« Who Restarted the Cold War? | Main | Resolution 1244 and Dayton Accord »

Russian Warnings Over Serbian Kosovo Province

Putin explains map to Bush
In case Serbian Kosovo province is severed despite Serbia’s opposition and in violation of the UN Charter and UN SC Resolution 1244, Moscow will recognize Russian-majority regions on the territory of former Soviet Union as independent states.

Moscow Ready to Recognize Russian-Majority Regions in the Neighborhood as Independent States

Reuters reports about an unnamed Russian diplomat who “hinted” on Wednesday that Moscow would recognize the Russian-majority regions in the territory of former Soviet Union as independent states, in case West allows unilateral proclamation of independence by the Albanian separatists in southern Serbian province of Kosovo.

Many other Russian representatives, including Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and President Putin himself, have openly said that there would be nothing to prevent Russian Federation from recognizing independence of Russian-majority regions in the former Soviet Union in case West decides to impose dismemberment of Serbia, directly violating the UN Charter and UN Security Council Resolution 1244. But Reuters reporters might’ve missed those earlier “hints.”

At the same time, RTS carried the latest statements of two named high officials of Russian Federation.

Kosovo Can Never Become a UN Member

“The United Nations will never recognize the unilateral independence of Kosovo and Metohija,” said Russia’s Permanent EU Representative Vladimir Chizhov. He also did not exclude the possibility of extending the negotiating Troika’s mandate beyond December 10. In addition, the issue can be referred back to the Contact Group, or a new mediator can be appointed.

According to Chizhov, allowing the unilateral proclamation would represent “a blow to the UN authority, since United Nations have never recognized the unilaterally declared independence.”

“Russia will never allow this,” said Russian diplomat, as reported by the Itar-Tass agency from Brussels.

Chizhov added that “only viable is a solution reached through the negotiations” and warned that, in case of the unilateral proclamation of Kosovo independence, the states that recognize it will “make a strategic mistake of global proportions,” consequences of which will reverberate “not only in the Balkans, but throughout Europe and through all of the unrecognized territories.”

UN Security Council will Determine the Format of Belgrade-Pristina Dialog After December 10

Head of the Russian mission in Brussels noted that negotiations about the status of Serbian province mediated by the Contact Group Troika are going better than expected. “Certain success has already been achieved,” he said, adding that at the last meetings in Brussels and Vienna Serbs and Albanian separatists talked directly to each other, while earlier each side addressed the Troika only.

Ideally, Belgrade and Pristina should be able to continue the negotiations directly, without mediators, Chizhov said, adding that Moscow does not view December 10 as the day when Troika’s mandate ends, nor as the end of negotiations. At that time, Troika should submit its progress report to the UN Secretary General, based on which the Security Council will determine the format of the future dialog.

Vladimir Chizhov confirmed that the issue of Serbian Kosovo-Metohija province will be discussed during the upcoming Russia-EU Summit scheduled for October 26, in Portugal.

International Community Cannot be Blackmailed

Russia’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Vladimir Titov said that raising tensions over the date when mediating Troika is to submit its progress report to the UN Secretary General — December 10 — is “unjustified and largely counterproductive.” He warned that unilateral proclamation of Serbian province’s independence would have “an infectious” effect on all the other contested territories.

“No one has the right to blackmail the international community. There can be no unilateral actions and decisions,” Titov told Itar-Tass agency at the end of his Balkan tour. He added that development of the Kosovo province situation will determine the perspective of the entire Balkan peninsula.

According to the high Russian representative, Moscow holds that “the aspect of time cannot be decisive” for resolving the future of Serbian province.

Titov said that on December 10 Contact Group’s Troika is expected to submit its report to the UN Secretary General, who will then present it to the Security Council. “The UN Security Council will review the situation and determine future steps,” stressed Russian Deputy Foreign Minister.

Unilateral Moves would Infect Other Contested Regions

Summing up the result of his talks in Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia and Bulgaria, Titov said that the compromise solution, reached through negotiations, will bring peace to the Balkans and beyond.

He warned that the unilateral proclamation of independence would be “infectious for other contested regions,” not only on the territory of the former Soviet Union, but also in Europe.

According to Titov, Balkan is the region with great potentials, where the inter-ethnic conflicts are fading, but the main challenge is to resolve the situation in Kosovo-Metohija. “The perspective of entire Balkans depends on how this situation develops,” said Titov.

He stressed that all the Balkan states, including Albania with its specific position, agree that solution for the Serbian province should be reached through compromise, by peaceful means and through negotiations. That is the only kind of solution, said Titov, that would not cause any negative consequences in the region and beyond.

Comments

Svetlana...I don't understand the geopolitical implications of Moscow recognizing the independance of Russian-majority regions in former Soviet territory, in the event the West recognizes unilateral independence of Kosovo by Albaniac nutball separatists. Does Russia want to encourage independance of these regions? Would this not constitute some degree of "breakup" of Russia?? Is this not something that nutball Bush and his state dept toadies would welcome??

It would, if it meant regions in Russia itself. But this relates to the states that were formed on the territory of former Soviet Union apart from Russia - Gorgia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Moldova etc. All of them, especially Georgia and Ukraine, which NATO wants to enlist in their membership now, thus reaching to the very border of present-day Russia, have large populations of 100% Russians - people who consider Russia their motherland and want to secede from these new states, formed after the breakup of Soviet Union. Condoleezza Rice, petrified with Russia from her youth, and the rest of State Department certainly do not want that :-))

Although the Western mainstream media keeps blaming Russia for "supporting" these separatist regions in the states neighboring theirs, the truth is that Russia's UN Ambassador kept voting in the UN Security Council the same way American, British and other Western UN Ambassadors did: for preservation of Georgian territorial integrity and against secession of Abhkazia and South Ossetia, just as they have done in the case of Serbian Kosovo province. So, when Russians say they are defending the principle of territorial integrity, the UN Charter and the international laws, those words are solidly backed up with their actions in United Nations. Unlike you-know-whose...

But if the principle of territorial integrity gets trampled over in the case of Serbian state, if it's OK to forcibly change the borders of existing UN-member states for the sake of minorities, then there is really no reason for Russian Federation not to move to enlarge its own state by breaking off parts of neighboring states that want to secede and adjoining them to Russia. The same self-determination "principle" that would be backed up in case of Albanian minority in Serbia would apply to Russians in Georgia and Ukraine who do not want to live with Georgians and Ukrainians in the same state.

I get it Svetlana....many thanks.

I'm grateful that you asked about that part which was a bit murky in the entry, because I realize I wasn't clear to begin with. It's good to be given an opportunity to clarify some bits afterwards :-))

I couldn't help noticing the confused look on George Bush's face on the picture of Vladimir Putin pointing to a map of far East. George might have mistaken Korea for Florida and wondered why is Vladimir so familiar with the territory.

To Bozidar...Bush is obviously a horses ass but he probably does know Florida from Korea since his family owns a good sized piece of the former.

I have no doubt you are right joesixpack31, but knowing a territory physically is not quite the same as recognizing it on the map. Anyhow, my remark was metaphoric in nature since George does look puzzled in the picture.

To Bozidar...You're right.