerous examples of behavior by the State Department, which is a problem the next President has to solve.

VOA: In your opinion, what is the most important reason for US support for Kosovo independence?

Bolton: It is an attitude inherited from the 1990s from the policy of the former administration, when some parts of former Yugoslavia, according to legitimate and historic reasons, wanted their independence and their own road to democracy. This trend has continued, so now you have smaller and smaller entities asking for independence, but such a policy is the opposite of democracy. I think that now this has been spotted much better in Europe than it has been here in the United States.

VOA: If the US recognizes a unilateral declaration of Kosovo independence, how could that affect Washington’s relationship with Russia or relations with some countries of the European Union and on the international level in general?

Recognition of Unilateral Independence Rewards Terror and Sows the Seeds for Future Conflicts

Bolton: I hope that the United States will not recognize a unilateral declaration of Kosovo independence, although I think that things are currently moving in that direction, and I am afraid that it could cause more damage than it can bring good in the Balkans. Such a decision, which would be taken under threat of violence, would actually represent a way to reward bad behavior. The issue of Kosovo should be solved by two parties at the negotiation table. I understand that strong positions are taken regarding the issue by both sides - Albanian and Serbian. These are and will be tough negotiations in order to reach a solution which would satisfy both parties, but this is much better than to impose a solution on one side or the other, based on a wrong understanding of the situation.

VOA: What could Belgrade do in order to influence Washington’s position on Kosovo?

Bolton: I am not sure if there’s anything that can be done at this moment regarding official US pronouncements. It would be best for Belgrade to focus its diplomacy on Europe, where they have a much better understanding of the problems which could arise in the Balkans with a unilateral declaration of Kosovo independence. Since the breakdown of Yugoslavia, we have tried to ensure stability in the Balkans but we haven’t managed to complete it, and there are lots of unresolved issues. However, it seems to me, that the last thing we should do is to sow the seeds for future conflicts under the pressure of one side or the other.

Translation from a Serbian edition of VOA courtesy of American Council for Kosovo

October 30, 2007

Building Berlin Wall in Serbia

Berlin Wall
West seems to be suffering from a Berlin Wall nostalgia — they are now trying to build a new one in Serbia.

Negotiating Process Must be Conducted Within the Resolution 1244

According to Tanjug, Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica, who is also Serbian State Negotiating Team Co-Chairman, has announced he will participate in the talks in the ongoing negotiating process on the future organization of Kosovo and Metohija scheduled for November 5 in Vienna.

“This will be an important meeting, because Serbia will insist on a clear definition of the negotiating process which must be conducted within the framework of the Resolution 1244. This means that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Serbia must be respected and essential autonomy for the Albanian national minority in the Province guaranteed,” Kostunica told Tanjug.

Ischinger’s Suggestion will be Resolutely Rejected

The prime minister stressed that it was clear Serbia will resolutely reject the new proposal in case the EU representative in the mediation Troika Wolfgang Ischinger suggests on November 5 to organize Serbian Kosovo-Metohija province according to the model of two former German states.

“There isn’t a single letter about the independence for the Province in the UN Security Council Resolution 1244, just as there is no mention of a model that in 1972 existed between the two German states. Thereby, in keeping with Resolution 1244, such a suggestion cannot in any way be the subject of talks,” the Serbian prime minister said.

German Mediator Wants to Build Berlin Wall in Serbia

Earlier, based on its diplomatic sources, Tanjug reported that EU representative in the Contact Group negotiation Troika Wolfgang Ischinger has proposed to the Troika that Serbia and Serbian southern province of Kosovo should arrange relations as two states, in the way East and West Germany did under the 1972 Berlin Agreement.

Ischinger has thus practically formalized his idea, referring to the Berlin agreement, which is something Tanjug’s diplomatic sources had indicated last week.

The aim of the Berlin agreement was to establish good neighborly relations of the two German states and guarantee de facto, but not de jure, recognition of East Germany.

By promotion of the German 1972 example, diplomats indicated, Ischinger obviously has in mind the Pristina separatists’ “offer on good neighborly relations of two independent states,” presented within the talks on the future status of Serbia’s southern province, and certainly not Serbia’s refusal to split its own state.

Serbia Can Never Accept Anything Similar

The problem with Ischinger’s possible historic example, as evaluated by diplomats, is in fact the inappropriate comparison, because in the German case there were two separate states which looked for ways of upgrading coexistence, while the current Kosovo-Metohija issue is completely opposite and boils down to the efforts to divide a sovereign state by force.

“If this information is correct, I can only say that Serbia can never accept a document with such or any similar content,” Serbian Kosovo-Metohija Minister Slobodan Samardzic told Tanjug. He added that Belgrade doubts the veracity of the information, as well as the possibility of negotiating Troika offering such a suggestion.

“We Would be Very Surprised...”

“Therefore, we do not expect that to happen, because that would mean we would be offered to recognize our own province as an independent state,” said Samardzic.

He reminded that the Berlin agreement signed in 1972 had a practical purpose for two German states to recognize each other, while the document itself designated each as a sovereign state with their own territorial integrity.

“Kosovo-Metohija is an entirely different case. It is a province within Serbian state, currently under the international administration of the United Nations and its status will be determined during the negotiations within the framework of the Resolution 1244,” Kosovo Minister stressed.

Samardzic added that the framework of the UN Security Council Resolution 1244 “does not allow for a creation of an agreement similar to the one signed between the two German states in 1972 and we would be very surprised if anyone from the mediating Troika were to suggest anything of the kind.”

October 29, 2007

Albanian Muslims Turn Muslim When it Suits Them

Moderate Muslims

Despite Western Assurances of Albanian “Secularism”...

Serbia’s neighbor Albania, which joined the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in 1992, a few months after the collapse of its hard-line communist regime, is actively lobbying the Islamic bloc of states to recognize southern Serbian province of Kosovo as an independent state, according to BIRN.

Albanian Prime Minister Sali Berisha has called on Egypt to persuade the Organization of the Islamic Conference member-states to recognize as a bloc a unilateral declaration of independence by Kosovo Albanian separatists.

While presenting Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit with Albanian separatist view of the situation in the Serbian province, Berisha asked his host to use Egypt’s considerable influence with the other Arab states.

Gheit promised the Albanian prime minister that his country would make a substantial effort to make amputation of Serbian Kosovo province a priority issue at the next OIC Islamic Summit Conference, due in Senegal in March 2008.

Albania is the only country in Europe where the majority of the population are Muslims but, just like Albanian minority in Serbia, it has a pronounced tendency to play down its Islamic world view and to insist on its alleged secularism whenever appealing to the Western public for the sake of nationalistic political goals, i.e. striving to recreate Greater Albania that existed only during a brief Hitler-Mussolini Axis.

Greater Albania was a fascist state during the WWII and it incorporated forcibly adjoined regions of neighboring states, like Serbian province of Kosovo-Metohija. Albanian fascists have committed the most grievous war crimes in Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia and Albania during the WWII in a continuous effort to wipe out the entire region of all Christian and Jewish population.

Dangerous Destruction of the World Order

NATO future

Destruction of the World Order Leads to Destruction of the World

Kosovo and the Westphalian Order, by Ambassador James Bissett, Chronicles Magazine

The breakup of the Yugoslav federation was the first serious diplomatic challenge facing the Western democracies following the collapse of the Soviet Union. They made a mess of it. They are still making a mess of it; and if a decision is made in the coming months to grant independence to the Albanians in Kosovo—as the United States seems determined to do—then the decision will simply add to, and compound, the many errors and mistakes made by the US-led Western powers before, during, and after the disintegration of the former Yugoslavia.

From the beginning of the break up of Yugoslavia the policies followed by the United States and NATO countries have been marked by duplicity, double standards and cowardice. They have forgotten the role played by Serbia in two world wars and they have deliberately demonized Serbia and the Serbian people. They have falsely blamed Serbia for the breakup of Yugoslavia and for all of the atrocities committed in the wars that followed. They have set up that “travesty of justice”—The Hague Tribunal—to perpetuate these myths.

More seriously, western intervention in the former Yugoslavia has shaken the global framework of international peace and security that has governed the relationship among sovereign states since the founding of the United Nations.

Invaluable Principles of Territorial Integrity and Non-Interference in the Internal Affairs

The origins of that framework date back to the peace of Westphalia in 1648 which ended the horrors of the religious wars that devastated Germany and other parts of Europe for more almost half a century.

Westphalia laid down the basic tenets of sovereignty—the principle of territorial integrity and of non-interference in the affairs of national states. These are principles that have proven invaluable through the years in the prevention of armed conflict between states. The Westphalian order has frequently been violated, but age has not diminished the principles themselves. They remain the essential components of international law.

Article 2 [4] of the UN Charter includes territorial integrity as one of the key principles prohibiting the threat or use of force in the resolution of international disputes, and it is one of the paramount elements in the Charter relating to the concept of sovereign equality.

There are those who believe the United Nations is a corrupt organization and there is abundant evidence to back up such a charge. Apart from anything else the shameful manner in which the UN establishment has deliberately sabotaged its own resolution 1244 in Kosovo is proof enough of corruption and malicious mismanagement.

Nevertheless, it is one thing to condemn the UN organization but another thing to therefore disavow the principles enshrined in the United Nations charter. These principles represent the difference between the rule of law and the law of the jungle.

Sovereignty, respect for borders and international law, the peaceful settlement of international disputes, and the territorial integrity of states remain as valid today as they did when the UN was founded. These principles were reinforced by the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 and were given further emphasis by including a section on the inviolability of frontiers.

Section III of that Act (“Inviolability of Frontiers”) says: “the participating states regard as inviolable all one another’s frontiers as well as the frontiers of all states in Europe and therefore will refrain now and in future from assaulting these frontiers. Accordingly, they will also refrain from any demand for, or act of, seizure and usurpation of part or all of the territory of any participating state.”

Section IV (“Territorial Integrity of States”) pledges the participating states to respect the territorial integrity of each of the participating states: “Accordingly, they will refrain from any action inconsistent with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations against the territorial integrity, political independence or the unity of any participating state and in particular from any such action constituting a threat or use of force The participating states will likewise refrain from making each other’s territory the object of military occupation or other direct or indirect measures of force in contravention of international law, or the object of acquisition by means of such measures or the threat of them. No such occupation or acquisition will be regarded as legal.”

These are fundamental principles. They were designed as a guarantee that all nations, small as well as large, need not fear aggression by a more powerful neighbor.

Even Hitler Insisted on Appearance of Following the International Law

They were meant to have universal application and they cannot be set aside because of special circumstances or when they prove inconvenient to the policy aims of the larger powers. Their message is simple and clear. Borders can be changed - but only through agreement by the states involved.

In this regard it is interesting to note that in 1938, at the time of Munich, president Edvard Benes of Czechoslovakia, bullied by the British and French, signed the agreement to hand over the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia to Germany, thus giving his consent to the transaction. It would seem that even Hitler insisted on at least the appearance of following the rules of international conduct.

US-Led NATO Aggression on Yugoslavia Marked the Return to Barbarism

The determination of the United States to remove Kosovo and Metohija from Serbia and to grant independence to the Albanians living there is a threat to the Westphalian order and an unequivocal violation of international law. It also has far reaching implications for global peace and security.

Shortly after NATO aircraft began the bombing of Serbia in the spring of 1999 I wrote an article in one of Canada’s national newspapers entitled “A Return to Barbarism.”

In the article I condemned the bombing as a violation of international law and of the UN charter and of NATO’s own treaty. But the point of the article was to stress that the bombing marked an historical turning point.

As the 20th century was coming to the end there had been a brief period after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall when we were offered the encouraging prospects of a “pax Americana.” Many believed the United States was the one country that might guarantee that the new century would see an end to war and violence.

After two cataclysmic world wars and the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world was offered the hope that the new century would follow the principles laid down in the united nations and that the Westphalian order would be restored.

Alas, these hopes were shattered with the bombing of Serbia by the US-led NATO powers. This was a naked act of aggression against a sovereign state. Sadly, it had been carried out by the democratic nations whose political leaders never failed to sing the praises of the rule of law and the UN charter. It was a foreboding warning of things to come.

Use of Force to Achieve Policy Objectives Replaces International Law

The bombing of Serbia established an ominous precedent. It meant the United States and the NATO countries could intervene wherever and whenever they wished. The use of force or the threat of it would be used whether within the law or not and having set the precedent with the bombing of Serbia the decision to invade Iraq was easy.

The American insistence on giving the Albanians independence and unilaterally handing over 15% of Serbian territory to the criminal leaders of Kosovo is simply a further example of the willingness of the United States to use naked power to achieve its policy objectives.

It would seem the only obstacle in the way of the American desire to create an independent Kosovo is a resurgent Russia. Ironically, it is Russia that is insisting on compliance with the principles of international law and the UN charter before any consideration is given to Kosovo independence. This in itself is a remarkable development.

New Breed of American Leaders

It would almost seem that the new breed of American political leaders—the Clintons, the Albrights, the Holbrookes, the neoconservatives, George Bush and others like them—have betrayed the trust bestowed upon them by the founding fathers of their great Republic.

By doing so they have abandoned the very principles upon which America was founded and which are enshrined in the UN charter by doing so they have lost the moral authority that formed the real strength of the democratic countries in overcoming the forces of totalitarianism. They have also delivered a damaging blow to the Westphalian order. It will not be easy to get it back.

October 28, 2007

Pressure Pristina for a Change

Free and Fair Negotiations

Serbs Offered Numerous Constructive Proposals, Kosovo Albanian Separatists — Not a Single One

During his talks with the German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Serbian Vice Premier Bozidar Djelic called on Germany and the international community to exert pressure on Kosovo Albanian separatists in the same way they have been pressuring Belgrade authorities during the negotiations.

“I have pointed to the constructiveness of our approach and the numerous original proposals that we have put forward, while the same thing cannot be said for the Kosovo Albanians, who have failed to introduce a single new element during the current talks. I have called the international community, the mediating Troika and Germany to exert pressure on Pristina the same way they are pressuring Belgrade, so that they too finally come up with some concrete proposals,” the deputy prime minister said following a meeting with Steinmeier.

Djelic stressed that the talks had reached a stalemate because of a lack of cooperation on behalf of the Kosovo Albanian separatists, and underlined that Belgrade had a red line that could not be crossed.

Germany Supports Serbia

“Germany has a central role in the talks because of its relations with both Russia and the U.S, and the role of Wolfgang Ischinger in the mediating Troika, and I think we are in the right place here to draw their attention to Serbia’s arguments,” he said.

Serbia’s Vice Premier reiterated that Steinmeier, who was elected SPD vice-president at the party’s congress where the two men had met earlier, had encouraged Belgrade to put forward as many elements of compromise as possible within its proposal during the negotiations.

“It is clear that the international community views December 10 as one of the key moments, though we haven’t been told that that will necessarily be the end of talks. I would even go so far as to say that his encouragement to Belgrade to continue putting forward constructive proposals represents some kind of guarantee of a platform for the Troika to suggest possible extension of the talks,” said Djelic.

During his meeting with Steinmeier, it was pointed out that Germany considered it vital to preserve stability in the region, and for Serbia to continue her democratic and European development, which Germany was eager to support.

Cartoon by Milenko Kosanovic (Serbia)

October 27, 2007

Bosnian High Representative Responsible for the Crisis

Policing the world

Serbian President Calls on Lajcak to Reevaluate his Measures

“The voice of Republic of Srpska (RS) must be respected because the Dayton Accord stipulates that changes to any principles have to be supported by the consensus of all three of the constituent peoples. As a signatory of the peace agreement, Serbia is dedicated to that principle,” Serbia’s President Boris Tadic told Tanjug today.

“We respect the territorial integrity of every state, Bosnia-Herzegovina unambiguously so. Bosnia’s constitutionality is based on the principles of the Dayton Accords, and no decisions can be made at the expense of one of the constituent nations,” said Tadic.

Diplomats Ought to be Able to Refrain from Threatening With Their Country’s Swift Revenge

Serbian President called on Lajcak to reach a compromise with RS Prime Minister Milorad Dodik, and to react to inappropriate messages that certain officials in Bosnia had been issuing to Serbs.

Inappropriate and undiplomatic remarks containing threats were not a solution to the dispute, Tadic said, and called on the international community and Bosnian officials to temper their passions, and to respect the Dayton Accords as a guarantee of peace and stability.

Serbian Government Fully Supports Republika Srpska Premier

Serbian Interior Minister Dragan Jocic has said that Serbian government firmly supports Republika Srpska Premier Dodik in his attempts to ensure the functioning and status of the Serbian republic, in keeping with the principles enshrined in the Dayton Agreement.

“As a signatory of the Dayton Accords, Serbia insists on their verbatim implementation and the preservation of Republika Srpska,” Jocic told Tanjug today.

The interior minister added that the high representative had to be mindful of the fact that under the accords, Bosnia-Hercegovina was not a unitary state, but a state made up of two entities, and that the Republika Srpska status was guaranteed by the treaty.

Not Free to Violate Laws When Hurting Serbs is the Objective

“Lajcak’s measures have already provoked a serious crisis and they have to be immediately withdrawn. It has to be said that the entire responsibility for the possible worsening of the relations in Bosnia lies on [Bosnia’s High Representative] Lajcak, due to his attempts to impose his dictate and abolish Republika Srpska,” Minister Jocic said.

He stressed that Serbia insists on the respect for Dayton Accords and preservation of Republika Srpska the same way it insists on respect for the UN Security Council Resolution 1244 that is preserving its southern province of Kosovo-Metohija.

“The international agreements and laws cannot be violated only when the violations are aimed at hurting the Serbian nation,” Jocic said.

If it’s OK for Portugal to Have a Say on Bosnia, Why is it Not OK for Serbia?

Meanwhile, responding to the Western mainstream media accusations that Republika Srpska representatives are being “spurred” to oppose Lajcak’s dictate by Russia and Serbia, Republika Srpska Prime Minister Dodik said that his government talks no more or less with Moscow and Belgrade than with any other state officials.

“Serbia, as one of the signatories of Dayton Agreement, has additional responsibilities and I don’t see why would someone think it’s normal for Portugal to comment and have its say on Bosnian relations, but Serbia should not have the same right,” Dodik said.

Cartoon by Nikola Volas (Serbia)

October 26, 2007

International Community Seeks to Abolish Republika Srpska

Premier Dodik with Ambassador English
Prime Minister Milorad Dodik (R) with the new American Ambassador to Bosnia, Charles English.

Lajcak’s Decision Unacceptable to Republika Srpska

Premier of the Serbian republic in Bosnia-Herzegovina (Republika Srpska) Milorad Dodik said that Serbian Republic’s leaders will not accept the latest decision imposed by the Bosnia High Representative Miroslav Lajcak, at the price of sanctioning the Serbian entity in Bosnia.

“Simply put, this is not a residence of a bunch of obedience-trainees and blind followers of the international community, even if United States is that International Community,” Dodik said in the RS TV interview. He was responding to the statement by the American ambassador to Bosnia-Herzegovina Charles English in which he called Republika Srpska leaders to accept Lajcak’s measures, or suffer the wrath of U.S.

Prime Minister Dodik said that RS leaders “cannot accept the violation of the Dayton Agreement and the Constitution” and therefore will not give up their position.

Revealing to the public that he has been holding intense talks with Ambassador English for the past few days, Dodik said he can “hardly believe ambassador would show such contempt for their discussions in this manner,” i.e. issuing a public demand for compliance followed by the threats in case Bosnian Serbs fail to obey Lajcak’s dictate.

American Ambassador’s Threats to Bosnian Serbs Unheard of in the Past Decade

Premier Dodik said that RS leadership has not caused any conflict, nor has it done anything contrary to the democratic practice. “Republika Srpska people must know that this generation of politicians is only striving to govern responsibly and that is why we cannot accept such arrogant trampling of the Constitution and Dayton Accord. Especially unacceptable are rude threats coming from the American ambassador, regardless of the fact that he is American ambassador,” said Dodik.

American Ambassador in Bosnia Charles English invited Serbian republic’s Premier and RS representatives to accept Lajcak’s measures “as they are.” “Conflict with the High Representative is the conflict with USA. The safety and stability of Bosnia-Herzegovina is in the interest of United States and we are prepared to defend it,” said English in an interview to Bosnian news agencies.

He warned that “if the path of the conflict continues, the reaction of United States will be swift and powerful.”

Premier Dodik responded that “there will be no withdrawal and that RS government will not back down,” adding that the entity leadership has been trying to establish a dialog with the High Representative Lajcak during the past few days.

Regarding the American Ambassador’s statement, Dodik said that “such a boorish threat hasn’t been heard around here in the past ten years.”

“They are insinuating, weaving stories about the non-existent conspiracies, they are trying to deny our right to think for ourselves, because they believe that sheer pressure will help them resolve some issues, including this one,” said Dodik.

Pointing out that he respects the United States, though it is “not his fault that a number of issues in the world are not going their way,” Dodik said that Republika Srpska officials are defending their basic right to a democratic choice.

Stressing that “not a single window has been broken in Republika Srpska,” he said that RS has the right to democracy, which includes a right to opposition. He said that his party, the Association of the Independent Social-Democrats (SNSD), will step over into the opposition on the state level (of Bosnia-Herzegovina state) in case they fail to persuade the international representatives to change their attitude.

Lawyers Associations: Lajcak Grossly Violates Both Bosnian and RS Constitution, Along with the Score of International Laws

High Representative for Bosnia-Herzegovina Miroslav Lajcak is in gross violation of the BiH Constitution and the Constitution of Republika Srpska with his decision on the changes and amendments to the law on the BiH Council of Ministers and the binding directive for changing the regulations on the work of the Parliamentary Assembly, lawyers’ associations of Serbia and the Republika Srpska announced on Friday.

In a joint statement issued by the Serbia and RS lawyers associations, Lajcak’s decision is additionally characterized as the violation of a whole score of the highest normative acts of the United Nations and other international organizations which, according to the Bosnian Constitution, have the precedence over all the other legal acts.

“High Representative’s authority to interpret the existing laws does not include the power to supersede the Constitution and legislative bodies. At the same time, his decisions must not violate the human rights, individual and collective rights, as determined by the international legal acts,” reads the statement.

Serbia’s and RS’ lawyers warned that, in the light of the above mentioned, enforcement of Lajcak’s decision “could lead to unforeseeable, heavy, even tragic consequences for the region.”

Lajcak is Striving to Abolish Republika Srpska

“High Representative’s decision is essentially, through the general procedural measures, revoking Republika Srpska status of the legal state entity in Bosnia-Herzegovina, which was established and guaranteed by the Dayton Peace Agreement,” the statement says.

Associations of lawyers of Serbia and Republika Srpska have issued the joint appeal, especially addressed to the participants of Dayton Peace Accords, to revoke Lajcak’s decision, respecting all the legal and legitimate democratic principles and the rule of law.

Association of Lawyers of Serbia and Republika Srpska have started the initiative for preservation of culture of peace, legal, political, economic and social safety on the territory of RS as a formative state entity of Bosnia-Herzegovina. They called for respect and strict adherence to adopted international laws, especially those that pertain to the right of self-determination of the nations that freely govern their political status and freely provide the economic, social and cultural development.

October 25, 2007

Resolution 1244 and Dayton Accord

Republika Srpska, Bosnia

Preservation of Kosovo and Republika Srpska Top Priorities for Serbia

Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica said on Thursday that Serbia will decisively defend Resolution 1244 and the Dayton Peace Accords, since the preservation of Kosovo and Republika Srpska [Serbian republic in Bosnia-Herzegovina] were “the top-priority goals of our country and our national policy.”

“The measures of (High Representative for Bosnia-Herzegovina Miroslav) Lajcak and the Ahtisaari plan have the aim of annulling Resolution 1244 and the Dayton Agreement, so that an independence of Kosovo could be proclaimed and Republika Srpska be abolished. This is an open violation of the basic interests of the Serbian nation,” the prime minister said in a statement for the media.

Kostunica stressed that “Serbia, as a signatory of the Dayton Agreement, will give all possible support to (RS Prime Minister Milorad) Dodik and the institutions of Republika Srpska in preserving the status granted to the Serbian republic by the Dayton Accords. The preservation of Kosovo and Republika Srpska are now the top-priority goals of our country and our national policy.”

“I have informed Prime Minister Dodik that he can count on Serbia’s full support, and that together we will decisively defend both Resolution 1244 and the Dayton Peace Accords,” Kostunica said.

Lajcak’s Dictatorial Decision Leads to Abolition of Serbian Entity in Bosnia

The new High Representative for Bosnia Miroslav Lajcak imposed Friday a decision on amending the law on the Bosnian Council of Ministers, enforcing a decision that the Council of Ministers can hold a session if “a majority of its members are present.” This is effectively cutting out the participation of the representatives of the Serbian republic, since it enables the Muslim majority to impose decisions on Serbian entity in Bosnia.

Noting that it is unacceptable that Serbian entity be excluded from this majority, Republika Srpska Prime Minister Dodik explained that the Council of Ministers adopts series of decisions which are not forwarded to the Parliamentary Assembly, and that acceptance of Lajcak’s amendments would lead to Bosnia’s centralization and eventual abolition of Republika Srpska, taking away the right of the Bosnian Serbs to have a say in decisions that concern their very existence.

Komsic’s Belligerence and Primitivism Highlights the Problem

Serbian Prime Minister Media Adviser Srdjan Djuric criticized the statement of the Croat member of the Bosnian Presidency Zeljko Komsic, who threatened Serbian Premier to “keep his fingers away from Bosnia, because he could get both his fingers and his nose slapped.”

“Such primitive, boorish and belligerent statements by Komsic confirm the necessity for the most determined defense of the Dayton Agreement which guarantees the status of the separate entity and preservation of Republika Srpska,” Djuric told Beta news agency.

According to Djuric, as one of the guarantors of the Dayton Accord, Serbia has an obligation to ensure its implementation.

“Therefore, Serbian government fully supports Republika Srpska Premier Dodik to ensure the status of the Serbian entity is in compliance with the Dayton Agreement,” Djuric said. He added that “Komsic’s primitive vocabulary only deepens the crises created by Lajcak’s dictate.”

October 24, 2007

Russian Warnings Over Serbian Kosovo Province

Putin explains map to Bush
In case Serbian Kosovo province is severed despite Serbia’s opposition and in violation of the UN Charter and UN SC Resolution 1244, Moscow will recognize Russian-majority regions on the territory of former Soviet Union as independent states.

Moscow Ready to Recognize Russian-Majority Regions in the Neighborhood as Independent States

Reuters reports about an unnamed Russian diplomat who “hinted” on Wednesday that Moscow would recognize the Russian-majority regions in the territory of former Soviet Union as independent states, in case West allows unilateral proclamation of independence by the Albanian separatists in southern Serbian province of Kosovo.

Many other Russian representatives, including Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and President Putin himself, have openly said that there would be nothing to prevent Russian Federation from recognizing independence of Russian-majority regions in the former Soviet Union in case West decides to impose dismemberment of Serbia, directly violating the UN Charter and UN Security Council Resolution 1244. But Reuters reporters might’ve missed those earlier “hints.”

At the same time, RTS carried the latest statements of two named high officials of Russian Federation.

Kosovo Can Never Become a UN Member

“The United Nations will never recognize the unilateral independence of Kosovo and Metohija,” said Russia’s Permanent EU Representative Vladimir Chizhov. He also did not exclude the possibility of extending the negotiating Troika’s mandate beyond December 10. In addition, the issue can be referred back to the Contact Group, or a new mediator can be appointed.

According to Chizhov, allowing the unilateral proclamation would represent “a blow to the UN authority, since United Nations have never recognized the unilaterally declared independence.”

“Russia will never allow this,” said Russian diplomat, as reported by the Itar-Tass agency from Brussels.

Chizhov added that “only viable is a solution reached through the negotiations” and warned that, in case of the unilateral proclamation of Kosovo independence, the states that recognize it will “make a strategic mistake of global proportions,” consequences of which will reverberate “not only in the Balkans, but throughout Europe and through all of the unrecognized territories.”

UN Security Council will Determine the Format of Belgrade-Pristina Dialog After December 10

Head of the Russian mission in Brussels noted that negotiations about the status of Serbian province mediated by the Contact Group Troika are going better than expected. “Certain success has already been achieved,” he said, adding that at the last meetings in Brussels and Vienna Serbs and Albanian separatists talked directly to each other, while earlier each side addressed the Troika only.

Ideally, Belgrade and Pristina should be able to continue the negotiations directly, without mediators, Chizhov said, adding that Moscow does not view December 10 as the day when Troika’s mandate ends, nor as the end of negotiations. At that time, Troika should submit its progress report to the UN Secretary General, based on which the Security Council will determine the format of the future dialog.

Vladimir Chizhov confirmed that the issue of Serbian Kosovo-Metohija province will be discussed during the upcoming Russia-EU Summit scheduled for October 26, in Portugal.

International Community Cannot be Blackmailed

Russia’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Vladimir Titov said that raising tensions over the date when mediating Troika is to submit its progress report to the UN Secretary General — December 10 — is “unjustified and largely counterproductive.” He warned that unilateral proclamation of Serbian province’s independence would have “an infectious” effect on all the other contested territories.

“No one has the right to blackmail the international community. There can be no unilateral actions and decisions,” Titov told Itar-Tass agency at the end of his Balkan tour. He added that development of the Kosovo province situation will determine the perspective of the entire Balkan peninsula.

According to the high Russian representative, Moscow holds that “the aspect of time cannot be decisive” for resolving the future of Serbian province.

Titov said that on December 10 Contact Group’s Troika is expected to submit its report to the UN Secretary General, who will then present it to the Security Council. “The UN Security Council will review the situation and determine future steps,” stressed Russian Deputy Foreign Minister.

Unilateral Moves would Infect Other Contested Regions

Summing up the result of his talks in Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia and Bulgaria, Titov said that the compromise solution, reached through negotiations, will bring peace to the Balkans and beyond.

He warned that the unilateral proclamation of independence would be “infectious for other contested regions,” not only on the territory of the former Soviet Union, but also in Europe.

According to Titov, Balkan is the region with great potentials, where the inter-ethnic conflicts are fading, but the main challenge is to resolve the situation in Kosovo-Metohija. “The perspective of entire Balkans depends on how this situation develops,” said Titov.

He stressed that all the Balkan states, including Albania with its specific position, agree that solution for the Serbian province should be reached through compromise, by peaceful means and through negotiations. That is the only kind of solution, said Titov, that would not cause any negative consequences in the region and beyond.

Who Restarted the Cold War?

Madeleine the Cowgirl

If There Ever was a Case of Pot Calling the Kettle Black...

Article “Who Restarted the Cold War” by Patrick J. Buchanan, AntiWar.com

"Putin's Hostile Course," the lead editorial in the Washington Times of Oct. 18, began thus:

"Russian President Vladimir Putin's invitation to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to visit Moscow is just the latest sign that, more than 16 years after the collapse of Soviet communism, Moscow is gravitating toward Cold War behavior. The old Soviet obsession – fighting American imperialism – remains undiluted. ...

"(A)t virtually every turn, Mr. Putin and the Russian leadership appear to be doing their best in ways large and small to marginalize and embarrass the United States and undercut U.S. foreign policy interests."

The Times pointed to Putin's snub of Robert Gates and Condi Rice by having them cool their heels for 40 minutes before a meeting. Then came a press briefing where Putin implied Russia may renounce the Reagan-Gorbachev INF treaty, which removed all U.S. and Soviet medium-range missiles from Europe, and threatened to pull out of the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty, whereby Russia moved its tanks and troops far from the borders of Eastern Europe.

On and on the Times indictment went. Russia was blocking new sanctions on Iran. Russia was selling anti-aircraft missiles to Iran. Russia was selling weapons to Syria that found their way to Hezbollah and Hamas. Russia and Iran were talking up an OPEC-style natural gas cartel. All this, said the Times, calls to mind "Soviet-era behavior."

Why has Putin’s Russia Turned Hostile?

Missing from the prosecution's case, however, was the motive. Why has Putin's Russia turned hostile? Why is Putin mending fences with China, Iran and Syria? Why is Putin sending Bear bombers to the edge of American airspace? Why has Russia turned against America? For Putin's approval rating is three times that of George Bush. Who restarted the Cold War?

To answer that question, let us go back those 16 years.

What happened in 1991 and 1992?

Well, Russia let the Berlin Wall be torn down and its satellite states be voted or thrown out of power across Eastern Europe. Russia agreed to pull the Red Army all the way back inside its border. Russia agreed to let the Soviet Union dissolve into 15 nations. The Communist Party agreed to share power and let itself be voted out. Russia embraced freedom and American-style capitalism, and invited Americans in to show them how it was done.

Russia did not use its veto in the Security Council to block the U.S. war to drive Saddam Hussein, an ally, out of Kuwait. When 9-11 struck, Putin gave his blessing to U.S. troops using former republics as bases for the U.S. invasion.

Abused Friendship: In Response to Moscow’s Pro-American Policy, NATO Begins Aggressive Expansion

What was Moscow's reward for its pro-America policy?

The United States began moving NATO into Eastern Europe and then into former Soviet republics. Six ex-Warsaw Pact nations are now NATO allies, as are three ex-republics of the Soviet Union. NATO expansionists have not given up on bringing Ukraine, united to Russia for centuries, or Georgia, Stalin's birthplace, into NATO.

In 1999, the United States bombed Serbia, which has long looked to Mother Russia for protection, for 78 days, though the Serbs' sole crime was to fight to hold their cradle province of Kosovo, as President Lincoln fought to hold onto the American South. Now America is supporting the severing of Kosovo from Serbia and creation of a new Islamic state in the Balkans, over Moscow's protest.

While Moscow removed its military bases from Cuba and all over the Third World, we have sought permanent military bases in Russia's backyard of Central Asia.

We dissolved the Nixon-Brezhnev ABM treaty and announced we would put a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Under presidents Clinton and Bush, the United States financed a pipeline for Caspian Sea oil to transit Azerbaijan and Georgia to the Black Sea and Turkey, cutting Russia out of the action.

American Cold War Agencies Go to Overdrive

With the end of the Cold War, the KGB was abolished and the Comintern disappeared. But the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House and other Cold War agencies, funded with tens of millions in tax-exempt and tax dollars, engineered the ouster of pro-Russian regimes in Serbia, Ukraine and Georgia, and sought the ouster of the regime in Minsk.

At the Cold War's end, the United States was given one of the great opportunities of history: to embrace Russia, largest nation on earth, as partner, friend, ally. Our mutual interests meshed almost perfectly. There was no ideological, territorial, historic or economic quarrel between us, once communist ideology was interred.

We blew it.

We moved NATO onto Russia's front porch, ignored her valid interests and concerns, and, with our "indispensable-nation" arrogance, treated her as a defeated power, as France treated Weimar Germany after Versailles.

Who restarted the Cold War? Bush and the braying hegemonists he brought with him to power. Great empires and tiny minds go ill together.

Cartoon by Petar Pismestrovic (Austria)

October 23, 2007

Kosovo, Serbia’s Cross to Bear

Missing Key

Serbia Pays 100,000 Dollars Each Day for Kosovo Debt

The total foreign debt of Serbian Kosovo-Metohija province has reached the amount of 1,206 billion dollars and Serbia regularly settles it, allocating more than 100,000 dollars every day for this purpose, state institutions told Tanjug.

Six years ago, during the UNMIK/NATO/KLA rule of the province, the foreign debt of Kosovo-Metohija amounted to 1,7 billion dollars. It was reduced after the write-off of 500 million dollars of the claims of the Paris and London Clubs of Creditors and after Serbian state paid 130 million dollars from the Serbian budget.

Since 2002, Serbia has regularly settled the Kosovo debt, although it has had no revenues for the past eight years from this part of its territory.

According to the official data, by the end of 2006, Serbia settled the principal and interest of Kosovo banks and companies at the total amount of 217,69 million dollars.

The Kosovo-Metohija debt was created between early 1970s and late 1990s and the funds from foreign loans were invested in electric power, railway and metal-working industry projects, mining equipment, automotive industry, telecommunications, water resources management, textile industry and other industrial sectors.

Serbian Deputy Prime Minister Bozidar Djelic said on Sunday that the Serbian delegation in Washington had presented a draft solution for the issue of Kosovo-Metohija’s debt, under which Serbia should either be repaid 215 million dollars, or an equal amount should be deducted from Serbia’s remaining debt to the World Bank.

In other words: those who are profiting from the Serbian province should also foot the bills.

IMF: It’s Nice that They Want Independence, but Who’s Going to Finance Them?

The economic situation in Serbian Kosovo-Metohija province is not conducive to sustainable development. The province cannot finance itself due to low industrial output and the shortage of direct foreign investments, the International Monetary Fund said.

According to the International Monetary Fund, Kosovo economy is characterized by “unclear revenue structure, enormous foreign trade deficit and nearly inexistent industry.” Those who are running the province import over 80 percent of its consumption and the province’s main tax revenue comes from customs and excise collected at administrative points, IMF said.

Kosovo is also unable to secure the servicing of its 1,206 billion dollar foreign debt, said IMF.

How Much Foreign Investment Do You Need to Grow a Cucumber?

In his exceptional four-part article about Serbian province under the NATO/Albanian separatist rule, Swedish reporter Maciej Zaremba who spent six months in Kosovo-Metohija wrote:

“[...] Well into the eighth year of the UN mission, after spending close to twenty-two billion euros on an area the size of Scania (with a population of about 2 million), the black economy is thriving whereas the white one is close to collapse. There is a standard explanation to this misery: As long as Kosovo’s independence from Serbia is not confirmed, nobody dares to invest in the country. Very probable. But what investments do you need to grow cucumber?

“I comb the markets to find some local produce. The soap is from Bulgaria, the shirts from Taiwan. How about the flour? Czech. Drinking water from Hungary. Kosovo’s GNP per capita is lower than Rwanda’s, so it is a surrealistic feeling to have to buy tomatoes from Turkey and salad from Italy — in an agrarian country where the fields lie fallow.

“Why do they? Because, explains Mr. Bajrami at the [provisional] Chamber of Commerce, it pays better to sell chewing gum to the UN staff than to toil in the fields [...]”

It is certainly incomparably easier.

Cartoon by Nikola Otas (Serbia)

October 22, 2007

Shameful Betrayal of General Draza Mihailovich

General Draza Mihailovic
Life-long soldier and hero of two world wars, Serbian General Draza Mihailovic led Europe’s first organized military resistance against fascist occupier.

Shameful Betrayal of General Draza Mihailovic, Hero of Two World Wars

Free book available in PDF format, courtesy of Andy Wilcoxson, Slobodan-Milosevic.org

It is an Honor to be Called a Chetnik

Announcing the posting of the book about great Serbian hero of two World Wars, General Draza Mihailovic, Andy Wilcoxson writes:

“I have recently come into the possession of a remarkable book published in Great Britain in 1947. The book is entitled "General Mihailovich: The World's Verdict" and it is a collection of newspaper articles about Draza Mihailovic and the Serbian Chetnik movement. Many of the articles contained in the book were written by the U.S. and British servicemen who were attached to Mihailovic's Chetnik units during the war.

“The book destroys the communist propaganda that Mihailovic was a Nazi collaborator and any fair-minded person who reads it will realize that Gen. Mihailovic's only crime was resisting the twin evils of Hitler's fascism and Stalin's communism.

“This book chronicles the shame of the Greatest Generation, and I am by no means attacking our World War II veterans when I say that. To their credit, our servicemen were ashamed that America and Britain sold-out Yugoslavia to the communists. These honorable men were outraged that we stood idly by while the communists captured and executed our ally who "found Yugoslavia's soul" and raised the first rebellion against the Nazis in Europe. The Greatest Generation did speak out against the injustice done to Mihailovic and the Serbian nation, and the things they said are contained in the pages of this book.

“Because the book is out of print and the publisher went out of business more than 50 years ago copies of it are hard to come by, so I scanned my copy, and through the magic of the Internet you can download your own copy of the book in PDF format by right clicking this link and selecting "Save Target As" (please note file is 137 MB).

“P.S.: To all of the Albanians, Muslims, and Croats who have taken the time to write me e-mails over the years calling me a "Chetnik" I thank you for bestowing such an honorable title on me. The mere fact that you think calling someone a Chetnik is an insult has done a tremendous amount to convince me of the rightness of the Serbian cause.”

Murdered for the Crime of Loyalty

Excerpt from the book’s Foreword

The disloyal will always hate the loyal. Drazha Mihailovich was arrested, tried, found guilty, sentenced to death and executed for the crime of loyalty, as were so many of his faithful companions and followers:

Damnatos fidei crimine, gravissimo inter desciscentis.

He was the victim of an international conspiracy. Some of the conspirators, it is true, were not men of ill-will. But either they were ill-informed by unworthy counsellors (as events have shown), or they were of narrow or confused understanding — men such as are easily misled by those of stronger and evil purpose.

At the heart of the conspiracy there was a malignant hatred — hatred of all the Western Powers fought for in the First and Second World Wars, hatred of honour, truth, freedom, and, therefore, of loyalty [...]

A Life-Long Soldier, War Veteran, Decorated Hero and Serbian Army General Wrote a Book on Guerrilla Warfare

Excerpts from the Introduction

Drazha Mihailovich was born in 1893 in the small town of Ivanyitza near Chachak, where his father was a schoolmaster. In 1910 Mihailovich entered the Military Academy, but his studies were interrupted in 1912 when he took part in the Serbo-Turkish War as a Cadet-Corporal. Twice decorated for his acts of bravery, he was promoted to Cadet-Sergeant and later to Second-Lieutenant in the Serbo-Bulgarian War, and participated in all operations.

When the First World War broke out in 1914, Mihailovich served with his regiment and was decorated several times. He particularly distinguished himself in an action in September, 1918 near Shtip and was promoted to First-Lieutenant and decorated with the White Eagle.

After the armistice, Mihailovich resumed his military studies. In 1929 he took a six months’ course in the French Army. Promoted to Staff Officer, then professor of tactics at the Higher College of the Military Academy, he was appointed Military Atache first in Sofia and subsequently in Prague.

On the eve of the present war, Mihailovich submitted a report to the Yugoslav General Staff in which he forecast almost everything that took place in April, 1941. He was of the opinion that the idea of defending practically indefensible Northern frontiers should be abandoned and proposed concentrating all forces in mountainous regions where the overwhelming superiority of the German tanks would be ineffectual. He wrote a book on guerrilla warfare which secured him a considerable following.

“I Don’t Know What Capitulation Means”

At the time that war broke out Colonel Mihailovich was Chief of Staff of a motorised division in Doboy, a small town in Bosnia. When capitulation was ordered by General Simovich without the knowledge of the Yugoslav Government, he refused to accept it and resolved to try to break through with chosen troops in the direction of Eastern Bosnia and Serbia, where he hoped to find an established front, and to join up with the regular army. On the way there he and his men were attacked by strong German formations, which, after fierce fighting, routed the troops; the commander of the small tank formation was taken prisoner, while Mihailovich was forced to withdraw into the hills.

Asked whether he had heard anything about the capitulation, Mihailovich answered:

“Capitulation? I do not know what capitulation is. I have served in the army for many years, but I have never heard this word.”

Colonel Mihailovich arrived at Ravna Gora on May 8th, 1941, and there the first guerrilla force was organised, not only the first in Yugoslavia, but the first in Europe; and for the first time on record in the countries of enslaved Europe a new way of opposing the conqueror was brought into effect.

General Mihailovic’s Condition for Peace: Fascist Invaders Must Evacuate My Country

Mihailovich was appointed Major-General on December 9th, 1941; Minister of War on January 11th, 1942; and Lieutenant-General on January 19th, 1942. Finally on June 17th, 1942 he was appointed General and Deputy Commander-in-Chief.

Germany became alarmed. General Dankelmann, Military Governor of Serbia, asked for reinforcements; but the German Army was too deeply involved in Russia, and it was impossible to deplete the Russian front. The German General attempted to arrange an armistice with Mihailovich, but the latter laid down certain conditions. He agreed to receive the German envoys, nevertheless his terms proved unacceptable to the Germans.

“I demand,” he said, “that the German troops evacuate my country and then peace will be restored. As long as a single enemy soldier remains on our soil we shall continue to fight.”

Third Reich offers reward for capture of General Mihailovic
Third Reich offers reward for capture of General Draza Mihailovic: 100,000 Reich Marks in gold, dead or alive. The wanted ad, written in Serbian Cyrillic, was signed by the “Commander-in-Chief of the German Troops in Serbia.”

As then, so today: Fourth Reich, with its NATO military force and puppet regimes offers reward for the head of another Serbian General, who fought against Islamic dictatorship in Bosnia.

Throughout Yugoslavia Miahilovich and his men were concealed everywhere: in the hollow recesses of the plains of the Srem and Bachka regions, in the mountains of Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, amid the granite boulders of Montenegro; some were found scattered in villages which had been razed to the ground; others lurked behind the rocks of the Southern Adriatic coast; while sometimes they lived underground, hidden in secret munition dumps and caves. They lay in ambush in the ruins of bombed houses from which they would suddenly dart out and wreak vengeance on the enemy, whether German, Bulgar, Hungarian, Italian or Albanian who all collaborated in the occupation of Yugoslavia. Mihailovich’s men hovered like vultures over enemy camps ever ready to pounce upon their prey.

German Barbarism: 50 to 100 Innocent Serbian Civilians for One Killed or Missing Wehrmacht Soldier

Whereas the Germans succeeded in recruiting legionaries and volunteers for service with Wehrmacht amongst almost every conquered and satellite people in the world, yet the Serbs and the Poles never contributed a single military unit in support of the enemy.

The Germans would no longer tolerate this kind of resistance. They sent their well-known Strafexpeditionen, and the fight began again. The reprisals were appalling. They will remain for all time a symbol of German barbarism, for the Germans killed for the sake of killing.

On January 19th, 1943, a new proclamation from General Bader the Commander of the German Forces, was issued against General Mihailovich.

“A group of rebels, under the leadership of the former Colonel Drazha Mihailovich, is continuing to fight,” said General Bader. “These rebels give themselves out to be the regular Yugoslav Army and they are endeavouring to prolong the war, which was brought to a conclusion by the armistice that has been duly signed...”

Third Reich Offers 100,000 Gold Marks for General Mihailovich, Dead or Alive

Warfare went on unabated and General Mihailovich sent the following message to General Bader:

“A year and half has elapsed since I undertook this life-and-death struggle to exterminate the invaders on Yugoslav soil... Our fighting spirit is based on our traditional love of liberty and on our unflinching faith in the victory of our Allies... For every German soldier killed or missing, you ordered the shooting of 50 to 100 innocent and defenseless Serbian people. I wish to draw attention to the fact that the day of judgment is not far off. I warn you that if you continue to use savage reprisals I will use the same measures against German soldiers...”

On July 20th, 1943, the Axis-controlled Press published a proclamation offering a reward of 100,000 gold marks for the capture of Mihailovich, dead or alive. His men were being killed, seized or arrested. His followers were being questioned, tortured and imprisoned; they were also being sent to work in the mines. In spite of the extremely precarious situation, in spite of German reprisals, in spite of lack of arms and ammunition, General Mihailovich continued to exert his organized military resistance.

For military intervention supporting the Allied cause, especially at the most critical moment when Rommel’s Afrikakorps stood before El-Alamein, General Mihailovich received congratulations and thanks from the Allied Commanders. General Eisenhower, General Auchinleck, Air-Marshal Tedder, Admiral Harwood and General de Gaulle emphasized the importance of his help.

Once again the Yugoslav David defied a Goliath; and this time successfully. We owe that military success to the Yugoslav people and their leader, Mihailovich.

Allied Forces Betrayal

After the Tehran Conference, General Mihailovich was sacrificed for reasons of high political expediency. In the Autumn of 1944, he was abandoned by the Great Allies and as his attempts at co-operation with the advancing Red Army had been rejected, General Mihailovich demobilized the greater part of his forces.

In September, 1944, when his position was becoming precarious, the Americans offered to get him out of the country. General Mihailovich replied:

“I must stay with my people. My strength is in the people.”

And he stayed with his people.

The Red Army entered Belgrade on October 20th, 1944, to enthrone Tito, a Russian emissary, against the will of the great majority of the Yugoslav people. General Mihailovich remained with his people who guarded him and provided for his needs.

After five long years spent in the mountains the state of General Mihailovich’s health caused anxiety to those around him. He was begged to leave the country for a while. He categorically refused to consider taking such a step, and, in a letter—the last one written by him—he says:

“Under no conceivable circumstances will I leave my country and my people... The Communists are devoting all their efforts to capture me... On several occasions I have been in desperate straits... You know my strategic purpose—to maintain myself at all costs for the great task which lies ahead. It may be that I shall fall in our sacred cause. But you all know well that this would not mean that the righteous cause for which our nation is fighting would fall with me...”

“...The Gales of the World Have Carried Away Both Me and My Work”

Chicha Draza
General Mihailovic towards the end of the WWII. Serbian Chetniks under his command saved the lives of more than 500 American pilots whose planes were downed over German-occupied Serbia, at enormous risk and price in lives of the Serbs. Even today, General Mihailovic is called “Cica Draza” (Chi-chah, Uncle Draza) by the Serbs, out of love, respect and gratitude for his life-long sacrifice.

General Mihailovich fell seventeen months after the so-called “liberation” of Yugoslavia. Reports from Belgrade on March 24th, 1946, announced his capture under puzzling circumstances on March 13th, 1946. His trial before a Communist military court began on June 10th, 1946. He was “sentenced” to death on July 15th, 1946, and murdered on July 17th, 1946.

General Mihailovich is no more. He has departed this world convinced that he was abandoned by the Allies. The voices that were raised abroad in his defence were not allowed to reach him and he died without the satisfaction of knowing that in the opinion of many he died an innocent man and a great soldier.

General Mihailovich is no more, but the legends of his heroic deeds are becoming more and more popular and they live in the hearts of the people.

General Mihailovich is no more. He has departed this world. Those who have murdered him have not only perpetrated a crime, they have also committed a grave mistake, for democratic public opinion is well aware of General Mihailovich’s merits.

General Mihailovich is no more. The last words of this great patriot were concise and poignant. He said:

“I strove for much, I undertook much, but the gales of the world have carried away both me and my work.”

Democracy Serbian General Fought for Installed Dictatorship that Murdered him

[...] Realizing his difficult position, General Mihailovich made the following statement in August, 1944:

“More than three years ago I took up arms to fight for Democracy against Dictatorship in the form of Nazism and Fascism. In fighting for this cause there were ten occasions on which I almost lost my life. If I must die in fighting against a new form of Dictatorship, I shall die bitter because I have been deserted by those who profess to believe in Democracy, but satisfied that I myself have fought bravely and honestly and have refused to compromise my cause.”

The aim of this book is to give our readers a picture of the case of General Mihailovich as seen in the light of the international Press; a true picture of the case of a brave man who fought for Democracy against Dictatorship and who, after Democracy had won, was murdered by the Dictatorship which had been set up in his country by the very Democracies whose Ally he was.

Let us hope that his sacrifice will not be in vain.

From the book about the shameful betrayal of General Draza Mihailovic

October 20, 2007

Kosovo Province Misery

Holy Trinity Cathedral in Kosovo destroyed
Special brand of multiculturalism, freedom and democracy UNMIK and NATO established in Serbian Kosovo province: Holy Trinity Cathedral in Djakovica, destroyed by Albanian Muslims after NATO occupied the province.

Democracy Albanian Way: Molotov Cocktail for Serbian Church

Tanjug reports an explosive device was thrown on Friday morning at the Church of St Nikola in Gnjilane, in southern Serbian province of Kosovo.

Albanian policeman told media that the device failed to explode and that, “besides the black traces on the church wall, there was no other damage.” So, it’s fine then. No big deal — move on, nothing to see here:

“On the ground was found one broken bottle with a fuse, as well as two empty beer bottles. No one was hurt and there is no greater material damage. An investigation is underway, but for the time being nobody has been taken into custody,” Hasani said.

Really?! How odd. After successfully tracking down and apprehending ZERO of Albanian perpetrators of violent ethnically-motivated crimes in Kosovo province during the past eight years, Albanian KLA police, the KFOR and the UN police failed to find and take into custody this one. Oh, well... can’t get them all...

Gnjilane Serbs said that not one, but three Molotov cocktails had been thrown on Friday in an attempt to set fire to the church and burn it to the ground, like the other 155 Serbian churches and monasteries in Kosovo province Albanians have successfully destroyed during the past 8 years.

Archpriest of the church in Gnilane Svetisav Trajkovic said that for Serbs in the municipality of Gnjilane this incident was very disturbing and that they took it as a message that they should move away.

“The attackers know very well that the church as an institution is the only one that has survived in the territory, and they also know that Serbian people are the most vulnerable on that issue,” he said.

PR Performance: Large Quantity of Weapons Seized

The KLA in Serbian province (dressed in police uniforms issued by the UN) seized Thursday from two houses in Kacanik a large quantity of arms and ammunition and arrested five persons in this connection.

Reported as “seized” are few trinkets, like a recoilless gun, several Gulinov and AK-47 rifles and machine guns, snipers, handguns, 1,339 bullets “and other military equipment.”

The five arrested persons (of no nationality) are being held in custody, at least for a day or two, when they’ll be allowed to stroll out of jail, like every Albanian criminal before them. The weapons cache is expected to be redistributed among the Albanian terrorists, or stashed in a cellar of another clan-brother, to be rediscovered and re-seized some time later, when they decide a bit more PR is needed. Most probably when another Serb gets gutted, or when another Serbian church is attacked.

Roughing up a Serb or Two to Release the Stress

Since it must be very painful for KLA disguised as policemen to even pretend to arrest any from their own tribe during these PR performances, they have to release the accumulated stress by roughing up any of the Serbs they can find in the vicinity. NATO (KFOR) joins in to help them.

RTS reports that, on Saturday morning, NATO troops and Albanian KLA “police” have arrested a young Serb, Nebojsa Jovanovic from Bresje, near Kosovo Polje. According to Nebojsa’s brother Aleksandar, NATO soldiers were searching their family house and yard during the entire night before the arrest. They found nothing, but arrested his brother nevertheless.

“All night long, with military spotlights and armed to their teeth, they were searching both our yard and the house. My brother was arrested, but I have no idea why,” said Aleksandar. He added that neither KFOR, nor anyone from police have informed him about the reasons for the search, but he assumes they were searching for weapons.

Two other members of Jovanovic family had to be taken to hospital after NATO/KLA night-long party in their house.

UNMIK Pen Pusher Continues to Sing Praises to Kosovo Thug-Haven While Awaiting a Better Job

And yet, if one were to read the latest report UN Colonial Governor Joachim Ruecker submitted to Ban Ki-moon about the situation in the southern Serbian province, one would have to conclude that terrorist/mafia-run Kosovo is a multicultural heaven, making daily leaps towards an ideal society.

Belgrade daily Vecernje Novosti cites some of the remarks Serbian officials have submitted to the UN Secretary General regarding Ruecker’s latest ode to lawlessness under his rule.

“Report by the UN Secretary General’s special representative in Kosovo-Metohija is far from being objective and balanced, which is especially problematic at the time when negotiations are underway. The assessment that the UNMIK (United Nations Mission in Kosovo) has done everything it could to fulfill the Resolution 1244 is unacceptable and unjustified,” reads one of the remarks of Republic of Serbia about Ruecker’s report.

Serbian evaluation, read by the Novosti reporter, emphasized that Ruecker’s lament over the “disappointment” of Kosovo Albanian separatists with the “prolonged negotiating process and failure to approve a new Security Council resolution” which would separate Kosovo province from Serbia, is particularly intolerable and damaging to the process of negotiations.

They’ll Be Wonderful Once They Get Independence

Serbia has dismissed as entirely baseless Ruecker’s opinion that the provisional self-government in Serbian province has achieved progress in the implementation of standards, noting that Ruecker’s report leaves an impression that the only thing missing for the province to become comparable to the civil, democratic European societies, is independence.

Commenting Ruecker’s view of the political situation in Kosovo-Metohija, Belgrade noted that Albanian politicians in the province are continuing to talk about independence as the only solution.

“It’s been said that the local elections could be postponed if they were perceived as delay of the final status solution. This only means that the Albanian negotiating team is highly motivated to refrain from engaging in the search for a compromise, which directly destroys all attempts to create a constructive atmosphere during negotiations.”

Responding to Ruecker’s speculations about the Serbs’ position regarding local (UNMIK-staged) elections, Belgrade explained why the Serbs will not take part in these elections.

“Serbian voting in the 2001 and 2004 was rendered meaningless through the behavior of Albanians. At the same time, nothing has been done to enable the return of the refugees. There are no political or security conditions for Serbs to take part in these elections. The election atmosphere is additionally burdened with violent threats of the armed Albanian gangs. This is why Serbian government has recommended that Kosovo Serbs should not take part in the elections.”

All the Great Things UNMIK and NATO Have Achieved in Kosovo Since 1999 Will be Lost if Albanian Separatists aren’t Given What they Want

Regarding UNMIK’s failure to enable the return of over 250,000 Kosovo refugees, Serbian officials commented: “Contrary to Ruecker’s report, the problem is not Serbian ‘perception’ of the lack of safety. There are indeed very real and objective problems everyone who wishes to return to Kosovo-Metohija is confronted with. The return of Serbian Kosovo refugees is one of the main standards according to which UNMIK efficiency and ability to [re]create a multiethnic society in the province is measured.”

Most illustrative of the overall tone of German administrator’s report and of his considerable anti-Serbian bias is the following comment by the Serbian officials:

“The report makes every effort to treat Kosovo-Metohija as a territory outside of Serbian state. The author of the report continues to advocate Ahtisaari plan even though it was rejected by the UN Security Council, and without taking into account the fact that Serbia has rejected Ahtisaari proposal on the grounds that it violates the main precepts of the UN Charter.

“Ruecker’s conclusion that further prolonging of the decision about Kosovo status will jeopardize the ‘UN achievements in Kosovo since 1999’ is absolutely unacceptable. It is also damaging to the negotiating process. There is a need for political will on behalf of both sides in the negotiations in order to reach a compromise solution, along with refraining from imposing the artificial deadlines. In order for such a solution to be given legitimacy, it has to be approved by the UN Security Council. That is the approach that should be supported both by the United Nations and other international bodies.”

October 19, 2007

Book by Christopher Deliso

Book by Christopher Deliso

The Coming Balkan Caliphate: The Threat of Radical Islam to Europe and the West

Book by Christopher Deliso, American veteran field reporter and one of the foremost experts on the Balkans, director of Balkanalysis.com. Praeger Security International General Interest, 240pp, ISBN 0275995259. Buy this book at Amazon

Book Description

With all eyes currently focused on the widening conflict in the Middle East and the terrorist threat coming from the region, the West is in danger of overlooking a potent new battleground in the greater "war on terror"--the Balkans. This historically volatile region saw some of the worst violence of the late 20th century in the Yugoslav Wars of Secession. During these conflicts, stunningly shortsighted and politically motivated policies of the United States and its allies directly allowed Islamic mujahedin and terrorist-related entities to establish a foothold in the region--just as with the progenitors of the Taliban a decade earlier in Afghanistan.

Although the 9/11 attacks caused a partial reassessment of Western policy, it may already be too late for a region still largely ignored. The proliferation of foreign fundamentalist groups has had a cancerous effect on traditional Balkan Islamic communities, challenging their legitimacy in unprecedented and often violent ways.

Well-funded groups like the Saudi-backed Wahabbis continue to exploit internal schisms within local communities, while the international administrations in Bosnia and Kosovo have actually strengthened the grip of local mafia groups--business partners of terrorists.

Worst of all, the Western peacekeepers' chronic "don't rock the boat" mentality has allowed extremist groups to operate unchallenged. Nevertheless, regional demographic and cultural trends, coinciding with an increasingly hostile attitude in the larger Muslim world over Western military actions and perceived symbolic provocations, indicate that the lawless Balkans will become increasingly valuable as a strategic base for Islamic radicals over the next two decades.

Utilizing the post-al-Qaeda tactics of a decentralized jihad carried out through small, independent cells ("leaderless resistance") while seeking to fundamentally and violently remold Muslim societies, such Balkan-based extremists pose a unique and tangible threat to Western security.

Chapter-to-Chapter Walkthrough, in Author’s Own Words

[...] Chapter 1 examines the role of Bosnia in international terrorism, both the recent history and some of the warning signs now occurring, which indicate the significant threat from this country for the future. To some extent this is an old story, one which has received tremendous media attention ever since the Bosnian War in the 1990’s. It is certainly the single most important event for the arrival of foreign Islamic mujahedin, and Arab-style Islam, neither of which had any previous place in the country.

Clinton Administration Allows Iran, Saudi Arabia and Sudan to Import and Arm Mujahedins Against Bosnian Serbs

What happened was in 1991, 1992 and later the Clinton administration was determined to support the side of the Bosnian Muslim government against the Bosnian Serbs, thus picking one side in a very complex civil war. To do so, they had to go around the UN arms embargo on the various parties, however, and so Clinton decided to allow Iran, Saudi Arabia and Sudan, which was then hosting Osama bin Laden, to import and arm thousands of mujahedin fighters, many of them veterans from the jihad against the Russians in Afghanistan, which the US had of course supported also. According to the sources I cite, the decision to allow the mujahedin in was made at the highest levels, the idea being hatched between Bill Clinton and then-National Security Advisor Anthony Lake. The CIA, Pentagon and others allegedly didn’t even know about it in the beginning. Key players in facilitating the movement and equipping of the mujahedin were the intelligence services of allies like Croatia, Germany and Austria.

The American decision to use the mujahedin to surreptitiously fight the Serbs was a classic case of short-sighted policy planning. These fighters were all supposed to have left with the signing of the Dayton Agreement peace treaty in 1995, and the Iranian terrorist training camps shut down. Many did leave. However, many others didn’t, marrying local women and setting up shop in villages that became extremely conservative Muslim. You may have heard in the past year about the attempts of the Bush Administration to pressure the Bosnian Muslim government to get rid of the last of these people, and the resistance they have faced. One of the interesting things that has happened in this time has been the disappearance of former mujahedin who have gone ‘underground’ in the Balkans, according to regional intelligence sources to places like Sandzak in Serbia, Albania and Kosovo, or even further to Turkey and Chechnya. What is interesting to note is that the spread of radical Islamist groups in the Balkans has created a network of ‘safe houses’ and underground channels by which wanted terrorists or extremists are being circulated.

Connections Between Bosnian Mujadedins and Major Terrorist Attacks in the West Covered Up

Since the Clinton administration, and a good section of the media that supported it, was so heavily in favor of the Muslim side during the fighting in Bosnia, it’s no surprise that the direct connections between Bosnia and major terrorist attacks, including 9/11, has been underreported. The arrival of mujahedin fighters in Bosnia in the early 1990’s involved the installment of various networks – financial, charities and other NGOs – in Western European countries as well as in Bosnia itself. These organizations, some of which were destroyed after 2001, but not all, allowed terrorists more options for ‘cover’ and have provided sources of religious propaganda and publishing that are currently a major source for Wahhabi organizations’ propaganda material in the Balkans.

You may have heard of the arrest, a few days ago, of two Bosnians planning to bomb the US Embassy in Vienna. There have been other plots involving Bosnians thwarted in the last couple years as well. These sort of things could not have happened without, first and foremost, the Clinton administration’s giving the green light for the Saudi-Iranian mujahedin importing adventure in Bosnia.

Albania Becomes U.S. Ally and the Radical Islamic Nest at the Same Time

[...] Chapter 2 discusses the recent past of Albania, mainly the exploits of various Islamic radicals and groups like Egyptian Islamic Jihad in the 1990s. However, I also argue that while those actors have left the stage, the danger in Albania is by no means over- actually, it has changed shape, as I explain in my book.

Basically, what happened? In 1990, Albania was emerging from Communism after the death of dictator Enver Hoxha five years before. The US was naturally very eager to bring it out of Communism and nurture the ‘pro-democratic’ political elements. This involved supporting the campaign of Sali Berisha of the Democratic Party, and even parading him around America at events with William Ryerson, who would become the first American ambassador to Albania since the Communists took over after Berisha won, and who is now an Albanian lobbyist.

Berisha, who is again in power right now, was a classic opportunist, presiding over a very poor country that obviously needed all the help it could get. He got aid from the West, the US, the EU and NATO, but also from the Islamic world. In fact, under his initiative Albania even joined the Organization of Islamic Conferences (OIC), the only country in Europe to have done so, and without parliamentary approval. Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and other countries started making major investments, setting up banks, etc, but also building hundreds of mosques and inviting Albanian students to study Islamic theology in their countries.

At the same time, the US was training the Albanian secret service, the SHIK, which was headed by a hardcore Islamist, Bashkim Gazidede, who had been the president of an Islamic group in Tirana previously. Gazidede was very sympathetic to the Islamist cause and under his tenure extremist and terrorist groups related to bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri were allowed to enter Albania and flourish. So at the same time the CIA was training its Albanian colleagues and modernizing their service, it was also allowing anti-American forces to set up shop. Because of Albania’s lawlessness and poverty, the jihadists, many of whom were on the run from authorities in countries like Egypt, considered the country a ‘safe hotel’ where they could plot undisturbed. The CIA actually ordered various operations against these characters, but it was somewhat self-defeating, since important figures in the Albanian leadership were supporting the same people the US was trying to take action against.

On this note it’s interesting to point out that, though the Bush administration is frequently accused of being the creator of the ‘rendition’ program by which terrorists suspects are kidnapped and flown off to undisclosed locations where they are interrogated and sometimes tortured, this program was actually pioneered in Albania in the mid-1990’s. And maybe you recall Abu Omar, the unfortunate Muslim cleric kidnapped by the CIA off of a Milan street in 2004. He had actually been part of these Islamic groups in Albania during the period when that program was being set up.

Kosovo: Long and Sordid Story of Western Incompetence, Corruption and Terrorist-Appeasement

Chapter 3 takes a look at the unfolding situation in Kosovo, especially since the UN began its peacekeeping mission there in July 1999. This is a long and sordid story of incompetence, corruption and a blind policy where nobody from the side of the UN officials wanted to ‘rock the boat’ by speaking about terrorist groups in the province, as this was not in the interest of people there solely to benefit their diplomatic careers and get promoted to nicer places than Kosovo.

Although the Albanian Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) tried to distance itself from them, foreign mujahedin did manage to join their fight against the Serbs, as numerous eyewitness sources from the time attest. But the more serious problem was after the war, when Arab charities arrived and starting establishing the ultra-conservative Saudi Wahhabi form of Islam, which was very much against the traditional style of more moderate Islam inherited from the Ottoman Turks. Although a majority of local Albanians were not interested in them, the Saudis flooded the province with cash, to build mosques and to subsidize the building of Wahhabi mosques. In this pursuit, they destroyed centuries-old Ottoman structures and cemeteries because they supposedly represented idolatry and generally a non-correct interpretation of Islam.

In Kosovo no one knew what was going on with these groups, charities and cultural organizations mostly. The Saudi and other Arab charities did not communicate, or attend the regular meetings of international organizations that were held every week or month in this very multinational mission. In fact, not even the ‘pro-American’ Arab governments knew what was going on. They were the ones whom the US was at first relying on to get information. For example, in 2003, staunch us ally Jordan had to resort to intimidating its own citizens to get agents who could provide information on the Wahhabis to pass on to their American friends, however, these attempts were by and large not successful and resulted in the passage of disinformation purported to be intelligence, because the Wahhabi groups were so secretive. It was just too hard. This shows the extent of the inability to penetrate these cautious and well funded Saudi groups. Worst of all, as we will discuss later, when there were leads or investigations into radical groups by committed international officials, they were routinely quashed by higher-ups for political reasons.

Wahhabi Brand of Islam Tightening Grip on Serbian Kosovo Province

Today, while it’s by no means appealing to a majority of Albanians, Wahhabi Islam is increasing its grip on Kosovo, especially in the rural areas that have been by and large neglected by international donors, where the Islamic banking system and loans from Arab countries to local businessmen have been pioneered. Some of these areas were also hotbeds of nationalism and centers of the KLA uprising in 1999. Cleverly, the Saudis foresee that nationalist extremism can be re-channelled into religious extremism eventually, and certainly the resolution of the ‘Albanian question’ with the independence of Kosovo will diminish ethnic nationalism. There have already been warning signs, in the form of sectarian threats and even murders, that point to a coming clash between Albanian Muslims and Catholics in Kosovo, just as in Albania.

Radical Albanian Imams in Kosovo Knew Upfront About 9/11 Attack on United States

Part of what I do in The Coming Balkan Caliphate is to bring previously unknown details to the surface. One of the most explosive and mysterious of these relates to Kosovo, where in August of 2001 several Albanian-American radical imams were touring the villages, preaching against America and stating that America would soon be attacked. My book cites a security official present at the meeting discussing this in mid-September of that year. Apparently the men were connected to a wealthy mafia figure in Albanian-populated South Mitrovica. They were detained by UN police, however, they were soon inexplicably released. This detail revealing the apparent foreknowledge of several Albanian American radicals about the 9/11 attacks is something which has never been reported before.

Wahhabi Islam Spills Over Into FYR of Macedonia

Chapter 4 discusses the curious case of Wahhabi Islam in the (former Yugoslav) Republic of Macedonia, and the existence of several groups there that were of interest to the military intelligence services of Italy and France, among others, but have never before been reported in the media. This is a very interesting case because it is so unknown. The existence of a small number of radicals, and groups such as the Pakistani Tablighi Jamaat, among the minority Slavic Torbeshi Muslims comes as a surprise to not only foreigners but also locals. Such groups and their connections between diaspora Muslims from the country and Wahhabi groups in places like Italy and Austria, where they work, was closely watched by the foreign services and even manifested in a few detentions in the Trieste area last year, during an investigation of al Qaeda-linked networks in northern Italy.

What has been more in the news here were the goings-on within the Islamic Community in Skopje, which passed through a turbulent period from about 1999-2005, when the leadership of the community was taken over by violent Wahhabi sympathizers. Although the unrest seems to be over, and the ‘moderates’ restored to power, the Wahhabis remain and in fact have their people inserted at various levels in the IC administration and in the mosques. Western counterterrorism officials also have played close attention to the growth of Wahhabi groups in Skopje and other cities with Albanian population such as Tetovo.

Ottoman Legacy and the Role of Present Turkish Governments

Chapter 5 talks about the Ottoman Turkish legacy in the Balkans, with a bit of info on radical Islamic trends in the Slavic Muslim Pomak and Turkish communities in Bulgaria. Most of this chapter is devoted, however, to the considerable role of the Turkish government in the international heroin trade from Afghanistan and the Turkish government’s creation of an Islamic group, the Turkish Hezbollah, as a proxy army against the Kurdish PKK, according to the model of America’s brilliant idea to create bin Laden and the Afghan mujahedin to fight the Russians. Eventually, the Turkish Hezbollah grew out of control and threatened state interests, and so had to be liquidated. Ironically, today some of these former fighters who left when the group was destroyed are today in Iran and Iraq, fighting American soldiers there.

An interesting dimension of this chapter is the implications of the Turkish Ottoman legacy for the future of the Balkans- a very big question. For some Muslims among the Albanian, Turkish Bosnian and other Slavic Muslim communities, the Ottoman days represent some sort of golden age, the natural order of civilization in the Balkans. For the majority Balkan Christians, however, the Ottoman occupation was a very unfortunate and socially retarding aberration from prior Byzantine Christian civilization. The ramifications of this differing view can be seen today in things like the denationalization process. After Communism, the various Balkan governments are supposed to give property back to prior owners, and a lot of properties were owned by the church or the Islamic authorities. Under the Ottomans, many churches were turned into mosques. Different claimants hold up different property documents, decrees from different historical rulers and justifications for why the property is ‘really’ theirs. The Islamic Community in Skopje, for example, considers itself entitled to half a billion dollars in property reparations.

This is clearly a big issue, and with the addition into the mix of Wahhabi groups, we have a fascinating situation going on. For example, in Struga, on Lake Ohrid, a large Wahhabi mosque has been built over a former Ottoman one, which itself was built over a Byzantine church. Which, if any, is ‘appropriate’ for the country? The answer to questions like this will be increasingly contentious in the future.

“Don’t Rock the Boat” Attitude of the Internationals in Kosovo Province

Chapter 6 of The Coming Balkan Caliphate is perhaps my favorite. It describes, based on numerous interviews on and off the record with various security officials from the UN mission, OSCE, European intelligence experts, the CIA, MI6, etc, the reason for the intelligence failures that have led to the present poor situation, especially in Kosovo. This chapter indicates both the lack of intelligence sharing and the outcomes of the failed execution of counterterrorism work in Kosovo, and how this has aided the rise of fundamentalist Islam there. It has been a classic case of ‘don’t rock the boat, nothing to see here.’ People motivated more by career aspirations than by a search for terrorists. We will talk about this more soon.

U.S. Government Infiltrated with Foreign Spies

Chapter 7 is in some respects the most searching of chapters. It talks about the complex and weighty issues of the nexus between high political figures and decision-making, high-level corruption and the economics of terrorism. With testimony from individuals like former FBI translator and whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, it reveals, in more detail than previously known, how the US government has been infiltrated with foreign spies, especially in the State Department, the Pentagon, the nuclear laboratories, in the process compromising the security of the US and the world. It is a sordid story of how everything is for sale to the highest bidder, from military technology to nuclear secrets.

Role of Technology in Terrorist Attacks

Finally, chapter 8 discusses emerging threats- the changing shape of jihad and jihadist groups, and the role of technology in future terrorist attacks. Maybe some of you saw the recent CNN special on how a hacking attack could shut down power supply stations with devastating and chaotic effects. Through testimony from technology industry experts I describe the precise scenarios by which such attacks could be carried out.

Most specifically, along these lines in the Balkans, the chapter provides an assessment of uses of technology by existing Islamist groups in the Balkans, both as a means of communication, information dissemination and contact with foreign Islamists, and as an organizing tool for attacks that have so far luckily been stopped in time. I lay out specific scenarios by which terrorists in Albania, Kosovo, Bosnia or in fact anywhere could disrupt global transport, communication and financial services virtually, from afar. I also discuss the growing role of the so-called ‘white devils,’ European converts and white-skinned Balkan Muslims, who can evade more easily the Western countries’ policy of racial profiling, which sad to say is the system they tend to follow.

In Kosovo War Blair’s Britain Encouraged UK-Based Jihadis to Join Albanians Against Serbs

So those are the chapters and what they cover. Now, most fundamentally, let’s ask, what have the problems in counterterrorism efforts been? I argue that these are flaws of both policy and execution. First, the flawed policy of the Clinton administration allowed thousands of mujahedin into Bosnia and thus Western Europe. This is to some extent ancient history, though the links between Bosnia-based terrorists and the 9/11 attacks, the attacks in Madrid and the failed attack on the funeral of Pope John Paul II indicate the folly of this policy. And in places like Albania during the first Berisha government, the US was supporting the very people flooding the country with suspected terrorists. In the Kosovo war, Britain encouraged jihadis from its own Muslim population to join the fight on the Albanian side. So clearly this short-sighted policy is to blame first and foremost, because without it the non-traditional foreign Islamists would not have been able to entrench themselves.

UN Mission in Kosovo Sweeps Bad News Under the Rug for Eight Years

As for the second problem, execution, the best example here that we can single out has been the UN mission in Kosovo. Interviews with numerous security officials keep coming back to the same problem: there was little or no action against extremist groups for political reasons. All the international officials wanted to say everything was OK, to sweep any bad news under the rug, so that they could get positive reports from higher-ups and move onwards and upwards with their careers in places better than Kosovo. Even when presented with concrete information, such as photos and police reports indicating the presence of groups like the Kuwaiti RIHS, Revival of Islamic Heritage Society, the international security bosses were not very interested. This is a group that has been blacklisted by the Bush administration in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan for links with al Qaeda, a group involved with 500 simultaneous bombings in Bangladesh on August 18, 2005. Yet they were allowed to flourish in Kosovo.

Sluggishness, Careerism and Withholding Intelligence Helped Create Kosovo Hellhole

Besides sluggishness and careerism, another problem with execution is structural. By this I mean the proliferation of so many different security agencies within countries- say in Germany, you have the intelligence, the military intelligence, the police, justice and so on. And each country in Europe has a similar number, all with their own rivalries and agendas, and all withholding information from one another out of competitiveness.

Compounding this confusion, there are the EU agencies, and then those within the UN in Kosovo, within NATO, the OSCE, the Americans and so on. There are simply too many people involved and to many rivals withholding intelligence. The lack of ‘intelligence sharing’ has become sort of a cliché in official explanations in America of why 9/11 happened. It can’t be used to explain everything, but in a place like Kosovo, run by an unaccountable and amorphous international administration, the problem becomes really acute, as in the March 2004 riots, when the German BND intelligence service withheld vital information from the German military peacekeepers. In short, they knew from their surveillance that the riots would happen, and they didn’t share this information, meaning the military was taken by surprise and couldn’t protect the Serbs from the rioting Albanians.

Of course, the US has taken steps to ameliorate the problem in general with the establishment of the DHS, and I suspect Greece is going to go the same way. However, despite this recent experiment, the same problems still remain and it is unclear whether it will ever improve. The terrorists, on the other hand, have no institutional limitations, greater secrecy, a lighter and more flexibility organization structure, and so on. The current situation is like trying to break water with a rock. It is a very difficult situation.

Disastrous Clinton Policy Has Not Changed

Unfortunately, it seems that the disastrous policy inherited from the Clinton administration has not changed. The US seeks to make an independent Kosovo for the Albanians, something which is rightly perceived by several European countries, including Greece, as a threat to Balkan stability. One of the problems in uniting a country and preparing it for independence has been the factionalism of Albanian clan chiefs and rival political leaders, all of whom have their own individual intelligence services. The quest to unify these mutually mistrustful intelligence bodies by the US and Britain was reported a couple of years ago, I think, by Jane’s Intelligence Digest. Most recently, and this was not reported, one month ago in Tirana, the CIA held special meetings with the Kosovo Albanian leaders in an attempt to unify their services, as is seen as a prerequisite to having a modern state.

This brings us to an interesting point in terms of execution. The US has ended up having to rely for information on Islamist groups from these mafia-connected and paramilitary controlling Albanian clan leaders. The latter promise hot information and use this as a point of leverage and to win favor with the Americans, however most of the time it is just disinformation that they’re providing, as testimony from international security officials in Kosovo reveals.

The reason the US has found itself in this unenviable position, according to currently serving counter-terrorism officials and military personnel, is because due to shipping out its best assets to places like Iraq and Afghanistan, it has essentially ‘farmed out’ its intelligence-gathering operations in Kosovo to Romanian and Ukrainian underlings in the NATO mission there. As all of you know, these Christian countries are perceived as sympathetic to the Serbs, and so are disliked by the Albanians. Thus they are in no position to get useful information. Worse, on February 10, 2007, two Albanian protestors were shot dead by UN police firing rubber bullets at a crowd of demonstrators. The police were Romanian, and this effectively ended whatever effect these people could have had for US efforts. Indeed, as a Kosovo Serbian resident added afterwards, ‘now, you can’t find a Romanian living outside of Gracanica’, the main Serbian enclave in central Kosovo.

Bound to Get Worse if Hilary Clinton Gets Elected

So it seems the disastrous policies that led us to this stage remain, and will continue to remain. Now I don’t want to dwell on politics too much, but considering that the Balkan interventions were undertaken aggressively by the previous Clinton administration, I fear that it will only get worse if Hilary Clinton is elected president. Most of the people around her who are likely to crawl out of the woodwork and take up positions of power, like Richard Holbrooke, Wesley Clark, Madeleine Albright and their assistants have direct responsibility for the failed policies that have created such a dangerous situation today. They are certainly not going to acknowledge or apologize for this, of course [...]

Entire article »

October 18, 2007

Balkans’ Secessionist Bug Spreading Like Wildfire