« Bush to Greet Terrorist Thaci | Main | Serbian Traitors and Enemies' Gloating »

The New Hitler-Mufti Summit

The new Hitler-Mufti Summit
"...I said this is an historic moment, and indeed it is an historic moment", U.S. State Secretary Condoleezza Rice said, greeting KLA war criminal and terrorist Thaci in Washington.

How Far They've Fallen!

...Said Liz Milanovich, commenting today's meeting between the U.S. Republican President George W. Bush and Kosovo Albanian war criminal and mafia chieftain Hashim Thaci. Because, this is what the Republican Policy Committee had to say about the KLA terrorists a while back: The Kosovo Liberation Army: Does Clinton Policy Support Group with Terror, Drug Ties? From 'Terrorists' to 'Partners'

The KLA: from 'Terrorists' to 'Partners'

Excerpt from the United States Senate Republican Policy Committee Report, from March 31, 1999

[...] The Kosovo Liberation Army "began on the radical fringe of Kosovar Albanian politics, originally made up of diehard Marxist-Leninists (who were bankrolled in the old days by the Stalinist dictatorship next door in Albania) as well as by descendants of the fascist militias raised by the Italians in World War II" ["Fog of War -- Coping With the Truth About Friend and Foe: Victims Not Quite Innocent," New York Times, 3/28/99]. The KLA made its military debut in February 1996 with the bombing of several camps housing Serbian refugees from wars in Croatia and Bosnia [Jane's Intelligence Review, 10/1/96]. The KLA (again according to the highly regarded Jane's,) "does not take into consideration the political or economic importance of its victims, nor does it seem at all capable of seriously hurting its enemy, the Serbian police and army. Instead, the group has attacked Serbian police and civilians arbitrarily at their weakest points. It has not come close to challenging the region's balance of military power" [Jane's, 10/1/96].

The group expanded its operations with numerous attacks through 1996 but was given a major boost with the collapse into chaos of neighboring Albania in 1997, which afforded unlimited opportunities for the introduction of arms into Kosovo from adjoining areas of northern Albania, which are effectively out of the control of the Albanian government in Tirana. From its inception, the KLA has targeted not only Serbian security forces, who may be seen as legitimate targets for a guerrilla insurgency, but Serbian and Albanian civilians as well.

In view of such tactics, the Clinton Administration's then-special envoy for Kosovo, Robert Gelbard, had little difficulty in condemning the KLA (also known by its Albanian initials, UCK) in terms comparable to those he used for Serbian police repression:

" 'The violence we have seen growing is incredibly dangerous,' Gelbard said. He criticized violence 'promulgated by the (Serb) police' and condemned the actions of an ethnic Albanian underground group Kosovo Liberation Army (UCK) which has claimed responsibility for a series of attacks on Serb targets. 'We condemn very strongly terrorist actions in Kosovo. The UCK is, without any questions, a terrorist group,' Gelbard said." [Agence France Presse, 2/23/98]

Mr. Gelbard's remarks came just before a KLA attack on a Serbian police station led to a retaliation that left dozens of Albanians dead, leading in turn to a rapid escalation of the cycle of violence. Responding to criticism that his earlier remarks might have been seen as Washington's "green light" to Belgrade that a crack-down on the KLA would be acceptable, Mr. Gelbard offered to clarify to the House Committee on International Relations:

"Questioned by lawmakers today on whether he still considered the group a terrorist organization, Mr. Gelbard said that while it has committed 'terrorist acts,' it has 'not been classified legally by the U.S. Government as a terrorist organization.' " [New York Times, 3/13/98]

The situation in Kosovo has since been transformed: what were once sporadic cases of KLA attacks and often heavy-handed and indiscriminate Serbian responses has now become a full-scale guerrilla war. That development appeared to be a vindication of what may have been the KLA's strategy of escalating the level of violence to the point where outside intervention would become a distinct possibility. Given the military imbalance, there is reason to believe the KLA -- which is now calling for the introduction of NATO ground troops into Kosovo [Associated Press, 3/27/99] -- may have always expected to achieve its goals less because of the group's own prospects for military success than because of a hoped-for outside intervention: As one fighter put it, "We hope that NATO will intervene, like it did in Bosnia, to save us" ["Both Sides in the Kosovo Conflict Seem Determined to Ignore Reality," New York Times, 6/22/98].

By early 1999, the Clinton Administration had completely staked the success of its Kosovo policy on either the acceptance by both sides of a pre-drafted peace agreement that would entail a NATO ground occupation of Kosovo, or, if the Albanians signed the agreement while Belgrade refused, bombing of the Serbs. By committing itself so tightly to those two alternatives, the Clinton Administration left itself with as little flexibility as it had offered the Albanians and the Serbs.

At that point for the Administration, cultivating the goodwill of the KLA -- as the most extreme element on the Albanian side, and the element which had the weapons capable of sinking any diplomatic initiative -- became an absolute imperative:

"In order to get the Albanians'... acceptance [of the peace plan], Ms. Albright offered incentives intended to show that Washington is a friend of Kosovo...Officers in the Kosovo Liberation Army would . . . be sent to the United States for training in transforming themselves from a guerrilla group into a police force or a political entity, much like the African National Congress did in South Africa." [New York Times, 2/24/99]

The Times' comparison of treatment of the KLA with that of the African National Congress (ANC) -- a group with its own history of terror attacks on political opponents, including members of the ethnic group it claims to represent -- is a telling one. In fact, it points to the seemingly consistent Clinton policy of cultivating relationships with groups known for terrorist violence -- not only the ANC, but the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Irish Republican Army (IRA) -- in what may be a strategy of attempting to wean away a group from its penchant for violence by adopting its cause as an element of U.S. policy.

By the time the NATO airstrikes began, the Clinton Administration's partnership with the KLA was unambiguous:

"With ethnic Albanian Kosovars poised to sign a peace accord later Thursday, the United States is moving quickly to help transform the Kosovo Liberation Army from a rag-tag band of guerrilla fighters into a political force. . . . Washington clearly sees it as a main hope for the troubled province's future. 'We want to develop a good relationship with them as they transform themselves into a politically-oriented organization,' deputy State Department spokesman James Foley said. 'We want to develop closer and better ties with this organization.'

"A strong signal of this is the deference with which U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright treats the Kosovar Albanians' chief negotiator Hashim Thaci, a 30-year-old KLA commander. Albright dispatched her top aide and spokesman James Rubin to Paris earlier this week to meet with Thaci and personally deliver to him an invitation for members of his delegation to visit the United States. Rubin, who will attend the ceremony at which the Kosovar Albanians will sign the accord, is expected to then return to Washington with five members of the delegation, including Thaci. Thaci and Rubin have developed a 'good rapport' during the Kosovo crisis, according to U.S. officials who note that Thaci was the main delegate they convinced to sign the agreement even though the Serbs have refused to do so. [ . . . ]

" '[W]e believe that we have a lot of advice and a lot of help that we can provide to them if they become precisely the kind of political actor we would like to see them become.' Foley stressed that the KLA would not be allowed to continue as a military force but would have the chance to move forward in their quest for self government under a 'different context.' 'If we can help them and they want us to help them in that effort of transformation, I think it's nothing that anybody can argue with.' "

Such an effusive embrace by top Clinton Administration officials of an organization that only a year ago one of its own top officials labeled as "terrorist" is, to say the least, a startling development.

Even more importantly, the new Clinton/KLA partnership may obscure troubling allegations about the KLA that the Clinton Administration has thus far neglected to address.

Charges of Drugs, Islamic Terror -- and a Note on Sources

No observer doubts that the large majority of fighters that have flocked to the KLA during the past year or so (since it began large-scale military operations) are ordinary Kosovo Albanians who desire what they see as the liberation of their homeland from foreign rule. But that fact -- which amounts to a claim of innocence by association -- does not fully explain the KLA's uncertain origins, political program, sources of funding, or political alliances.

Among the most troubling aspects of the Clinton Administration's effective alliance with the KLA are numerous reports from reputable unofficial sources -- including the highly respected Jane's publications -- that the KLA is closely involved with:

* The extensive Albanian crime network that extends throughout Europe and into North America, including allegations that a major portion of the KLA finances are derived from that network, mainly proceeds from drug trafficking; and

* Terrorist organizations motivated by the ideology of radical Islam, including assets of Iran and of the notorious Osama bin-Ladin -- who has vowed a global terrorist war against Americans and American interests.

The final two sections of this paper give samples of these reports. (Many of these reports are available in full at www.siri-us.com, the website of an independent think tank called the Strategic Issues Research Institute of the United States, under "Background Issues".) In presenting samples of such reports for the consideration of Republican Senators and staff, RPC does not claim that these reports constitute conclusive evidence of the KLA's drug or terror ties. Nor are these reports necessarily conclusive as to the policy advisability of the Clinton Administration's support for that organization. They do, however, raise serious questions about the context in which decisions regarding American policy in the Balkans are being made by the Clinton Administration.

All of these sources are unclassified and unconnected to official agencies of the U.S. government, although some quote sources in intelligence agencies. Possible objections could be raised that the relevant U.S. government agencies may not have made available similar reports concerning the KLA. While it is not possible to discuss, in the context of this paper, what information is or is not available from classified sources, the author of this paper offers what he regards as two helpful observations. First, one should recognize that the absence of reporting on a given topic may indicate that the information has not been obtained, assembled, or disseminated by the agencies in question, but not necessarily that it does not exist. That is, silence by official sources does not constitute disproof of unofficial sources. The second and more troubling observation is that the Clinton Administration has demonstrated, to an unprecedented degree, an unfortunate tendency -- in some cases possibly involving an improper politicization of traditionally non-political government agencies -- to manage or conceal inconvenient information that might call into question some of its policies [...]


Clinton Administration this, Clinton Administration that, yadda, yadda, yadda... and here's the Bush Administration's record to date: backed, financed and recognized illegal unilateral declaration of independence by the very same leaders of the terrorist KLA in Serbian Kosovo-Metohija province. The Bush Administration has, in the meantime, taken lead in promoting Muslim terrorists in the Balkans, advocating the most retrograde, savage ethnic separatism and terrorism in Europe, fragmenting the Balkans further, all the way down to walled-off enclaves, creating ghettos and deepening the animosities to the point of no return, ensuring another century of bloodletting which is just waiting for the right moment to begin. Finally, today, Bush is to hug his best friend and partner, the first-rate butcher in Europe, Hashim Thaci. The Republicans have gone very far indeed.

Original photo from the SerbBlog (slightly enhanced for the current historic moment)

Comments

The history has turned full circle and Hitler's goals have become US goals. Next comes the defeat of the fascistic conquerors by the forces of peace and justice.

As I have mentioned in numerous article on my blog, there is virtually no difference between neoliberals and neoconservatives.

It should be remembered that the initial hand in rending apart Jugoslavija was that of J.H.W. Bush (Bush pere). It was the elder Bush who went along with the German demand to recognize Slovenija and Croatia as advanced at Maastricht. It was the elder Bush who's State Department popularized the concept of "ethnic cleansing" by the Serbs. The neo-liberal Clintoon (mal)administration simply followed in the footsteps of the "conservative" Bush I (mal)administration. Also, it should be remembered that one of the first and loudest enemies of the Serbs was Bob Dole. No difference, really.

If Radovan Karadjic is turned over to the kangaroo court in The Hague -while the killers of Serbs are continually being freed under various pretenses by that "court"- then, whoever turns him over needs to follow Zoran Djindjic to hell.

Reports have it Karadzic has been arrested and detained in Belgrade. Great work by the new Eu puppet and head of Serbian police Dacic. Dickheads send heroes to the devil's court they must be all drugged how can one even think of such a disgraceful action. The Serbs held out against a decade of sanctions lived like pigs to protect them then these blow ins go and sell them out. That certainly must be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Serbia needs to liquidate this leadership and install stubborn radicals to power then Serbia can awake and realize its destiny of unification.

WHAT they got Karadzic this is bull shit, who ever turned him in needs to be killed. Some media are reporting that Hague wants to kill Seselj cuz they can't prove he's guilty. I was planning on buying a home in Serbia but thia turn of events has got me thinking, as long as a majority of Serbs are brainwasked and want Serbia dead i will not invest my money into. Russia, India and China are the only path for Serbia.

'How far they have fallen'. Well put indeed.
Needs to be applied to many Serbs themselves.
I trust the voters for the traitorous Socialists are congratulating themselves today for a job well done.
The late President Milosevich must be spinning in his grave at such infamy by his party. You cannot blame the yellows - we all expected it of them. But the socialist leaders - they are the people...........who should pay! double, triple treason.
I agree with some of the radical comments above - absolutely.
Mladic next?? they would pay heavily for that one I think.

PS If the Socialists have any honour left - doubtful - they should immediately withdraw from the government and bring it down. Someone should be calling for this.

I don’t understand you people. Why all this surprise for the Socialists? One couldn’t possibly be more wrong calling this coalition unnatural. Let’s be real, DS and SPS are both branches of the Communist Party that split up in the early 90s, the DEMONcrats having descended from Ivan Stambolic and the Socialists founded by Milosevic. This is actually the first time that the political parties in Serbia are properly divided into their two camps, with the supposed non-communist, patriotic Radicals and DSS on one side and the leftist-liberal-commies of SPS, DS, Gej-17 Plus, SPO and LDP on the other. Consider this plus the fact that DS and SPS are affiliated with the Party of European Socialists.

And also, why are you defending Milosevic so much? He betrayed the Serbs of Krajina, then later the Serbian Republic where he brought sanctions on his own people, and finally abandoned Kosovo Serbs and left them to the mercy of American, European and Albanian savages. Mind you, before 1999 Milosevic had the opportunity to purchase Russian S-300 anti aircraft missiles as Iran had done to deter American aggression, which he refused. Instead, the power-hungry maniac had starved Serbia’s army to fund his own police. At the end of every war, after all that 'badass' bluffing of his, Slobo would go ahead and sign off all concessions, even more than would be asked of him.

That jerk deserved to die in the Hague behind bars like the thousands of other Serbs he jailed during his years of rule. Some of you are forgetting that he signed Serbia’s cooperation with the ICTY. Of course, while he accepted the idea of sending other people to the tribunal, he hadn’t had himself in mind. If Serbia was a self respecting country, it would have hanged Milosevic in the Belgrade streets, rather than sending him to that Kangaroo court.

You may wish to add comments
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4375437.ece?Submitted=true
The more the better - pass it on.

If Serbia was a self respecting country, it would have hanged Milosevic in the Belgrade streets, rather than sending him to that Kangaroo court.

Trying him in Serbia would have been the proper course.
But would the court have been any less 'kangaroo'?.
Wouldn't 'victors' justice still have prevailed?.