« Call for the Second Nuremberg | Main | Saakashvili, a War Criminal »

The War Began

south-ossetia.gif

Georgian "Storm"

South Ossetia: The War Began!, by Andrei Areshev, Strategic Culture Foundation

The night of August 7, Georgian forces launched an attack on Tskhinvali, which Tbilisi cynically described as an effort to restore the constitutional order. Just hours earlier, Saakashvili declared a ceasefire in the conflict zone, but the move was only a propaganda maneuver disguising the plan for a large-scale offensive. The timing is carefully chosen — the attention worldwide is focused on the opening of the Olympic Games, Russian Prime Minister V. Putin is in Beijing, and Russian President D. Medvedev is on a short vacation.

Georgian forces are acting with extreme ferocity. A total devastation of the Tskhinvali downtown which came under Grad missile, artillery, mortar, and machine gun fire has been reported. Dozens of blasts shatter the city every minute. Tens of armored vehicles and thousands of soldiers moved into the conflict zone. Russian Peacekeeping Force Deputy Commander V. Ivanov said that the positions of the peacekeepers were not directly targeted or hit and that they continue to watch the situation in the region. However, the Ossetian side and Russian journalists say that the peacekeepers' headquarters came under fire.

U.S. Administration, Unsurprisingly, Openly Sides with Saakashvili's Thugs

The offensive has already left tens if not hundreds of people dead. Nevertheless, it appears that the activity of the peacekeepers remains limited to monitoring the situation. Their inaction helps the aggressor — the Georgian side states that the Russian peacekeepers are not intervening in the conflict. The army of South Ossetia returned fire, but it has no potential comparable to that of the Georgian forces. Several Ossetian villages have already been seized and there is a possibility that the Zar highway linking the Republic to Russia will be blocked.

The statement made by Mathew Bryza in connection with the events is remarkably cynical — cunningly siding with Georgia and interpreting Moscow's position in the manner of a downright hooligan, he blamed the escalation on South Ossetia. Earlier C. Rice said in Tbilisi that the US was entirely on Georgia's side in the conflict, thus leaving no doubts concerning the US position. US State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos says the US demands that Moscow exert pressure on the leadership of South Ossetia in order to achieve a ceasefire in the conflict zone. At the same time, the Georgian side is no more than advised to exercise restraint.

Saakashvili Advised by the Western Powers to Apply Croat Scenario for Serbian Krajina: Georgian "Storm"

It is symbolic that Tbilisi launched the aggression on the anniversary of the fall of the Republic of Serbian Krajina. Its demise became a prologue to the next phase of the Balkan war - to the war in Kosovo, the NATO strikes on Serbia, and the humiliation and partition of the country. It has been said many times that the West is reusing the Balkan scenario in the Caucasus, and that this time Russia is planned to play the role of Serbia. Belgrade politicians who said 13 years ago that selling their countrymen in Croatia and Bosnia would preclude the Western aggression now pretend they were unaware that Serbia's turn would come after the Serbs in Croatia and Bosnia.

Is Moscow capable to learn at least anything from the recent past? In 1995, the UN "peacekeepers" opened the way for the Croatian army which was killing Serbs, and these days we see Russian and Ossetian peacekeepers helplessly watch the Georgian artillery hammer residential quarters in Tskhinvali. In the Caucasus, the consequences of such helplessness are going to be catastrophic — there will be no respect for the weak country unable to normalize the situation at its border and to protect its citizens.

The situation can spin out of control and evolve to the conditions under which the federal authorities will be unable to control not only the activities of informal leaders and the mobs of their followers, but even those of the heads of the Republics of the North Caucasus who — in case the escalation continues - will start acting independently and attempt to somehow establish control over the process. North Ossetian President Taymuraz Mamsurov already said that hundreds of volunteers are on their way to South Ossetia. He said: "We cannot stop them". People from other Republics of the North Caucus and from Abkhazia are ready to do the same. As of 4 a.m. August 8, the border guards in North Ossetia did not report Russian forces crossing the border.

Bush with his Caucas thug

The Georgian aggression deals a heavy blow to Russia's positions in the North Caucasus. In case it is "backed" by several terrorist acts (the blast at a beach in Sochi was a wakeup call), more than just the 2014 Olympiad will be at stake. The entire system of administration in Russia can be rendered shaky by several precisely targeted strikes, the result being a direct threat to the existence of the Russian state.

Sadly, the warnings about the long-term negative consequences of the passivity of the Russian diplomacy in dealing with the issue of the unrecognized Republics have had no effect despite being reiterated for years. The obvious truth that the Georgian authority so heavily armed by the West is not going to play games and some day will go all the way to the end was simply ignored. As in 1992 and 1993, it is Russia who will have to address the resulting problems, the difference being that today's Georgian army is something much more serious than the gangs led by Kitovani and Ioseliani.

Russia Must be Assertive

So far Moscow has reacted to Georgia's aggressive intentions solely by uncertain calls for peace and invitations to sign an agreement not to use force, thus practically making the job easier for Tbilisi. Hopes that «things will somehow settle down» and that Moscow's non-recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia will delay Georgia's NATO integration — which was a decided matter - have not materialized. Tbilisi openly ridiculed such expectations and remained fully aware of its tasks and of the support of its allies. Unfortunately, Russia did not provide equally decisive support to its friends in the Caucasus.

At the moment, only urgent measures can remedy the situation. Russia should immediately break diplomatic relations with Georgia, and, in case the aggression continues, deliver airstrikes on the Georgian forces in South Osssetia (including the Liakhv corridor which is Georgia's main strategic recourse in the de-facto Republic).

Only a prompt and resolute response can arrest the aggression and also prevent similar developments in Abkhazia, which would destabilize the Caucasus irreversibly. Statements like "we will not just stand by" and "we have an adequate response" are no longer enough. As the informational aspect of the resolute response, Russia should state that it opens an anti-terrorist operation aimed at countering the act of state terrorism and at protecting the lives of civilians.

Following the return to the status quo — this time ensured by force — Russia should immediately form a defense alliance with South Ossetia and Abkhazia and the Russian parliament should establish the status of the two Republics as associated subjects within the Russian Federation.

South Ossetia: The War Began! »

The Stench of a Familiar Setup

Taking page directly from the Croat, Bosnian Muslim and Kosovo Albanian filthy wars -- internationalizing the issue and crying for Western help while attacking others -- Georgian president "appealed directly to the international community, saying the confrontation was concerned America, values and freedom."

KLA, anyone?

"Saakashvili said his five million-strong nation, with its comparably small army, has no chance of defeating the might of Russia. That is why he has called on the outside world to step in and halt what he called Moscow’s blunt aggression."

So, even though Saakashvili's well aware he can't possibly take Russia on, he still attacks and kills Russian peacekeepers and civilians in South Ossetia. That could only be because he knows he can count on U.S.-led NATO to fight his dirty war. Just like Tudjman, Izetbegovic and Thaci before him.

Is United States now going to get into the war with Russia? Is NATO going to bomb Moscow now? If they claim Russia is an "aggressor" for trying to protect 75,000 hapless Russians in South Ossetia, then they should try to attack Russia like Serbia, see how that one goes... whether they get to fly over Western Europe before getting their teeth bashed in. Or, more likely, are they "just" going to have NATO march in Russian-populated South Ossetia under the guise of "peacekeepers", to enable Georgia's Thaci to exterminate all the Russians and get that strategic chunk of Caucasus under their boots, exactly like the Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohija? We shall see. Hopefully, Russians will be smarter and less gullible than the Serbs, now that they know fully well how these things get done, from former Yugoslavia and Serbia in particular.

Recommended: Georgia resumes bombardment of South Ossetia: "Georgian forces have resumed shelling in South Ossetia, ending a ceasefire declared by Tbilisi on Thursday. Fifteen people are reported to have been killed in overnight attacks. At Russia’s request, the UN Security Council is holding an emergency debate on the escalation of violence." (Russia Today); Georgia starts war against S.Ossetia

Comments

As I posted on the previous blog, it appears those involved in the ethnic cleansing of the Krajina are involved.
I am listening to Russia Today and frankly find it quite difficult to work out what is happening. The western media are just rolling over continual blatant Georgian lies.
It looks to me like the Russians are all talk and not much action.
Not speaking the language doesn't help.
We are told 30,000 refugees fled to Russia. Exactly what they want - Krajina, Bosnia and Kosovo over again.

This is my "hot" comments to Georgian aggression in Osetia:

http://www.jednodniowka.com/news.php?readmore=107

It is in Polish. If you know it, have a nice reading!

Please allow me another link. This is a British one and exposes exactly what could be the real scenario. That is georgia is merely keeping Russia busy.

http://europebusines.blogspot.com/2008/08/massive-us-naval-armada-heads-for-iran.html

Is Saakashvili a muslim??

I don't think that the USA will join in the fighting - in fact, it looks as if Georgia has been left with its arse hanging out the window, and a good thing to.

Russia's response has been wonderful to see, and my only wonder is why they did not reply in such a robust way to the Kosovo aggression? Still, better late than never, so let's just be pleased to see aggression turned back.

I am blogging on this crisis and will be updating probably all weekend.

There will be no "Georgian Storm" because Russians are not in the same military and economic position as Serbs were in relation to NATO. The US, Georgia and Gulag EU know that. If Georgia listens to their US and NATO pimps they will get the crap beaten out of them by the new assertive Russia.

Adam...Your link looks interesting. Wish I could read Polski.

Elizabeth....According to the CIA website

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gg.html

Georgia is approx 84 percent Eastern Orthodox Christian. Are these people allowing the backstabbing "BUSHBOTS" to incite a Christian against Christian conflict in Georgia?? Is the Georgian head of state "BUSHBOT" Saakashvili a muslim??

The Swedish FM has written a blog entry in English on this matter.

http://carlbildt.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/the-principles-at-stake/

This blog entry is open for comments. People with good arguments can post them on the Carl Bildt blog where they have a good chance of being read by the international elite, which Bildt himself takes active part in (Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission etc).

Elizabeth, don't worry if you don't understand Polish. Just go to

http://translate.google.com/

Paste the http-address into the field under "Translate a Web Page" and choose Polish->English. Very easy and it works really well. If you want to translate Serbian pages, choose Croatian->English. Croatian language is actually the same as Serbian, they just renamed it and changed some words to 19:th century variations of the words. The same goes for Montenegrin and Bosnian web pages.

And the only sane published comment at Bildt's entry is your own, Lars!

The level of hypocrisy, shortness of memory and utter blindness is completely unbelievable and very scary: people can, actually, be persuaded to go along with anything! What Bildt says is basically that Serbia was an "aggressor" who disrespected international laws and rules by defending its own citizens in its own province of Kosovo and Metohija, and it had to be stopped -- bombed -- and further punished by getting its ancient territory severed, declared a separate state and recognized by the self-styled champions of democracy, the West.

South Ossetia, on the other hand, a Russian province generously gifted to Georgia by Stalin during his dictatorship, may, should and indeed must be attacked by Georgia's army and police, because, unlike Serbs in their province of Kosovo, Georgians are merely "restoring peace and order" in South Ossetia. Where Serbs were "aggressors", Georgians are allowed to be a "legitimate power" and the only ones allowed to get in and do whatever they want to do to those Russians. Russia must not interfere! The EU may, NATO may, U.S. may and should interfere, but Russia must get out of the way.

And people buy this crock?! Unbelievable.

P.S. couple of us left comments, but we're not holding our breaths re having them published

Joesixpack31, can't find if Saakashvili's muslim or what, but there's no doubt he's a BUSHBOT alright.

In response to Britmex as to why Serbia did not react similarly to NATO Kocobo aggression,there are two main reasons, in my opinion:
1. Serbia does not have nuclear weapons;
2. Serbia was outnumbered by over 100:1 by the NATO and Islamic nations'criminal pack, in numbers, weapons and financial resources, etc.
3. Russia was not able to assist Serbia effectively since they had an alcoholic president at the helm who was also selling out his own country to the western imperial interests.

The global situation has changed since then economically, politically and militarily.

We'll see how "tough" the Gulag EU, NATO and US bullies are when faced with someone of comparable size and strength.

There are three very interesting comments in the Bildt blog by someone calling himself kumbayaga. It is always a pleasure to read the words of a true intellectual that is not brainwashed by western propaganda.